Technology News from Around the World, Instantly on Oracnoos!

Fixes That Lets: Latest Updates and Analysis

AMD fixes bug that lets hackers load malicious microcode patches

AMD fixes bug that lets hackers load malicious microcode patches

​AMD has released mitigation and firmware updates to address a high-severity vulnerability that can be exploited to load malicious CPU microcode on unpatched devices.

The security flaw (CVE-2024-56161) is caused by an improper signature verification weakness in AMD's CPU ROM microcode patch loader.

Attackers with local administrator privileges can exploit this weakness, resulting in the loss of confidentiality and integrity of a confidential guest running under AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization-Secure Nested Paging (SEV-SNP).

's development resources, SEV isolates guests and the hypervisor from one another, and SEV-SNP adds memory integrity protection that creates an isolated execution environment by helping prevent malicious hypervisor-based attacks ([website], data replay, memory re-mapping, and more).

AMD now provides mitigation requiring a microcode revision on all affected platforms to block malicious microcode execution.

Some platforms also require a SEV firmware enhancement for SEV-SNP attestation, with individuals having to enhancement the system BIOS and reboot to enable attestation of the mitigation.

To confirm that the mitigation has been correctly installed, check whether the microcode version(s) matches the one(s) listed in the table below.

Code Name Family CPUID Naples AMD EPYC 7001 Series 0x00800F12 Rome AMD EPYC 7002 Series 0x00830F10 Milan AMD EPYC 7003 Series 0x00A00F11 Milan-X AMD EPYC 7003 Series 0x00A00F12 Genoa AMD EPYC 9004 Series 0x00A10F11 Genoa-X AMD EPYC 9004 Series 0x00A10F12 Bergamo/Siena AMD EPYC 9004 Series 0x00AA0F02.

"We have demonstrated the ability to craft arbitrary malicious microcode patches on Zen 1 through Zen 4 CPUs. The vulnerability is that the CPU uses an insecure hash function in the signature validation for microcode updates," the Google Security Team noted.

"This vulnerability could be used by an adversary to compromise confidential computing workloads protected by the newest version of AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization, SEV-SNP or to compromise Dynamic Root of Trust Measurement."

Google security researchers, credited with finding and reporting this flaw to AMD, have also shared a proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit (tested on AMD EPYC and AMD Ryzen 9 CPUs) that displays how attackers can create arbitrary microcode patches.

Their PoC exploit makes the RDRAND instruction on vulnerable AMD Zen processors always return 4, which also sets the carry flag (CF) to 0. This indicates that the return value is invalid and ensures the exploit can't be used "to compromise correctly functioning confidential computing workloads."

This week, AMD has also received a research from Li-Chung Chiang at NTU (National Taiwan University) detailing cache-based side-channel attacks against Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) that impact data center (1st Gen to 4th Gen AMD EPYC) and embedded (AMD EPYC 3000/7002/7003/9004) processors.

AMD advised developers to follow best practices for prime and probe attacks ([website], constant-time algorithms), avoid secret-dependent data whenever possible, and follow the guidance regarding Spectre-type attacks.

Cybercriminals are increasingly leveraging legitimate HTTP client tools to facilitate account takeover (ATO) attacks on Microsoft 365 environments.

The North Korean hacking group known as Kimsuky was observed in recent attacks using a custom-built RDP Wrapper and proxy tools to directly access inf......

CISA warned [website] federal agencies on Thursday to secure their systems against ongoing attacks targeting a critical Microsoft Outlook remote code execu......

Critical Cisco ISE bug can let attackers run commands as root

Critical Cisco ISE bug can let attackers run commands as root

Cisco has released patches to fix two critical vulnerabilities in its Identity Services Engine (ISE) security policy management platform.

Enterprise administrators use Cisco ISE as an identity and access management (IAM) solution that combines authentication, authorization, and accounting into a single appliance.

The two security flaws (CVE-2025-20124 and CVE-2025-20125) can be exploited by authenticated remote attackers with read-only admin privileges to execute arbitrary commands as root and bypass authorization on unpatched devices.

These vulnerabilities impact Cisco ISE and Cisco ISE Passive Identity Connector (ISE-PIC) appliances, regardless of device configuration.

"This vulnerability is due to insecure deserialization of user-supplied Java byte streams by the affected software," Cisco noted, describing the CVE-2025-20124 bug tagged with a [website] severity rating.

"An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted serialized Java object to an affected API. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the device and elevate privileges."

CVE-2025-20125 is caused by a lack of authorization in a specific API and improper validation of user-supplied data, which can be exploited using maliciously crafted HTTP requests to obtain information, modify a vulnerable system's configuration, and reload the device.

