Jeep, Ford, Audi PHEV recalls: Battery replacement the next step? - Related to step?, phev, ford,, new, dot
Jeep, Ford, Audi PHEV recalls: Battery replacement the next step?

Damage to the batteries' separator could lead to shorts and/or fires.
Recall campaigns from Stellantis, Ford, and Audi allow replacement of battery packs.
New paperwork filed by battery supplier Samsung SDI says the issue remains under investigation.
Plug-in hybrids from multiple automakers have been recalled due a potential issue with vehicles' Samsung SDI-supplied battery cells that could cause loss of power or fires. And new paperwork filed with the federal government this week hints at that the issue has not yet been fully resolved.
A total of 180,196 vehicles are affected in the [website], including 155,096 from Stellantis, 20,484 from Ford, and 4,616 from Audi. Each automaker, in recent months, already introduced an individual recall for its respective vehicles.
Stellantis issued a battery-related recall for the Jeep Wrangler 4xe and Jeep Grand Cherokee 4xe SUVs last October. Audi then recalled its Q5 and A7 plug-in hybrids in December, and Ford then issued a recall for plug-in hybrid versions of the Ford Escape and Lincoln Corsair SUVs in January.
All of these vehicles have Samsung SDI cells that are broadly similar, , which emphasizing that exact specifications are still unique to each automaker. Each automaker told the safety agency that defects in these cells could lead to internal short circuits or fires. Ford and Stellantis also reported damage in the separator layer between the cathode and anode in some cells, which could lead to short circuits and fires. Ford and Audi both mentioned internal analysis pointed to manufacturing defects, and both mentioned they would install new software as a temporary remedy.
These new documents filed by Samsung SDI don't expand the list of vehicles recalled, but they underscore that the issue lacks a clear resolution, as of yet. In paperwork filed February 5, Samsung SDI calls the issue "still under investigation" for both Ford and Audi. A letter from the NHTSA, reacting to the Samsing SDI filing and dated February 6, asks the battery supplier for a "summary of all warranty states, field or service reports, and other information."
In a statement provided to Green Car Reports Friday, Jeep parent Stellantis underscored that for its vehicles, the issue has been remedied. "The remedy includes a software modification and, if necessary, replacement of the high-voltage battery, both provided at no cost to owners," it stated, pointing to notification letters sent out in December. "Customer safety is our highest priority, and we appreciate the patience of our clients as we worked to resolve this matter and implement a solution for all affected vehicles."
For now, owners of affected vehicles can call the respective automakers' customer service departments for more information. Stellantis can be reached at 800-853-1403, Audi at 800-253-2834, and Ford at 866-436-7332.
Perodua has climbed a spot from third place in ASEAN by sales in 2023 wh...
"Based on the memorandum of understanding signed on December 23 last year, Nissan and [Honda] are in the stage of advancing various discussions, inclu...
BMW is rumored to launch its first electric M3 in 2027. We already know it won't outright replace the gas model, with the organization confirming the next-...
Nissan e-Power technology a hit with Aussie car buyers

Australians are warming to Nissan’s unique take on hybrid powertrain technology, and the Japanese auto brand is looking to further expand its e-Power range as sales increase.
The e-Power hybrid system employs the engine under the bonnet solely as a generator for the car’s electric motor/s, providing an EV driving experience without the petrol engine directly powering the wheels.
For context, Toyota hybrid systems allow the electric motor/s and petrol engine to drive the wheels at the same time, or individually. So, you can run on EV power, or petrol power, or a combination of the two.
While the majority of Toyota Australia models are now hybrid-only, e-Power variants accounted for 26 per cent of Nissan X-Trail mid-sized SUV sales Down Under in 2024, while e-Power versions accounted for 15 per cent of Qashqai small SUV sales last year, despite only being available from March.
Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now.
Nissan Australia is ‘ecstatic’ with those figures, and managing director Andrew Humberstone anticipates ongoing growth of its unique hybrid brand.
“There are many variants and opportunities open to us… e-Power technology is really critical for that migration from ICE [internal combustion engines], to hybrid reinvented, to full electric,” Mr Humberstone told CarExpert.
Nissan Australia has admitted that it initially struggled to communicate the benefits of e-Power with potential buyers, even as the market for hybrid SUVs surged, led mostly by Australia’s top-selling SUV, the Toyota RAV4 Hybrid.
Mr Humberstone is confident that local clients finally understand the technology, paving the way for a further expansion of the lineup and increased sales.
“We were not successful in how we communicated it originally, and people didn’t understand that it was a hybrid technology.
“What we know is that when people drive the car, they buy, and that’s once they understand the technology.
“This has been a learning curve in terms of coaching the network, the dealers, the salesmen, but also communicating with clients and changing the global brand strategy from just ‘e-Power’ to ‘e-Power, hybrid reinvented’.
“I think it’d be interesting to have this conversation in 12 months’ time, because we’ve really worked on our brand manifesto, really worked on brand positioning by model.”.
Nissan’s innovative e-Power technology was first made available in Australia in the flagship X-Trail Ti-L variant, before being expanded to other five-seat, all-wheel drive versions of its popular mid-sized SUV, including the ST-L and Ti, before the flagship Qashqai Ti e-Power arrived.
