Technology News from Around the World, Instantly on Oracnoos!

Microsoft SharePoint Connector Flaw Could've Enabled Credential Theft Across Power Platform - Related to concerns, connector, log, over, bans

DeepSeek AI Database Exposed: Over 1 Million Log Lines, Secret Keys Leaked

DeepSeek AI Database Exposed: Over 1 Million Log Lines, Secret Keys Leaked

Buzzy Chinese artificial intelligence (AI) startup DeepSeek, which has had a meteoric rise in popularity in recent days, left one of its databases exposed on the internet, which could have allowed malicious actors to gain access to sensitive data.

The exposure also includes more than a million lines of log streams containing chat history, secret keys, backend details, and other highly sensitive information, such as API Secrets and operational metadata. DeepSeek has since plugged the security hole following attempts by the cloud security firm to contact them.

The database, hosted at oauth2callback.deepseek[.]com:9000 and dev.deepseek[.]com:9000, is stated to have enabled unauthorized access to a wide range of information. The exposure, Wiz noted, allowed for complete database control and potential privilege escalation within the DeepSeek environment without requiring any authentication.

"The rapid adoption of AI services without corresponding security is inherently risky," Nagli presented in a statement shared with The Hacker News. "While much of the attention around AI security is focused on futuristic threats, the real dangers often come from basic risks—like the accidental external exposure of databases."

"Protecting customer data must remain the top priority for security teams, and it is crucial that security teams work closely with AI engineers to safeguard data and prevent exposure."

DeepSeek has become the topic du jour in AI circles for its groundbreaking open-source models that claim to rival leading AI systems like OpenAI, while also being efficient and cost-effective. Its reasoning model R1 has been hailed as "AI's Sputnik moment."

The upstart's AI chatbot has raced to the top of the app store charts across Android and iOS in several markets, even as it has emerged as the target of "large-scale malicious attacks," prompting it to temporarily pause registrations.

In an enhancement , 2025, the organization expressed it has identified the issue and that it's working towards implementing a fix.

At the same time, the organization has also been at the receiving end of scrutiny about its privacy policies, not to mention its Chinese ties becoming a matter of national security concern for the United States.

Furthermore, DeepSeek's apps became unavailable in Italy shortly after the country's data protection regulator, the Garante, requested information about its data handling practices and where it obtained its training data. It's not known if the withdrawal of the apps was in response to questions from the watchdog. A similar request has been sent by the Irish Data Protection Commission (DPC) as well.

Bloomberg, Financial Times, and The Wall Street Journal have also reported that both OpenAI and Microsoft are probing whether DeepSeek used OpenAI's application programming interface (API) without permission to train its own models on the output of OpenAI's systems, an approach referred to as distillation.

"We know that groups in [China] are actively working to use methods, including what's known as distillation, to try to replicate advanced US AI models," an OpenAI spokesperson told The Guardian.

Cybersecurity researchers have discovered a malvertising campaign that's targeting Microsoft advertisers with bogus Google ads that aim to take them t......

The [website] Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have issued alerts about the presence of h......

The US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) is warning that Contec CMS8000 devices, a widely used healthcare patient monitoring dev......

Italy Bans Chinese DeepSeek AI Over Data Privacy and Ethical Concerns

Italy Bans Chinese DeepSeek AI Over Data Privacy and Ethical Concerns

Italy's data protection watchdog has blocked Chinese artificial intelligence (AI) firm DeepSeek's service within the country, citing a lack of information on its use of consumers' personal data.

The development comes days after the authority, the Garante, sent a series of questions to DeepSeek, asking about its data handling practices and where it obtained its training data.

In particular, it wanted to know what personal data is collected by its web platform and mobile app, from which findings, for what purposes, on what legal basis, and whether it is stored in China.

In a statement issued January 30, 2025, the Garante introduced it arrived at the decision after DeepSeek provided information that it introduced was "completely insufficient."