Admins are advised to migrate or upgrade their Cisco ISE appliances to one of the fixed releases listed in the table below as soon as possible.

Cisco ISE Software Releases First Fixed Release [website] Migrate to a fixed release. [website] [website] [website] [website] [website] [website] [website] Not vulnerable.

Cisco's Product Security Incident Response Team (PSIRT) has yet to discover evidence of publicly available exploit code or that the two critical security flaws () have been abused in attacks.

On Wednesday, the corporation also warned of high-severity vulnerabilities impacting its IOS, IOS XE, IOS XR (CVE-2025-20169, CVE-2025-20170, CVE-2025-20171) and NX-OS (CVE-2024-20397) software that can let attackers trigger denial of service (DoS) conditions or bypass NX-OS image signature verification.

Cisco has yet to patch the DoS vulnerabilities impacting IOS, IOS XE, and IOS XR software with the SNMP feature enabled. However, it introduced they're not exploited in the wild and provided mitigation measures requiring admins to disable vulnerable object identifiers (OIDs) on vulnerable devices (although this could negatively impact network functionality or performance).

The corporation plans to roll out software updates to address the SNMP DoS security bugs in February and March.

In September, Cisco fixed another Identity Services Engine vulnerability (with public exploit code) that lets threat actors escalate privileges to root on vulnerable appliances.

Two months later, it also patched a maximum severity vulnerability that allows attackers to run commands with root privileges on vulnerable Ultra-Reliable Wireless Backhaul (URWB) access points.

A help desk phishing campaign targets an organization's Microsoft Active Directory Federation Services (ADFS) using spoofed login pages to steal crede......

British-based engineering firm IMI plc has disclosed a security breach after unknown attackers hacked into the firm's systems.

A new malware campaign dubbed SparkCat has leveraged a suit of bogus apps on both Apple's and Google's respective app stores to steal victims' mnemoni......

CISA orders agencies to patch Linux kernel bug exploited in attacks

CISA orders agencies to patch Linux kernel bug exploited in attacks

​CISA has ordered federal agencies to secure their systems within three weeks against a high-severity Linux kernel flaw actively exploited in attacks.

Tracked as CVE-2024-53104, the security bug was first introduced in kernel version [website] and was patched by Google for Android people on Monday.

"There are indications that CVE-2024-53104 may be under limited, targeted exploitation," the Android February 2025 Android security updates warn.

's security advisory, this vulnerability is caused by an out-of-bounds write weakness in the USB Video Class (UVC) driver, which allows "physical escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed" on unpatched devices.

The driver's inability to accurately parse UVC_VS_UNDEFINED frames within the uvc_parse_format function triggers the issue, leading to frame buffer size miscalculations and potential out-of-bounds writes.

While Google didn't provide additional information on the zero-day attacks exploiting this vulnerability, the GrapheneOS development team says this USB peripheral driver vulnerability is "likely one of the USB bugs exploited by forensic data extraction tools."

​As mandated by the November 2021 Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01, [website] federal agencies must secure their networks against ongoing attacks targeting flaws added to CISA's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog.

The cybersecurity agency has given Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agencies three weeks to patch their Linux and Android devices by February 26.

"These types of vulnerabilities are frequent attack vectors for malicious cyber actors and pose significant risks to the federal enterprise," CISA warned today.

On Tuesday, CISA also tagged high-severity and critical vulnerabilities in Microsoft .NET Framework and Apache OFBiz (Open For Business) software as actively exploited in the wild. However, it didn't provide details on who was behind the attacks.

With Five Eyes cybersecurity agencies in the UK, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the [website], it also shared security guidance for network edge devices, urging manufacturers to improve forensic visibility to help defenders detect attacks and investigate breaches.

Ransomware attacks have reached an unprecedented scale in the healthcare sector, exposing vulnerabilities that put millions at risk. in recent times, UnitedH......

The North Korean hacking group known as Kimsuky was observed in recent attacks using a custom-built RDP Wrapper and proxy tools to directly access inf......

An ongoing distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack targets Bohemia Interactive's infrastructure, preventing players of DayZ and Arma Reforger from......