Nissan currently only offers e-Power versions of the X-Trail and Qashqai in Australia, however, the technology powers a vast array of models overseas.
Hybrid vehicle sales are up [website] per cent so far this year in Australia, while EV sales are down [website] per cent. Last year, hybrid sales rose by 76 per cent compared to 2023.
Electric vehicle lease and finance deals have come a long way. With an influx of affordable models and rising inventories, there are plenty of great o...
When it comes to oddities of the electric vehicle variety, it doesn’t take much to pique my interest. If it’s got an electric motor and a funky shape,...
Ford debuted its all-electric F-150 Lightning to considerable fanfare a few years ago, and it's sold reasonably well since then. The automaker billed ...
Trump DOT freezes EV charger funding, demands new state plans

DOT to review $[website] federal EV charging program, funded with 2021 Bipartisan Infrastructure Law.
Keeps funding projects in progress but rescinds guidance for continued buildout.
Means new state proposals for rules not yet released, months of delay for states' funding.
Tesla has captured more than $41 million in government money for the buildout.
The Trump Administration is stalling on dispersing more funds to [website] states for the Biden Administration's electric vehicle charging infrastructure program—one that Tesla has profited from handily.
The National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) Formula Program calls for 500,000 charging stations nationwide, and was funded with $[website] billion under the 2021 infrastructure law to make that happen. That total was split into $5 billion for a highway-based program, and $[website] billion for rural and underserved communities, with states submitting proposals for use of the available funds.
But on Thursday the Department of Transportation (DOT) expressed it had "decided to review the policies underlying the implementation" of the NEVI program, and was rescinding all previous guidance. That's being used as an excuse to stop the funding of new projects.
Redirect of FHWA webpage that previously contained NEVI documents from Feb. 6, 2025.
The DOT stated that "effective immediately, no new obligations may occur under the NEVI Formula Program until the updated final NEVI Formula Program Guidance is issued and new state plans are submitted and approved." Payments will still be made for projects already in progress, though.
"Until new guidance is issued, reimbursement of existing obligations will be allowed in order to not disrupt current financial commitments," the DOT noted.
Lawsuits will likely follow to free up the rest of the money, which the DOT is legally obligated to release to projects that meet requirements set out in the infrastructure law. While the DOT can issue guidance to clarify specifics, it can't contradict the law itself or withhold funds in perpetuity.
As of late Thursday evening, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) had also removed NEVI documents from its website. This follows a reported pattern of information being removed from federal websites since Trump's return to office.
As Elon Musk continues to exert influence on the federal government as a private citizen, it's worth noting that Tesla ended up winning many NEVI contracts, so this will have a serious financial affect on the EV organization—and a growing conflict of interest. As of January 18, Tesla had captured more than $41 million in federal funding covering 99 different NEVI sites, .
The Ionna charging network—funded by eight full-line automakers and the most likely rival to Tesla's Supercharger network in North America—has also suggested it will look to take advantage of the NEVI program.
Although it picked up speed last spring, NEVI-funded project rollout has been slow because states submitting plans must also deal with individual regulators, utilities, and other bureaucracies. Now that they have to submit new plans, all over again, it's a major setback for the buildout—many months, if not years—even if the money isn't actually taken away.
The first electric Jeep in the US is already getting some hefty discounts. Jeep introduced significant savings for President’s Day, including on the n...
Electric vehicle lease and finance deals have come a long way. With an influx of affordable models and rising inventories, there are plenty of great o...
The Nissan-Honda merger saga continues with a new episode that takes an interesting twist. Although an official announcement has yet to be made, multi...
Market Impact Analysis
Market Growth Trend
2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
8.3% | 10.0% | 10.5% | 11.6% | 12.3% | 12.7% | 12.8% |
Quarterly Growth Rate
Q1 2024 | Q2 2024 | Q3 2024 | Q4 2024 |
---|---|---|---|
10.9% | 11.7% | 12.4% | 12.8% |
Market Segments and Growth Drivers
Segment | Market Share | Growth Rate |
---|---|---|
Connected Cars | 35% | 14.2% |
Autonomous Driving | 22% | 18.5% |
EV Technology | 28% | 21.9% |
Telematics | 10% | 9.7% |
Other Automotive Tech | 5% | 6.3% |
Technology Maturity Curve
Different technologies within the ecosystem are at varying stages of maturity:
Competitive Landscape Analysis
Company | Market Share |
---|---|
Tesla | 16.9% |
Waymo | 12.3% |
NVIDIA DRIVE | 10.7% |
Bosch | 9.5% |
Continental | 7.8% |
Future Outlook and Predictions
The Jeep Ford Audi landscape is evolving rapidly, driven by technological advancements, changing threat vectors, and shifting business requirements. Based on current trends and expert analyses, we can anticipate several significant developments across different time horizons:
Year-by-Year Technology Evolution
Based on current trajectory and expert analyses, we can project the following development timeline:
Technology Maturity Curve
Different technologies within the ecosystem are at varying stages of maturity, influencing adoption timelines and investment priorities:
Innovation Trigger
- Generative AI for specialized domains
- Blockchain for supply chain verification
Peak of Inflated Expectations
- Digital twins for business processes
- Quantum-resistant cryptography
Trough of Disillusionment
- Consumer AR/VR applications
- General-purpose blockchain
Slope of Enlightenment
- AI-driven analytics
- Edge computing
Plateau of Productivity
- Cloud infrastructure
- Mobile applications
Technology Evolution Timeline
- Technology adoption accelerating across industries
- digital transformation initiatives becoming mainstream
- Significant transformation of business processes through advanced technologies
- new digital business models emerging
- Fundamental shifts in how technology integrates with business and society
- emergence of new technology paradigms
Expert Perspectives
Leading experts in the automotive tech sector provide diverse perspectives on how the landscape will evolve over the coming years:
"Technology transformation will continue to accelerate, creating both challenges and opportunities."
