Technology News from Around the World, Instantly on Oracnoos!

Donald Trump’s proposed Canada, Mexico tariffs could be ‘devastating’ – Ford CEO - Related to war, into, trump’s, regulations, mexico

Car brands face $2.8 billion bill under new emissions regulations – peak body

Car brands face $2.8 billion bill under new emissions regulations – peak body

One of the peak bodies in Australia’s automotive industry has claimed car brands could pay a total of $[website] billion in penalties by 2029 if they can’t meet upcoming emissions regulations.

A study by Blueflag – (MTAA) in its pre-Budget submission to the Federal Government – asserts all brands combined will be hit with penalties totalling $[website] billion, based on the targets of the New Vehicle Efficiency Standard (NVES).

However, that figure is based on carmakers not making “further adaptation of product offerings”, applying only to the current model lineups and revealed plans of carmakers, not future vehicles which are yet to be publicly confirmed.

“These projections can, and should, continue to improve as car companies modernise their lineups,” the MTAA stated in a media release for the Federal Budget submission.

Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now.

The MTAA pointed to Toyota announcing its passenger vehicle lineup going hybrid-only – albeit only for models with petrol engines available – and the upcoming plug-in hybrid version of Ford’s best-selling Ranger ute as examples of adaptation in the market.

While the NVES came into effect on January 1, 2025, carmakers won’t be penalised for exceeding CO2 targets until July 1, 2025.

All new passenger and light commercial vehicles sold with a mass of less than [website] tonnes are covered under the scheme.

If carmakers exceed an average carbon emissions target on the vehicles they sell each year, they will be penalised $100 per g/km of CO2 for every vehicle which exceeds the target.

For 2025, the mandate for passenger cars (Type 1) is 141g/km of CO2, with light commercial vehicles and heavy-duty SUVs (Type 2) set at 210g/km or less.

These CO2 caps will reduce every year until 2029, when they will be much lower at 58 and 110g/km respectively, forcing manufacturers to sell increasingly efficient vehicles.

Brands can also earn emissions ‘credits’ by beating their fleet-wide targets, which can then be used in a subsequent year to help meet tighter CO2 targets, or sold on to other brands to help them reach their emissions targets.

Year Type 1 limit (g/km) Type 2 limit (g/km) 2025 141 210 2026 117 180 2027 92 150 2028 68 122 2029 58 110.

Unusually, the study finds GWM is “unlikely” to meet the Type 2 target for 2025 despite having a hybrid ute and off-roaders and, soon, a plug-in hybrid ute.

It says, however, that it’s “possible” Toyota will meet it despite having no hybrid, plug-in hybrid or electric off-roaders or light commercial vehicles, while Isuzu Ute and Mitsubishi are highly likely to despite also lacking such vehicles.

, Hyundai is Australia’s only “leading brand” which it deems highly likely to meet the 2029 Type 2 commercial vehicle target. No brands are set to meet the Type 1 passenger vehicle target, the peak body points to.

Kia could meet the Type 2 target if it makes “reasonable changes”, with Toyota and MG falling under the same category for Type 1 vehicles.

However, based on the current forecast, the MTAA believes Ford, Hyundai, GWM, Kia, Nissan, Mazda and Mitsubishi are among the best-selling brands that’ll miss the Type 1 vehicle target.

Likewise, it’s given the same prediction for Type 2 vehicles from Ford, GWM, Isuzu Ute, Mazda, Mitsubishi, Nissan and Toyota.

In its pre-Budget submission, the MTAA called for greater protections for car dealers, based on the claimed increased costs of carmakers meeting the NVES requirements.

“How manufacturers will manage these additional costs remains uncertain. However, given the highly competitive nature of the market, passing the full cost onto consumers may not be a viable option for all manufacturers,” the MTAA expressed.

“Instead, strategies may include absorbing costs, trading credits with EV-only brands, adjusting product lineups, or re-evaluating dealership structures to maintain profitability.

“Regardless of how these fines are managed, reduced profit margins for manufacturers will inevitably trickle down to dealerships, making an already challenging business environment even more difficult.

“Dealerships, which operate on tight margins and depend on strong sales volumes, may face increased financial strain, potential consolidation, or even closures if profit pressures continue to rise. Given this increasingly challenging environment, dealers need greater protections than ever before.”.

Mercedes-Benz has confirmed it’s discontinuing the A-Class sedan in Australia, with the hatchback counterpart remaining on sale for the time being.

The Land Public Transport Agency (APAD) will be keeping an ......

The government has responded to the open market value (OMV) excise ......