Market Impact Analysis

Market Growth Trend

2018201920202021202220232024
8.7%10.5%11.0%12.2%12.9%13.3%13.4%
8.7%10.5%11.0%12.2%12.9%13.3%13.4% 2018201920202021202220232024

Quarterly Growth Rate

Q1 2024 Q2 2024 Q3 2024 Q4 2024
12.5% 12.9% 13.2% 13.4%
12.5% Q1 12.9% Q2 13.2% Q3 13.4% Q4

Market Segments and Growth Drivers

Segment Market Share Growth Rate
Network Security26%10.8%
Cloud Security23%17.6%
Identity Management19%15.3%
Endpoint Security17%13.9%
Other Security Solutions15%12.4%
Network Security26.0%Cloud Security23.0%Identity Management19.0%Endpoint Security17.0%Other Security Solutions15.0%

Technology Maturity Curve

Different technologies within the ecosystem are at varying stages of maturity:

Innovation Trigger Peak of Inflated Expectations Trough of Disillusionment Slope of Enlightenment Plateau of Productivity AI/ML Blockchain VR/AR Cloud Mobile

Competitive Landscape Analysis

Company Market Share
Palo Alto Networks14.2%
Cisco Security12.8%
Crowdstrike9.3%
Fortinet7.6%
Microsoft Security7.1%

Future Outlook and Predictions

The Fixes That Lets landscape is evolving rapidly, driven by technological advancements, changing threat vectors, and shifting business requirements. Based on current trends and expert analyses, we can anticipate several significant developments across different time horizons:

Year-by-Year Technology Evolution

Based on current trajectory and expert analyses, we can project the following development timeline:

2024Early adopters begin implementing specialized solutions with measurable results
2025Industry standards emerging to facilitate broader adoption and integration
2026Mainstream adoption begins as technical barriers are addressed
2027Integration with adjacent technologies creates new capabilities
2028Business models transform as capabilities mature
2029Technology becomes embedded in core infrastructure and processes
2030New paradigms emerge as the technology reaches full maturity

Technology Maturity Curve

Different technologies within the ecosystem are at varying stages of maturity, influencing adoption timelines and investment priorities:

Time / Development Stage Adoption / Maturity Innovation Early Adoption Growth Maturity Decline/Legacy Emerging Tech Current Focus Established Tech Mature Solutions (Interactive diagram available in full report)

Innovation Trigger

  • Generative AI for specialized domains
  • Blockchain for supply chain verification

Peak of Inflated Expectations

  • Digital twins for business processes
  • Quantum-resistant cryptography

Trough of Disillusionment

  • Consumer AR/VR applications
  • General-purpose blockchain

Slope of Enlightenment

  • AI-driven analytics
  • Edge computing

Plateau of Productivity

  • Cloud infrastructure
  • Mobile applications

Technology Evolution Timeline

1-2 Years
  • Technology adoption accelerating across industries
  • digital transformation initiatives becoming mainstream
3-5 Years
  • Significant transformation of business processes through advanced technologies
  • new digital business models emerging
5+ Years
  • Fundamental shifts in how technology integrates with business and society
  • emergence of new technology paradigms

Expert Perspectives

Leading experts in the cyber security sector provide diverse perspectives on how the landscape will evolve over the coming years:

"Technology transformation will continue to accelerate, creating both challenges and opportunities."

— Industry Expert

"Organizations must balance innovation with practical implementation to achieve meaningful results."

— Technology Analyst

"The most successful adopters will focus on business outcomes rather than technology for its own sake."

— Research Director

Areas of Expert Consensus

  • Acceleration of Innovation: The pace of technological evolution will continue to increase
  • Practical Integration: Focus will shift from proof-of-concept to operational deployment
  • Human-Technology Partnership: Most effective implementations will optimize human-machine collaboration
  • Regulatory Influence: Regulatory frameworks will increasingly shape technology development

Short-Term Outlook (1-2 Years)

In the immediate future, organizations will focus on implementing and optimizing currently available technologies to address pressing cyber security challenges:

  • Technology adoption accelerating across industries
  • digital transformation initiatives becoming mainstream

These developments will be characterized by incremental improvements to existing frameworks rather than revolutionary changes, with emphasis on practical deployment and measurable outcomes.

Mid-Term Outlook (3-5 Years)

As technologies mature and organizations adapt, more substantial transformations will emerge in how security is approached and implemented:

  • Significant transformation of business processes through advanced technologies
  • new digital business models emerging

This period will see significant changes in security architecture and operational models, with increasing automation and integration between previously siloed security functions. Organizations will shift from reactive to proactive security postures.

Long-Term Outlook (5+ Years)

Looking further ahead, more fundamental shifts will reshape how cybersecurity is conceptualized and implemented across digital ecosystems:

  • Fundamental shifts in how technology integrates with business and society
  • emergence of new technology paradigms

These long-term developments will likely require significant technical breakthroughs, new regulatory frameworks, and evolution in how organizations approach security as a fundamental business function rather than a technical discipline.