— Industry Expert
"Organizations must balance innovation with practical implementation to achieve meaningful results."
— Technology Analyst
"The most successful adopters will focus on business outcomes rather than technology for its own sake."
— Research Director
Areas of Expert Consensus
- Acceleration of Innovation: The pace of technological evolution will continue to increase
- Practical Integration: Focus will shift from proof-of-concept to operational deployment
- Human-Technology Partnership: Most effective implementations will optimize human-machine collaboration
- Regulatory Influence: Regulatory frameworks will increasingly shape technology development
Short-Term Outlook (1-2 Years)
In the immediate future, organizations will focus on implementing and optimizing currently available technologies to address pressing automotive tech challenges:
- Technology adoption accelerating across industries
- digital transformation initiatives becoming mainstream
These developments will be characterized by incremental improvements to existing frameworks rather than revolutionary changes, with emphasis on practical deployment and measurable outcomes.
Mid-Term Outlook (3-5 Years)
As technologies mature and organizations adapt, more substantial transformations will emerge in how security is approached and implemented:
- Significant transformation of business processes through advanced technologies
- new digital business models emerging
This period will see significant changes in security architecture and operational models, with increasing automation and integration between previously siloed security functions. Organizations will shift from reactive to proactive security postures.
Long-Term Outlook (5+ Years)
Looking further ahead, more fundamental shifts will reshape how cybersecurity is conceptualized and implemented across digital ecosystems:
- Fundamental shifts in how technology integrates with business and society
- emergence of new technology paradigms
These long-term developments will likely require significant technical breakthroughs, new regulatory frameworks, and evolution in how organizations approach security as a fundamental business function rather than a technical discipline.
Key Risk Factors and Uncertainties
Several critical factors could significantly impact the trajectory of automotive tech evolution:
Organizations should monitor these factors closely and develop contingency strategies to mitigate potential negative impacts on technology implementation timelines.
Alternative Future Scenarios
The evolution of technology can follow different paths depending on various factors including regulatory developments, investment trends, technological breakthroughs, and market adoption. We analyze three potential scenarios:
Optimistic Scenario
Rapid adoption of advanced technologies with significant business impact
Key Drivers: Supportive regulatory environment, significant research breakthroughs, strong market incentives, and rapid user adoption.
Probability: 25-30%
Base Case Scenario
Measured implementation with incremental improvements
Key Drivers: Balanced regulatory approach, steady technological progress, and selective implementation based on clear ROI.
Probability: 50-60%
Conservative Scenario
Technical and organizational barriers limiting effective adoption
Key Drivers: Restrictive regulations, technical limitations, implementation challenges, and risk-averse organizational cultures.
Probability: 15-20%
Scenario Comparison Matrix
Factor | Optimistic | Base Case | Conservative |
---|---|---|---|
Implementation Timeline | Accelerated | Steady | Delayed |
Market Adoption | Widespread | Selective | Limited |
Technology Evolution | Rapid | Progressive | Incremental |
Regulatory Environment | Supportive | Balanced | Restrictive |
Business Impact | Transformative | Significant | Modest |
Transformational Impact
Technology becoming increasingly embedded in all aspects of business operations. This evolution will necessitate significant changes in organizational structures, talent development, and strategic planning processes.
The convergence of multiple technological trends—including artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and ubiquitous connectivity—will create both unprecedented security challenges and innovative defensive capabilities.
Implementation Challenges
Technical complexity and organizational readiness remain key challenges. Organizations will need to develop comprehensive change management strategies to successfully navigate these transitions.
Regulatory uncertainty, particularly around emerging technologies like AI in security applications, will require flexible security architectures that can adapt to evolving compliance requirements.
Key Innovations to Watch
Artificial intelligence, distributed systems, and automation technologies leading innovation. Organizations should monitor these developments closely to maintain competitive advantages and effective security postures.
Strategic investments in research partnerships, technology pilots, and talent development will position forward-thinking organizations to leverage these innovations early in their development cycle.
Technical Glossary
Key technical terms and definitions to help understand the technologies discussed in this article.
Understanding the following technical concepts is essential for grasping the full implications of the security threats and defensive measures discussed in this article. These definitions provide context for both technical and non-technical readers.