The entities behind the service, Hangzhou DeepSeek Artificial Intelligence and Beijing DeepSeek Artificial Intelligence, have "declared that they do not operate in Italy and that European legislation does not apply to them," it added.

As a result, the watchdog unveiled it's blocking access to DeepSeek with immediate effect, and that it's simultaneously opening a probe.

In 2023, the data protection authority also issued a temporary ban on OpenAI's ChatGPT, a restriction that was lifted in late April after the artificial intelligence (AI) firm stepped in to address the data privacy concerns raised. Subsequently, OpenAI was fined €15 million over how it handled personal data.

News of DeepSeek's ban comes as the enterprise has been riding the wave of popularity this week, with millions of people flocking to the service and sending its mobile apps to the top of the download charts.

Adding to the challenges, DeepSeek's large language models (LLM) have been found to be susceptible to jailbreak techniques like Crescendo, Bad Likert Judge, Deceptive Delight, Do Anything Now (DAN), and EvilBOT, thereby allowing bad actors to generate malicious or prohibited content.

"They elicited a range of harmful outputs, from detailed instructions for creating dangerous items like Molotov cocktails to generating malicious code for attacks like SQL injection and lateral movement," Palo Alto Networks Unit 42 expressed in a Thursday analysis.

"While DeepSeek's initial responses often appeared benign, in many cases, carefully crafted follow-up prompts often exposed the weakness of these initial safeguards. The LLM readily provided highly detailed malicious instructions, demonstrating the potential for these seemingly innocuous models to be weaponized for malicious purposes."

Further evaluation of DeepSeek's reasoning model, DeepSeek-R1, by AI security business HiddenLayer, has uncovered that it's not only vulnerable to prompt injections but also that its Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning can lead to inadvertent information leakage.

In an interesting twist, the firm noted the model also "surfaced multiple instances suggesting that OpenAI data was incorporated, raising ethical and legal concerns about data sourcing and model originality."

The disclosure also follows the discovery of a jailbreak vulnerability in OpenAI ChatGPT-4o dubbed Time Bandit that makes it possible for an attacker to get around the safety guardrails of the LLM by prompting the chatbot with questions in a manner that makes it lose its temporal awareness. OpenAI has since mitigated the problem.

"An attacker can exploit the vulnerability by beginning a session with ChatGPT and prompting it directly about a specific historical event, historical time period, or by instructing it to pretend it is assisting the user in a specific historical event," the CERT Coordination Center (CERT/CC) stated.

"Once this has been established, the user can pivot the received responses to various illicit topics through subsequent prompts."

Similar jailbreak flaws have also been identified in Alibaba's Qwen [website] model and GitHub's Copilot coding assistant, the latter of which grant threat actors the ability to sidestep security restrictions and produce harmful code simply by including words like "sure" in the prompt.

"Starting queries with affirmative words like 'Sure' or other forms of confirmation acts as a trigger, shifting Copilot into a more compliant and risk-prone mode," Apex researcher Oren Saban expressed. "This small tweak is all it takes to unlock responses that range from unethical suggestions to outright dangerous advice."

Apex introduced it also found another vulnerability in Copilot's proxy configuration that it introduced could be exploited to fully circumvent access limitations without paying for usage and even tamper with the Copilot system prompt, which serves as the foundational instructions that dictate the model's behavior.

The attack, however, hinges on capturing an authentication token associated with an active Copilot license, prompting GitHub to classify it as an abuse issue following responsible disclosure.

"The proxy bypass and the positive affirmation jailbreak in GitHub Copilot are a perfect example of how even the most powerful AI tools can be abused without adequate safeguards," Saban added.

BeyondTrust has revealed it completed an investigation into a recent cybersecurity incident that targeted some of the enterprise's Remote Support SaaS in......

An international law enforcement operation has dismantled the domains associated with various online platforms linked to cybercrime such as Cracked, N......

The US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) is warning that Contec CMS8000 devices, a widely used healthcare patient monitoring dev......