Mazda won’t be pressured into price and warranty war

Mazda won’t be pressured into price and warranty war

Mazda Australia will stick with its current pricing and aftersales strategy in the face of generous discounts and longer warranties across the Australian new car market.

“Australia has had a lot of brands present in Australia for a long time, compared to other markets,” Mazda Australia managing director Vinesh Bhindi told CarExpert.

“New entrants coming in have to establish themselves, and they’ve identified a weak point in what they have to offer, so these are countermeasures.

“Just because there’s an expansion of brands coming in, it doesn’t mean we’re going to change our core proposition in the marketplace.

Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now.

“We have never been the cheapest on sticker price, that’s not our strategy.”.

Instead of offering the lowest price, Mazda intends to let its products do the talking.

“There are areas we won’t compromise, one of those areas is safety technology,” explained Mr Bhindi.

“When it comes to product and technology, we want to offer as much choice as we can. That remains our business strategy, and that’s not going to change.”.

In terms of pricing, most Mazda models have either held steady or seen increases – the Mazda 2, BT-50, and CX-3 are all more expensive in 2025.

That trend is likely to continue, , even as an influx of new brands – many from China – and a weaker economy have seen carmakers slash prices to capture market share.

For example, China’s Chery made headlines by launching the Tiggo 4 Pro as Australia’s cheapest SUV, while BYD shocked the ute market with the introduction of the plug-in hybrid (PHEV) Shark 6 for under $60,000 before on-roads.

Each of Australia’s biggest new car segments have been hit by increased competition, from light cars all the way up to large SUVs.

Over the same period, several carmakers have moved to expand their aftersales programs. Back in August, MG showcased it was launching a 10-year, 250,000km warranty, toppling Mitsubishi for the best coverage in Australia.

The tables turned again just a couple weeks ago, when Nissan Australia introduced a 10-year, 300,000km vehicle warranty, which remains the longest of any carmaker in the country.

In addition to extended warranty offerings, brands are adding value in the form of subsidised servicing.

However, Mazda’s aftersales program has remained relatively unchanged throughout. Mazda covers its range of vehicles with a five-year, unlimited-kilometre warranty, plus five years of capped-price servicing and roadside assistance.

It hasn’t signalled any changes to its warranty offering in Australia.

Porsche’s U-turn on an electric-heavy model rollout is closer to becoming reality, with an alleged test mule for the new petrol-powered Macan spied in......

Volkswagen updated the GTI and Golf R for 2025. Both cars have tweaked styling inside and out, and there's more power from the Golf R's turbocharged 2......

’s Best Car, who does not name its source, the uncovered information points to Mazda ditching a rotary powertrain for its new flagsh......

Donald Trump’s proposed Canada, Mexico tariffs could be ‘devastating’ – Ford CEO

Donald Trump’s proposed Canada, Mexico tariffs could be ‘devastating’ – Ford CEO

Ford CEO Jim Farley has warned that US President Donald Trump’s proposed tariffs on Canada and Mexico could have a “devastating” impact on the North American automotive industry.

Speaking at a conference , Mr Farley unveiled the import tariffs – including a 25 per cent tax on goods from the country’s neighbours to the north and south – are more likely to weaken the nation’s carmakers rather than protect them.

“President Trump has talked a lot about making our US auto industry stronger, bringing more production here, more innovation to the US, and if this administration can achieve that it would be, I think, one of the most signature accomplishments,” Mr Farley showcased.

“So far what we’re seeing is a lot of cost and a lot of chaos.”.

Hundreds of new car deals are available through CarExpert right now. Get the experts on your side and score a great deal. Browse now.

“Let’s be real honest: Long-term, 25 per cent tariffs across the Mexican and Canadian border would blow a hole in the US industry that we have never seen.

“Frankly, it gives free rein to South Korean and Japanese and European companies that are bringing [website] to 2 million vehicles into the US that wouldn’t be subject to those Mexican and Canadian tariffs. It would be one of the biggest windfalls for those companies ever.

“Meanwhile, we’re USMCA [United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement]-compliant for almost all of our content… and to have that kind of a size of a tariff would be devastating.”.

At the same conference, General Motors CEO Mary Barra expressed the car giant has “started doing scenario planning and looking at what are the different things we can change, we can move, we can respond”.

“We are prepared when we know exactly what’s going to happen. Of course, if tariffs are longer, there’s additional things that we’ve studied that we know we can do from a capital-efficient way.”.

The tariffs on Mexico and Canada were revealed by President Trump shortly after he was sworn into office last month, and were initially due to be implemented on February 2.

