Technology News from Around the World, Instantly on Oracnoos!

Honda Nissan Billion: Latest Updates and Analysis

Honda and Nissan’s $60 billion EV partnership plans are already falling apart

Honda and Nissan’s $60 billion EV partnership plans are already falling apart

The landmark EV merger, which would create the world’s third-largest automaker, may not happen after all. Honda and Nissan’s EV partnership plans are reportedly already being called off. The partnership was expected to help the Japanese automakers survive after falling behind BYD, Tesla, and others as the industry shifts to electric.

Why are Honda and Nissan’s EV merger plans on hold?

After Honda and Nissan signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) in December, confirming plans to create a new joint EV holding enterprise, the merger is already being called off.

During a board meeting on Wednesday, Nissan introduced it was considering scrapping the EV merger. , the announcement came after Nissan informed Honda that it planned to put talks on hold late Tuesday.

As Reuters reported, Nissan and Honda stated the Nikkei study was not based on official business announcements. A final decision on the merger is planned for mid-February.

With around 8 million in combined sales, the partnership would have established the third-largest auto group, behind Toyota and Volkswagen, with a value of around $58 billion.

Nissan already presented it was cutting around 9,000 jobs and 20% of global output to cut costs and improve profits. Will it be enough without Honda’s help?

Nissan and Honda are quickly falling behind in the global auto market, with new threats like Tesla, BYD, and other Chinese automakers gaining momentum.

For the first time, BYD sold more vehicles globally than Nissan and Honda last year. With new EVs arriving in Europe, Southeast Asia, South and Central America, and several other overseas markets, BYD expects 2025 to be even bigger. In its first full sales year, BYD even sold more electric vehicles than Toyota in Japan, its home market.

Japanese automakers have already lost significant market share in China, one of their most crucial markets, but now sales are falling in other key regions.

The merger was expected to help the Japanese auto giants catch up as the industry shifts to EVs, “which is expressed to occur once every 100 years,” ’s CEO Toshihiro Mibe.

During a press conference in December, Mibe explained that “the rise of Chinese automakers and new players has changed the car industry quite a lot,” adding, “We have to build up capabilities to fight with them by 2030, otherwise we’ll be beaten.”.

Can Honda and Nissan survive the transition without each other? Let us know what you think in the comments below.

Tesla (TSLA) released its financial results and shareholders letter for the fourth quarter (Q4) and full-year 2024 after market close today.

Despite mocking 350 kW as “a child’s toy” in 2016, the firm is just rolling out 325 kW V4 chargers in 2025. Meanwhile companies like BP are celebra......

Ford (NYSE: F) released its fourth-quarter earnings research after the market closed on Wednesday, beating top and bottom line forecasts. Although its M......

Ionna scales up toward targeted 30,000 EV chargers by 2030

Ionna scales up toward targeted 30,000 EV chargers by 2030

The [website] EV charging network Ionna is picking up speed in its infrastructure build-out as the nascent network aims to make good on its promise of installing tens of thousands of electric vehicle chargers over the next five years.

It stated on Tuesday in a press release that it is transitioning "from public beta to full-scale national release" following the opening of its first location and the conclusion of a testing program in 2024.

The testing program involved more than 4,400 charging sessions with more than 80 unique EV models, dispensing nearly 63,000 kwh of energy, . It added that the goal was to "stress-test" the network; now the focus shifts to the network build-out.

Ionna was initially backed by seven automakers, including BMW Group, General Motors, Honda, Hyundai, Kia, Mercedes-Benz, and Stellantis. Toyota joined Ionna in 2024. The network was unveiled in 2023 as the first potential rival to the Tesla Supercharger network in North America, and has steadily built momentum as plans for continued expansion of the Supercharger network have fluctuated.

Ionna now claims to have more than 100 contracted charging sites nationwide, and just this week announced new sites in Houston, Texas; Abilene, Kansas; and Wilcox, Arizona. Those join six already under construction. They'll be accompanied by new tech features, including expanded Plug & Charge compatibility and Amazon "Just Walk Out" tech that lets drivers grab refreshments without having to wait in line.

Its first location is in Apex, [website], in what Ionna refers to as a "Rechargery"—in a converted gas station.