Microsoft SharePoint Connector Flaw Could've Enabled Credential Theft Across Power Platform

Microsoft SharePoint Connector Flaw Could've Enabled Credential Theft Across Power Platform

Cybersecurity researchers have disclosed details of a now-patched vulnerability impacting the Microsoft SharePoint connector on Power Platform that, if successfully exploited, could allow threat actors to harvest a user's credentials and stage follow-on attacks.

This could manifest in the form of post-exploitation actions that allow the attacker to send requests to the SharePoint API on behalf of the impersonated user, enabling unauthorized access to sensitive data, Zenity Labs stated in a findings shared with The Hacker News ahead of publication.

"This vulnerability can be exploited across Power Automate, Power Apps, Copilot Studio, and Copilot 365, which significantly broadens the scope of potential damage," senior security researcher Dmitry Lozovoy mentioned.

"It increases the likelihood of a successful attack, allowing hackers to target multiple interconnected services within the Power Platform ecosystem."

Following responsible disclosure in September 2024, Microsoft addressed the security hole, assessed with an "crucial" severity assessment, as of December 13.

Microsoft Power Platform is a collection of low-code development tools that allow people to facilitate analytics, process automation, and data-driven productivity applications.

The vulnerability, at its core, is an instance of server-side request forgery (SSRF) stemming from the use of the "custom value" functionality within the SharePoint connector that permits an attacker to insert their own URLs as part of a flow.

However, in order for the attack to be successful, the rogue user will need to have an Environment Maker role and the Basic User role in Power Platform. This also means that they would need to first gain access to a target organization through other means and acquire these roles.

"With the Environment Maker role, they can create and share malicious resources like apps and flows," Zenity told The Hacker News. "The Basic User role allows them to run apps and interact with resources they own in Power Platform. If the attacker doesn't already have these roles, they would need to gain them first."

In a hypothetical attack scenario, a threat actor could create a flow for a SharePoint action and share it with a low-privileged user (read victim), resulting in a leak of their SharePoint JWT access token.

Armed with this captured token, the attacker could send requests outside of the Power Platform on behalf of the user to whom access was granted to.

That's not all. The vulnerability could be extended further to other services like Power Apps and Copilot Studio by creating a seemingly benign Canvas app or a Copilot agent to harvest a user's token, and escalate access further.

"You can take this even further by embedding the Canvas app into a Teams channel, for example," Zenity noted. "Once consumers interact with the app in Teams, you can harvest their tokens just as easily, expanding your reach across the organization and making the attack even more widespread."

"The main takeaway is that the interconnected nature of Power Platform services can result in serious security risks, especially given the widespread use of the SharePoint connector, which is where a lot of sensitive corporate data is housed, and it can be complicated to ensure proper access rights are maintained throughout various environments."

The development comes as Binary Security detailed three SSRF vulnerabilities in Azure DevOps that could have been abused to communicate with the metadata API endpoints, thereby permitting an attacker to glean information about the machine's configuration.

As the gateways to corporate networks, VPNs are an attractive target for attackers seeking access to...

​Food delivery corporation GrubHub disclosed a data breach impacting the personal information of an undi...

Cybersecurity researchers have called attention to a software supply chain attack targeting the Go e...

Market Impact Analysis

Market Growth Trend

2018201920202021202220232024
8.7%10.5%11.0%12.2%12.9%13.3%13.4%
8.7%10.5%11.0%12.2%12.9%13.3%13.4% 2018201920202021202220232024

Quarterly Growth Rate

Q1 2024 Q2 2024 Q3 2024 Q4 2024
12.5% 12.9% 13.2% 13.4%
12.5% Q1 12.9% Q2 13.2% Q3 13.4% Q4

Market Segments and Growth Drivers

Segment Market Share Growth Rate
Network Security26%10.8%
Cloud Security23%17.6%
Identity Management19%15.3%
Endpoint Security17%13.9%
Other Security Solutions15%12.4%
Network Security26.0%Cloud Security23.0%Identity Management19.0%Endpoint Security17.0%Other Security Solutions15.0%