Key Risk Factors and Uncertainties

Several critical factors could significantly impact the trajectory of cyber security evolution:

Evolving threat landscape
Skills shortage
Regulatory compliance complexity

Organizations should monitor these factors closely and develop contingency strategies to mitigate potential negative impacts on technology implementation timelines.

Alternative Future Scenarios

The evolution of technology can follow different paths depending on various factors including regulatory developments, investment trends, technological breakthroughs, and market adoption. We analyze three potential scenarios:

Optimistic Scenario

Rapid adoption of advanced technologies with significant business impact

Key Drivers: Supportive regulatory environment, significant research breakthroughs, strong market incentives, and rapid user adoption.

Probability: 25-30%

Base Case Scenario

Measured implementation with incremental improvements

Key Drivers: Balanced regulatory approach, steady technological progress, and selective implementation based on clear ROI.

Probability: 50-60%

Conservative Scenario

Technical and organizational barriers limiting effective adoption

Key Drivers: Restrictive regulations, technical limitations, implementation challenges, and risk-averse organizational cultures.

Probability: 15-20%

Scenario Comparison Matrix

FactorOptimisticBase CaseConservative
Implementation TimelineAcceleratedSteadyDelayed
Market AdoptionWidespreadSelectiveLimited
Technology EvolutionRapidProgressiveIncremental
Regulatory EnvironmentSupportiveBalancedRestrictive
Business ImpactTransformativeSignificantModest

Transformational Impact

Technology becoming increasingly embedded in all aspects of business operations. This evolution will necessitate significant changes in organizational structures, talent development, and strategic planning processes.

The convergence of multiple technological trends—including artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and ubiquitous connectivity—will create both unprecedented security challenges and innovative defensive capabilities.

Implementation Challenges

Technical complexity and organizational readiness remain key challenges. Organizations will need to develop comprehensive change management strategies to successfully navigate these transitions.

Regulatory uncertainty, particularly around emerging technologies like AI in security applications, will require flexible security architectures that can adapt to evolving compliance requirements.

Key Innovations to Watch

Artificial intelligence, distributed systems, and automation technologies leading innovation. Organizations should monitor these developments closely to maintain competitive advantages and effective security postures.

Strategic investments in research partnerships, technology pilots, and talent development will position forward-thinking organizations to leverage these innovations early in their development cycle.

Technical Glossary

Key technical terms and definitions to help understand the technologies discussed in this article.

Understanding the following technical concepts is essential for grasping the full implications of the security threats and defensive measures discussed in this article. These definitions provide context for both technical and non-technical readers.

Filter by difficulty:

zero-day intermediate

algorithm These vulnerabilities are particularly dangerous because defenders have no time to develop and deploy patches before exploitation occurs. They are highly valued in both offensive security markets and criminal underground.
Zero-day vulnerability timelineTimeline showing vulnerability discovery to patch development
Example: The SUNBURST attack exploited a zero-day vulnerability in SolarWinds Orion software, remaining undetected for months while compromising numerous government agencies and private organizations.

ransomware beginner

interface Ransomware typically encrypts victim data using strong cryptographic algorithms, making recovery impossible without the decryption key. Advanced variants now also exfiltrate data before encryption, enabling double-extortion tactics.
Example: The REvil ransomware group leveraged a supply chain attack against Kaseya VSA to deploy ransomware to thousands of organizations simultaneously, demanding a $70 million ransom payment.

API beginner

platform APIs serve as the connective tissue in modern software architectures, enabling different applications and services to communicate and share data according to defined protocols and data formats.
API concept visualizationHow APIs enable communication between different software systems
Example: Cloud service providers like AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure offer extensive APIs that allow organizations to programmatically provision and manage infrastructure and services.

IAM intermediate

encryption

malware beginner

API Malware can take many forms including viruses, worms, trojans, ransomware, spyware, adware, and rootkits. Modern malware often employs sophisticated evasion techniques to avoid detection by security solutions.
Types of malwareCommon malware types and their characteristics
Example: The Emotet trojan began as banking malware but evolved into a delivery mechanism for other malware types, demonstrating how sophisticated malware can adapt and change functionality over time.

platform intermediate

cloud computing Platforms provide standardized environments that reduce development complexity and enable ecosystem growth through shared functionality and integration capabilities.

algorithm intermediate

middleware

phishing beginner

scalability Modern phishing attacks are increasingly sophisticated, often leveraging AI to create convincing spear-phishing campaigns that target specific individuals with personalized content that appears legitimate.
Phishing attack flowAnatomy of a typical phishing attack
Example: Business Email Compromise (BEC) attacks are sophisticated phishing campaigns where attackers impersonate executives to trick employees into transferring funds or sensitive information.

DDoS intermediate

DevOps