Ionna hopes to have 1,000 new charging bays online by the end of the year, on the way to a goal of 30,000 bays by 2030 that was first unveiled in 2023. "Bays" is the metric Ionna uses in place of charging connectors. It essentially means charging spots, although each spot can have multiple connectors. Those connectors can be CCS or NACS, it has noted.

Tesla's opened its Supercharger network to non-Teslas.

Ford and Rivian were the first non-Teslas to plug in.

Access takes an automaker-provided adapte......

We are finally getting a look at Volkswagen’s answer to BYD and other low-cost Chinese electric cars. Volkswagen previewed its cheapest EV for the fir......

Mercedes-Benz had a rough EV sales year in 2024 in the US, so it’s hitting the reset button this year......

This is the Chinese EV Ford’s CEO says it needs to beat ‘straight up in a street fight’

This is the Chinese EV Ford’s CEO says it needs to beat ‘straight up in a street fight’

After announcing its electric vehicle business lost over $5 billion in 2024, Ford could face even more headwinds this year. Despite the threat of new tariffs and fewer government incentives, CEO Jim Farley stressed Ford is still “really confident” in its EV strategy. Farley revealed that Chinese EV makers are becoming a major global force, and even with tariffs, Ford needs to beat them “straight up in a street fight.” This is the electric car he was referring to.

Ford reported fourth-quarter earnings on Wednesday, beating Wall Street’s top- and bottom-line estimates. Despite posting $[website] billion in Q4 revenue, Ford’s model e division reported an EBIT loss of $[website] billion.

The EV business lost $[website] billion last year after losing $[website] billion in 2023. On the organization’s earnings call, Farley stated new competition led to increased pricing pressure. Ford expects Model e to lose another $5 billion to $[website] billion this year. In total, the organization is forecasting an adjusted EBIT of $7 billion to $[website] billion in 2025.

Like GM, Ford did not factor in the potential impacts of tariffs or other changes in policy by the Trump administration.

Farley explained on the call that “There’s no question that tariffs at 25% level from Canada and Mexico, if they’re protracted, would have a huge impact on our industry, with billions of dollars of industry profits wiped out and an adverse effect on the US jobs.”.

Ford’s CEO mentioned he looks forward to working with government leaders to ensure they are “strengthening, not weakening our nation’s auto industry.”.

The tariff situation, growing demand for the latest tech and software, and “the Chinese OEMs growing to become a global reality,” Farley mentioned, “these dynamics will all play out for some time to come.”.

Ford CEO warns Chinese EV makers are a global threat.

Ford sells some electric cars outside of the US, including the new electric Puma, Explorer, and Capri models, launched in Europe, so it does have an idea of the changing market dynamics.

After accounting for 8% of car sales in the US last year, Farley presented EVs are growing, and “people who buy these vehicles don’t go back to combustion.” He added that it is a “very vibrant market” and a “global capability for Ford.”.

As a global player, it will need to compete with Chinese EVs, which Farley has previously called an “existential threat” to the industry. During the earnings call, Farley touched on the subject, saying they continue to expand and are becoming “a major force in our industry.”.

After Morgan Stanley analyst Adam Jonas asked, “Do you think that [website] tariff policies will be successful in keeping Chinese EVs out of the US market long term,” Farley mentioned the topic “is really pertinent to us.”.

Ford’s CEO added, “The level of subsidies that these companies have in China is very material as well as these are digital vehicles with digital footprints and really deep into people’s digital life.” Farley explained, “On the kind of unfair part or the subsidy part, I think we’ll have to sort that out as a country.”.

At the end of the day, “the business has to stand on its own.” Ford will work with government partners to make it a level playing field, but “in the end of the day, it’s management’s responsibility to beat the SU7 straight up in a street fight.”.

The SU7 is Xiaomi’s first self-developed electric car. After shipping one to the US and driving it for a few months, Farley called it “fantastic” and didn’t want to give it up.

After launching the SU7 last April, Xiaomi revealed it had already delivered over 135,000 models in 2024. The SU7 starts at around $30,000 (215,900 yuan).