Technology Maturity Curve

Different technologies within the ecosystem are at varying stages of maturity:

Innovation Trigger Peak of Inflated Expectations Trough of Disillusionment Slope of Enlightenment Plateau of Productivity AI/ML Blockchain VR/AR Cloud Mobile

Competitive Landscape Analysis

Company Market Share
Palo Alto Networks14.2%
Cisco Security12.8%
Crowdstrike9.3%
Fortinet7.6%
Microsoft Security7.1%

Future Outlook and Predictions

The Deepseek Over Database landscape is evolving rapidly, driven by technological advancements, changing threat vectors, and shifting business requirements. Based on current trends and expert analyses, we can anticipate several significant developments across different time horizons:

Year-by-Year Technology Evolution

Based on current trajectory and expert analyses, we can project the following development timeline:

2024Early adopters begin implementing specialized solutions with measurable results
2025Industry standards emerging to facilitate broader adoption and integration
2026Mainstream adoption begins as technical barriers are addressed
2027Integration with adjacent technologies creates new capabilities
2028Business models transform as capabilities mature
2029Technology becomes embedded in core infrastructure and processes
2030New paradigms emerge as the technology reaches full maturity

Technology Maturity Curve

Different technologies within the ecosystem are at varying stages of maturity, influencing adoption timelines and investment priorities:

Time / Development Stage Adoption / Maturity Innovation Early Adoption Growth Maturity Decline/Legacy Emerging Tech Current Focus Established Tech Mature Solutions (Interactive diagram available in full report)

Innovation Trigger

  • Generative AI for specialized domains
  • Blockchain for supply chain verification

Peak of Inflated Expectations

  • Digital twins for business processes
  • Quantum-resistant cryptography

Trough of Disillusionment

  • Consumer AR/VR applications
  • General-purpose blockchain

Slope of Enlightenment

  • AI-driven analytics
  • Edge computing

Plateau of Productivity

  • Cloud infrastructure
  • Mobile applications

Technology Evolution Timeline

1-2 Years
  • Technology adoption accelerating across industries
  • digital transformation initiatives becoming mainstream
3-5 Years
  • Significant transformation of business processes through advanced technologies
  • new digital business models emerging
5+ Years
  • Fundamental shifts in how technology integrates with business and society
  • emergence of new technology paradigms

Expert Perspectives

Leading experts in the cyber security sector provide diverse perspectives on how the landscape will evolve over the coming years:

"Technology transformation will continue to accelerate, creating both challenges and opportunities."

— Industry Expert

"Organizations must balance innovation with practical implementation to achieve meaningful results."

— Technology Analyst

"The most successful adopters will focus on business outcomes rather than technology for its own sake."

— Research Director

Areas of Expert Consensus

  • Acceleration of Innovation: The pace of technological evolution will continue to increase
  • Practical Integration: Focus will shift from proof-of-concept to operational deployment
  • Human-Technology Partnership: Most effective implementations will optimize human-machine collaboration
  • Regulatory Influence: Regulatory frameworks will increasingly shape technology development

Short-Term Outlook (1-2 Years)

In the immediate future, organizations will focus on implementing and optimizing currently available technologies to address pressing cyber security challenges:

  • Technology adoption accelerating across industries
  • digital transformation initiatives becoming mainstream

These developments will be characterized by incremental improvements to existing frameworks rather than revolutionary changes, with emphasis on practical deployment and measurable outcomes.

Mid-Term Outlook (3-5 Years)

As technologies mature and organizations adapt, more substantial transformations will emerge in how security is approached and implemented:

  • Significant transformation of business processes through advanced technologies
  • new digital business models emerging

This period will see significant changes in security architecture and operational models, with increasing automation and integration between previously siloed security functions. Organizations will shift from reactive to proactive security postures.