However, following discussions with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum – who have both promised to meet President Trump’s border security demands – the US leader delayed the introduction of the tariffs by 30 days.

A investigation by The New York Times showed General Motors, Stellantis, Toyota and Honda all produce approximately 40 per cent of the vehicles they sell in North America in either Canada or Mexico, while Ford also builds cars and pickups across both nations.

Audi, BMW, Honda, Kia, Mazda, Nissan and Volkswagen all have Mexican car factories which export to the US.

Prime Minister Trudeau had threatened to impose a 25 per cent tariff on C$155 billion (A$[website] worth of US goods, but this has also been delayed pending the outcome of the US tariff decision.

Nissan is the latest to adopt DeepSeek tech for its new EV in China, the N7. The N7 will be the first joint venture brand electric car to feature Deep......

One of the peak bodies in Australia’s automotive industry has claimed car brands could pay a total of $[website] billion in penalties by 2029 if they can’t ......

Volkswagen is spicing up its European portfolio by giving three of its sensible cars the heart of a hot hatchback. From now on, the Tiguan and Tayron ......

Market Impact Analysis

Market Growth Trend

2018201920202021202220232024
8.3%10.0%10.5%11.6%12.3%12.7%12.8%
8.3%10.0%10.5%11.6%12.3%12.7%12.8% 2018201920202021202220232024

Quarterly Growth Rate

Q1 2024 Q2 2024 Q3 2024 Q4 2024
10.9% 11.7% 12.4% 12.8%
10.9% Q1 11.7% Q2 12.4% Q3 12.8% Q4

Market Segments and Growth Drivers

Segment Market Share Growth Rate
Connected Cars35%14.2%
Autonomous Driving22%18.5%
EV Technology28%21.9%
Telematics10%9.7%
Other Automotive Tech5%6.3%
Connected Cars35.0%Autonomous Driving22.0%EV Technology28.0%Telematics10.0%Other Automotive Tech5.0%

Technology Maturity Curve

Different technologies within the ecosystem are at varying stages of maturity:

Innovation Trigger Peak of Inflated Expectations Trough of Disillusionment Slope of Enlightenment Plateau of Productivity AI/ML Blockchain VR/AR Cloud Mobile

Competitive Landscape Analysis

Company Market Share
Tesla16.9%
Waymo12.3%
NVIDIA DRIVE10.7%
Bosch9.5%
Continental7.8%

Future Outlook and Predictions

The Brands Face Billion landscape is evolving rapidly, driven by technological advancements, changing threat vectors, and shifting business requirements. Based on current trends and expert analyses, we can anticipate several significant developments across different time horizons:

Year-by-Year Technology Evolution

Based on current trajectory and expert analyses, we can project the following development timeline:

2024Early adopters begin implementing specialized solutions with measurable results
2025Industry standards emerging to facilitate broader adoption and integration
2026Mainstream adoption begins as technical barriers are addressed
2027Integration with adjacent technologies creates new capabilities
2028Business models transform as capabilities mature
2029Technology becomes embedded in core infrastructure and processes
2030New paradigms emerge as the technology reaches full maturity

Technology Maturity Curve

Different technologies within the ecosystem are at varying stages of maturity, influencing adoption timelines and investment priorities:

Time / Development Stage Adoption / Maturity Innovation Early Adoption Growth Maturity Decline/Legacy Emerging Tech Current Focus Established Tech Mature Solutions (Interactive diagram available in full report)

Innovation Trigger

  • Generative AI for specialized domains
  • Blockchain for supply chain verification

Peak of Inflated Expectations

  • Digital twins for business processes
  • Quantum-resistant cryptography

Trough of Disillusionment

  • Consumer AR/VR applications
  • General-purpose blockchain

Slope of Enlightenment

  • AI-driven analytics
  • Edge computing

Plateau of Productivity

  • Cloud infrastructure
  • Mobile applications

Technology Evolution Timeline

1-2 Years
  • Technology adoption accelerating across industries
  • digital transformation initiatives becoming mainstream
3-5 Years
  • Significant transformation of business processes through advanced technologies
  • new digital business models emerging
5+ Years
  • Fundamental shifts in how technology integrates with business and society
  • emergence of new technology paradigms

Expert Perspectives

Leading experts in the automotive tech sector provide diverse perspectives on how the landscape will evolve over the coming years:

"Technology transformation will continue to accelerate, creating both challenges and opportunities."

— Industry Expert

"Organizations must balance innovation with practical implementation to achieve meaningful results."

— Technology Analyst

"The most successful adopters will focus on business outcomes rather than technology for its own sake."