Ford is betting on its low-cost platform, which is being developed by a team of former Tesla, Rivian, Lucid, and Apple engineers, to help it compete.

The first models, due out in 2027, are expected to be a smaller electric pickup and SUV, starting at about $30,000.

Ford CEO Jim Farley did not mince words while explaining some of the drawbacks of very large, fully electric SUVs and trucks.

In the near term, electric vehicle startup Polestar's goal is to go more upmarket: more premium, more performance, more luxury. The Polestar 3 leads t......

President Donald Trump's Department of Transportation just dealt a blow to a key federal program that funds the rollout of electric vehicle charging i......

Market Impact Analysis

Market Growth Trend

2018201920202021202220232024
8.3%10.0%10.5%11.6%12.3%12.7%12.8%
8.3%10.0%10.5%11.6%12.3%12.7%12.8% 2018201920202021202220232024

Quarterly Growth Rate

Q1 2024 Q2 2024 Q3 2024 Q4 2024
10.9% 11.7% 12.4% 12.8%
10.9% Q1 11.7% Q2 12.4% Q3 12.8% Q4

Market Segments and Growth Drivers

Segment Market Share Growth Rate
Connected Cars35%14.2%
Autonomous Driving22%18.5%
EV Technology28%21.9%
Telematics10%9.7%
Other Automotive Tech5%6.3%
Connected Cars35.0%Autonomous Driving22.0%EV Technology28.0%Telematics10.0%Other Automotive Tech5.0%

Technology Maturity Curve

Different technologies within the ecosystem are at varying stages of maturity:

Innovation Trigger Peak of Inflated Expectations Trough of Disillusionment Slope of Enlightenment Plateau of Productivity AI/ML Blockchain VR/AR Cloud Mobile

Competitive Landscape Analysis

Company Market Share
Tesla16.9%
Waymo12.3%
NVIDIA DRIVE10.7%
Bosch9.5%
Continental7.8%

Future Outlook and Predictions

The Honda Nissan Billion landscape is evolving rapidly, driven by technological advancements, changing threat vectors, and shifting business requirements. Based on current trends and expert analyses, we can anticipate several significant developments across different time horizons:

Year-by-Year Technology Evolution

Based on current trajectory and expert analyses, we can project the following development timeline:

2024Early adopters begin implementing specialized solutions with measurable results
2025Industry standards emerging to facilitate broader adoption and integration
2026Mainstream adoption begins as technical barriers are addressed
2027Integration with adjacent technologies creates new capabilities
2028Business models transform as capabilities mature
2029Technology becomes embedded in core infrastructure and processes
2030New paradigms emerge as the technology reaches full maturity

Technology Maturity Curve

Different technologies within the ecosystem are at varying stages of maturity, influencing adoption timelines and investment priorities:

Time / Development Stage Adoption / Maturity Innovation Early Adoption Growth Maturity Decline/Legacy Emerging Tech Current Focus Established Tech Mature Solutions (Interactive diagram available in full report)

Innovation Trigger

  • Generative AI for specialized domains
  • Blockchain for supply chain verification

Peak of Inflated Expectations

  • Digital twins for business processes
  • Quantum-resistant cryptography

Trough of Disillusionment

  • Consumer AR/VR applications
  • General-purpose blockchain

Slope of Enlightenment

  • AI-driven analytics
  • Edge computing

Plateau of Productivity

  • Cloud infrastructure
  • Mobile applications

Technology Evolution Timeline

1-2 Years
  • Technology adoption accelerating across industries
  • digital transformation initiatives becoming mainstream
3-5 Years
  • Significant transformation of business processes through advanced technologies
  • new digital business models emerging
5+ Years
  • Fundamental shifts in how technology integrates with business and society
  • emergence of new technology paradigms

Expert Perspectives

Leading experts in the automotive tech sector provide diverse perspectives on how the landscape will evolve over the coming years:

"Technology transformation will continue to accelerate, creating both challenges and opportunities."

— Industry Expert

"Organizations must balance innovation with practical implementation to achieve meaningful results."

— Technology Analyst

"The most successful adopters will focus on business outcomes rather than technology for its own sake."