Long-Term Outlook (5+ Years)

Looking further ahead, more fundamental shifts will reshape how cybersecurity is conceptualized and implemented across digital ecosystems:

  • Fundamental shifts in how technology integrates with business and society
  • emergence of new technology paradigms

These long-term developments will likely require significant technical breakthroughs, new regulatory frameworks, and evolution in how organizations approach security as a fundamental business function rather than a technical discipline.

Key Risk Factors and Uncertainties

Several critical factors could significantly impact the trajectory of cyber security evolution:

Evolving threat landscape
Skills shortage
Regulatory compliance complexity

Organizations should monitor these factors closely and develop contingency strategies to mitigate potential negative impacts on technology implementation timelines.

Alternative Future Scenarios

The evolution of technology can follow different paths depending on various factors including regulatory developments, investment trends, technological breakthroughs, and market adoption. We analyze three potential scenarios:

Optimistic Scenario

Rapid adoption of advanced technologies with significant business impact

Key Drivers: Supportive regulatory environment, significant research breakthroughs, strong market incentives, and rapid user adoption.

Probability: 25-30%

Base Case Scenario

Measured implementation with incremental improvements

Key Drivers: Balanced regulatory approach, steady technological progress, and selective implementation based on clear ROI.

Probability: 50-60%

Conservative Scenario

Technical and organizational barriers limiting effective adoption

Key Drivers: Restrictive regulations, technical limitations, implementation challenges, and risk-averse organizational cultures.

Probability: 15-20%

Scenario Comparison Matrix

FactorOptimisticBase CaseConservative
Implementation TimelineAcceleratedSteadyDelayed
Market AdoptionWidespreadSelectiveLimited
Technology EvolutionRapidProgressiveIncremental
Regulatory EnvironmentSupportiveBalancedRestrictive
Business ImpactTransformativeSignificantModest

Transformational Impact

Technology becoming increasingly embedded in all aspects of business operations. This evolution will necessitate significant changes in organizational structures, talent development, and strategic planning processes.

The convergence of multiple technological trends—including artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and ubiquitous connectivity—will create both unprecedented security challenges and innovative defensive capabilities.

Implementation Challenges

Technical complexity and organizational readiness remain key challenges. Organizations will need to develop comprehensive change management strategies to successfully navigate these transitions.

Regulatory uncertainty, particularly around emerging technologies like AI in security applications, will require flexible security architectures that can adapt to evolving compliance requirements.

Key Innovations to Watch

Artificial intelligence, distributed systems, and automation technologies leading innovation. Organizations should monitor these developments closely to maintain competitive advantages and effective security postures.

Strategic investments in research partnerships, technology pilots, and talent development will position forward-thinking organizations to leverage these innovations early in their development cycle.

Technical Glossary

Key technical terms and definitions to help understand the technologies discussed in this article.

Understanding the following technical concepts is essential for grasping the full implications of the security threats and defensive measures discussed in this article. These definitions provide context for both technical and non-technical readers.

Filter by difficulty:

API beginner

algorithm APIs serve as the connective tissue in modern software architectures, enabling different applications and services to communicate and share data according to defined protocols and data formats.
API concept visualizationHow APIs enable communication between different software systems
Example: Cloud service providers like AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure offer extensive APIs that allow organizations to programmatically provision and manage infrastructure and services.

platform intermediate

interface Platforms provide standardized environments that reduce development complexity and enable ecosystem growth through shared functionality and integration capabilities.

DevOps intermediate

platform

interface intermediate

encryption Well-designed interfaces abstract underlying complexity while providing clearly defined methods for interaction between different system components.

zero-day intermediate

API These vulnerabilities are particularly dangerous because defenders have no time to develop and deploy patches before exploitation occurs. They are highly valued in both offensive security markets and criminal underground.
Zero-day vulnerability timelineTimeline showing vulnerability discovery to patch development
Example: The SUNBURST attack exploited a zero-day vulnerability in SolarWinds Orion software, remaining undetected for months while compromising numerous government agencies and private organizations.

SOC intermediate

cloud computing