— Research Director

Areas of Expert Consensus

  • Acceleration of Innovation: The pace of technological evolution will continue to increase
  • Practical Integration: Focus will shift from proof-of-concept to operational deployment
  • Human-Technology Partnership: Most effective implementations will optimize human-machine collaboration
  • Regulatory Influence: Regulatory frameworks will increasingly shape technology development

Short-Term Outlook (1-2 Years)

In the immediate future, organizations will focus on implementing and optimizing currently available technologies to address pressing automotive tech challenges:

  • Technology adoption accelerating across industries
  • digital transformation initiatives becoming mainstream

These developments will be characterized by incremental improvements to existing frameworks rather than revolutionary changes, with emphasis on practical deployment and measurable outcomes.

Mid-Term Outlook (3-5 Years)

As technologies mature and organizations adapt, more substantial transformations will emerge in how security is approached and implemented:

  • Significant transformation of business processes through advanced technologies
  • new digital business models emerging

This period will see significant changes in security architecture and operational models, with increasing automation and integration between previously siloed security functions. Organizations will shift from reactive to proactive security postures.

Long-Term Outlook (5+ Years)

Looking further ahead, more fundamental shifts will reshape how cybersecurity is conceptualized and implemented across digital ecosystems:

  • Fundamental shifts in how technology integrates with business and society
  • emergence of new technology paradigms

These long-term developments will likely require significant technical breakthroughs, new regulatory frameworks, and evolution in how organizations approach security as a fundamental business function rather than a technical discipline.

Key Risk Factors and Uncertainties

Several critical factors could significantly impact the trajectory of automotive tech evolution:

Regulatory approval delays
Battery technology limitations
Consumer trust issues

Organizations should monitor these factors closely and develop contingency strategies to mitigate potential negative impacts on technology implementation timelines.

Alternative Future Scenarios

The evolution of technology can follow different paths depending on various factors including regulatory developments, investment trends, technological breakthroughs, and market adoption. We analyze three potential scenarios:

Optimistic Scenario

Rapid adoption of advanced technologies with significant business impact

Key Drivers: Supportive regulatory environment, significant research breakthroughs, strong market incentives, and rapid user adoption.

Probability: 25-30%

Base Case Scenario

Measured implementation with incremental improvements

Key Drivers: Balanced regulatory approach, steady technological progress, and selective implementation based on clear ROI.

Probability: 50-60%

Conservative Scenario

Technical and organizational barriers limiting effective adoption

Key Drivers: Restrictive regulations, technical limitations, implementation challenges, and risk-averse organizational cultures.

Probability: 15-20%

Scenario Comparison Matrix

FactorOptimisticBase CaseConservative
Implementation TimelineAcceleratedSteadyDelayed
Market AdoptionWidespreadSelectiveLimited
Technology EvolutionRapidProgressiveIncremental
Regulatory EnvironmentSupportiveBalancedRestrictive
Business ImpactTransformativeSignificantModest

Transformational Impact

Technology becoming increasingly embedded in all aspects of business operations. This evolution will necessitate significant changes in organizational structures, talent development, and strategic planning processes.

The convergence of multiple technological trends—including artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and ubiquitous connectivity—will create both unprecedented security challenges and innovative defensive capabilities.

Implementation Challenges

Technical complexity and organizational readiness remain key challenges. Organizations will need to develop comprehensive change management strategies to successfully navigate these transitions.

Regulatory uncertainty, particularly around emerging technologies like AI in security applications, will require flexible security architectures that can adapt to evolving compliance requirements.

Key Innovations to Watch

Artificial intelligence, distributed systems, and automation technologies leading innovation. Organizations should monitor these developments closely to maintain competitive advantages and effective security postures.

Strategic investments in research partnerships, technology pilots, and talent development will position forward-thinking organizations to leverage these innovations early in their development cycle.

Technical Glossary

Key technical terms and definitions to help understand the technologies discussed in this article.

Understanding the following technical concepts is essential for grasping the full implications of the security threats and defensive measures discussed in this article. These definitions provide context for both technical and non-technical readers.

Filter by difficulty:

hybrid intermediate

algorithm

platform intermediate

interface Platforms provide standardized environments that reduce development complexity and enable ecosystem growth through shared functionality and integration capabilities.

API beginner

platform APIs serve as the connective tissue in modern software architectures, enabling different applications and services to communicate and share data according to defined protocols and data formats.
API concept visualizationHow APIs enable communication between different software systems
Example: Cloud service providers like AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure offer extensive APIs that allow organizations to programmatically provision and manage infrastructure and services.