— Research Director

Areas of Expert Consensus

  • Acceleration of Innovation: The pace of technological evolution will continue to increase
  • Practical Integration: Focus will shift from proof-of-concept to operational deployment
  • Human-Technology Partnership: Most effective implementations will optimize human-machine collaboration
  • Regulatory Influence: Regulatory frameworks will increasingly shape technology development

Short-Term Outlook (1-2 Years)

In the immediate future, organizations will focus on implementing and optimizing currently available technologies to address pressing automotive tech challenges:

  • Technology adoption accelerating across industries
  • digital transformation initiatives becoming mainstream

These developments will be characterized by incremental improvements to existing frameworks rather than revolutionary changes, with emphasis on practical deployment and measurable outcomes.

Mid-Term Outlook (3-5 Years)

As technologies mature and organizations adapt, more substantial transformations will emerge in how security is approached and implemented:

  • Significant transformation of business processes through advanced technologies
  • new digital business models emerging

This period will see significant changes in security architecture and operational models, with increasing automation and integration between previously siloed security functions. Organizations will shift from reactive to proactive security postures.

Long-Term Outlook (5+ Years)

Looking further ahead, more fundamental shifts will reshape how cybersecurity is conceptualized and implemented across digital ecosystems:

  • Fundamental shifts in how technology integrates with business and society
  • emergence of new technology paradigms

These long-term developments will likely require significant technical breakthroughs, new regulatory frameworks, and evolution in how organizations approach security as a fundamental business function rather than a technical discipline.

Key Risk Factors and Uncertainties

Several critical factors could significantly impact the trajectory of automotive tech evolution:

Regulatory approval delays
Battery technology limitations
Consumer trust issues

Organizations should monitor these factors closely and develop contingency strategies to mitigate potential negative impacts on technology implementation timelines.

Alternative Future Scenarios

The evolution of technology can follow different paths depending on various factors including regulatory developments, investment trends, technological breakthroughs, and market adoption. We analyze three potential scenarios:

Optimistic Scenario

Rapid adoption of advanced technologies with significant business impact

Key Drivers: Supportive regulatory environment, significant research breakthroughs, strong market incentives, and rapid user adoption.

Probability: 25-30%

Base Case Scenario

Measured implementation with incremental improvements

Key Drivers: Balanced regulatory approach, steady technological progress, and selective implementation based on clear ROI.

Probability: 50-60%

Conservative Scenario

Technical and organizational barriers limiting effective adoption

Key Drivers: Restrictive regulations, technical limitations, implementation challenges, and risk-averse organizational cultures.

Probability: 15-20%

Scenario Comparison Matrix

FactorOptimisticBase CaseConservative
Implementation TimelineAcceleratedSteadyDelayed
Market AdoptionWidespreadSelectiveLimited
Technology EvolutionRapidProgressiveIncremental
Regulatory EnvironmentSupportiveBalancedRestrictive
Business ImpactTransformativeSignificantModest

Transformational Impact

Technology becoming increasingly embedded in all aspects of business operations. This evolution will necessitate significant changes in organizational structures, talent development, and strategic planning processes.

The convergence of multiple technological trends—including artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and ubiquitous connectivity—will create both unprecedented security challenges and innovative defensive capabilities.

Implementation Challenges

Technical complexity and organizational readiness remain key challenges. Organizations will need to develop comprehensive change management strategies to successfully navigate these transitions.

Regulatory uncertainty, particularly around emerging technologies like AI in security applications, will require flexible security architectures that can adapt to evolving compliance requirements.

Key Innovations to Watch

Artificial intelligence, distributed systems, and automation technologies leading innovation. Organizations should monitor these developments closely to maintain competitive advantages and effective security postures.

Strategic investments in research partnerships, technology pilots, and talent development will position forward-thinking organizations to leverage these innovations early in their development cycle.

Technical Glossary

Key technical terms and definitions to help understand the technologies discussed in this article.

Understanding the following technical concepts is essential for grasping the full implications of the security threats and defensive measures discussed in this article. These definitions provide context for both technical and non-technical readers.

Filter by difficulty:

platform intermediate

algorithm Platforms provide standardized environments that reduce development complexity and enable ecosystem growth through shared functionality and integration capabilities.

electric vehicle intermediate

interface