Google Patches 47 Android Security Flaws, Including Actively Exploited CVE-2024-53104 - Related to patch, including, exploited, flaws,, azure
Google Patches 47 Android Security Flaws, Including Actively Exploited CVE-2024-53104
Google has shipped patches to address 47 security flaws in its Android operating system, including one it showcased has come under active exploitation in the wild.
The vulnerability in question is CVE-2024-53104 (CVSS score: [website], which has been described as a case of privilege escalation in a kernel component known as the USB Video Class (UVC) driver.
Successful exploitation of the flaw could lead to physical escalation of privilege, Google stated, noting that it's aware that it may be under "limited, targeted exploitation."
While no other technical details have been offered, Linux kernel developer Greg Kroah-Hartman revealed in early December 2024 that the vulnerability is rooted in the Linux kernel and that it was introduced in version [website], which was released in mid-2008.
Specifically, it has to do with an out-of-bounds write condition that could arise as a result of parsing frames of type UVC_VS_UNDEFINED in a function named "uvc_parse_format()" in the "[website]" program.
This also means that the flaw could be weaponized to result in memory corruption, program crash, or arbitrary code execution.
It's not currently not clear who is behind the exploitation of the vulnerability, although the fact that it could facilitate "physical" privilege escalation implies possible misuse by forensic data extraction tools, per GrapheneOS.
Also patched as part of Google's monthly security updates is a critical flaw in Qualcomm's WLAN component (CVE-2024-45569, CVSS score: [website] that could also lead to memory corruption.
It's worth noting that Google has released two security patch levels, 2025-02-01 and 2025-02-05, so as to give flexibility to Android partners to address a portion of vulnerabilities that are similar across all Android devices more quickly.
"Android partners are encouraged to fix all issues in this bulletin and use the latest security patch level," Google expressed.
As cloud security evolves in 2025 and beyond, organizations must adapt to both new and evolving real...
Food delivery firm GrubHub disclosed a data breach impacting the personal information of an undi...
Netgear has fixed two critical vulnerabilities affecting multiple WiFi router models and urged custo...
iPhone Users Urged to Update to Patch 2 Zero-Days
Separate fixes to macOS and iOS patch respective flaws in the kernel and WebKit that can allow threat actors to take over devices and are under attack.
Apple is urging macOS, iPhone and iPad individuals immediately to install respective updates this week that includes fixes for two zero-days under active attack. The patches are for vulnerabilities that allow attackers to execute arbitrary code and ultimately take over devices.
Patches are available for effected devices running iOS [website] and macOS Monterey [website] Patches address two flaws, which basically impact any Apple device that can run either iOS 15 or the Monterey version of its desktop OS, .
One of the flaws is a kernel bug (CVE-2022-32894), which is present both in iOS and macOS. “out-of-bounds write issue [that] was addressed with improved bounds checking.”.
The vulnerability allows an application to execute arbitrary code with kernel privileges, , which, in usual vague fashion, mentioned there is a findings that it “may have been actively exploited.”.
The second flaw is identified as a WebKit bug (tracked as CVE-2022-32893), which is an out-of-bounds write issue that Apple addressed with improved bounds checking. The flaw allows for processing maliciously crafted web content that can lead to code execution, and also has been reported to be under active exploit, . WebKit is the browser engine that powers Safari and all other third-party browsers that work on iOS.
The discovery of both flaws, about which little more beyond Apple’s disclosure are known, was credited to an anonymous researcher.
One expert expressed worry that the latest Apple flaws “could effectively give attackers full access to device,” they might create a Pegasus-like scenario similar to the one in which nation-state APTs barraged targets with spyware made by Israeli NSO Group by exploiting an iPhone vulnerability.
“For most folks: improvement software by end of day,” tweeted Rachel Tobac, the CEO of SocialProof Security, regarding the zero-days. “If threat model is elevated (journalist, activist, targeted by nation states, etc): improvement now,” Tobac warned.
The flaws were unveiled alongside other news from Google this week that it was patching its fifth zero-day so far this year for its Chrome browser, an arbitrary code execution bug under active attack.
The news of yet more vulnerabilities from top tech vendors being barraged by threat actors demonstrates that despite the best efforts from top-tier tech companies to address perennial security issues in their software, it remains an uphill battle, noted Andrew Whaley, senior technical director at Promon, a Norwegian app security corporation.
The flaws in iOS are especially worrying, given the ubiquity of iPhones and consumers’ utter reliance on mobile devices for their daily lives, he noted. However, the onus is not only on vendors to protect these devices but also for consumers to be more aware of existing threats, Whaley observed.
“While we all rely on our mobile devices, they are not invulnerable, and as individuals we need to maintain our guard just like we do on desktop operating systems,” he expressed in an email to Threatpost.
At the same time, developers of apps for iPhones and other mobile devices also should add an extra layer of security controls in their technology so they are less reliant on OS security for protection, given the flaws that frequently crop up, Whaley observed.
“Our experience presents that this is not happening enough, potentially leaving banking and other clients vulnerable,” he expressed.
An insufficient validation input flaw, one of 11 patched in an revision this week, could allow for arb...
Brazilian Windows individuals are the target of a campaign that delivers a banking malware known as Coyote...
A 7-Zip vulnerability allowing attackers to bypass the Mark of the Web (MotW) Windows security featu...
Microsoft Patches Critical Azure AI Face Service Vulnerability with CVSS 9.9 Score
Microsoft has released patches to address two Critical-rated security flaws impacting Azure AI Face Service and Microsoft Account that could allow a malicious actor to escalate their privileges under certain conditions.
CVE-2025-21396 (CVSS score: [website] - Microsoft Account Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability.
(CVSS score: [website] - Microsoft Account Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability CVE-2025-21415 (CVSS score: [website] - Azure AI Face Service Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability.
"Authentication bypass by spoofing in Azure AI Face Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network," Microsoft in an advisory for CVE-2025-21415, crediting an anonymous researcher for reporting the flaw.
CVE-2025-21396, on the other hand, stems from a case of missing authorization that could permit an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network. A security researcher who goes by the alias Sugobet has been acknowledged for discovering it.
The tech giant also noted that it's aware of the existence of a proof-of-concept (PoC) exploit code for CVE-2025-21415, adding both vulnerabilities have been fully mitigated. The shortcomings require no customer action.
The advisories are part of Microsoft's ongoing efforts to improve transparency by issuing CVEs for critical cloud service vulnerabilities, irrespective of whether end-customers need to install a patch or take other actions to secure themselves.
"As our industry matures and increasingly migrates to cloud-based services, we must be transparent about significant cybersecurity vulnerabilities that are found and fixed," it noted back in June 2024.
"By openly sharing information about vulnerabilities that are discovered and resolved, we enable Microsoft and our partners to learn and improve. This collaborative effort contributes to the safety and resilience of our critical infrastructure."
[website] turns 15 years old today! Maybe it’s indelicate to celebrate the birthday of a c...
Five Eyes cybersecurity agencies in the UK, Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the [website] have issued...
A security vulnerability has been disclosed in AMD's Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) that coul...
Market Impact Analysis
Market Growth Trend
| 2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.7% | 10.5% | 11.0% | 12.2% | 12.9% | 13.3% | 13.4% |
Quarterly Growth Rate
| Q1 2024 | Q2 2024 | Q3 2024 | Q4 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12.5% | 12.9% | 13.2% | 13.4% |
Market Segments and Growth Drivers
| Segment | Market Share | Growth Rate |
|---|---|---|
| Network Security | 26% | 10.8% |
| Cloud Security | 23% | 17.6% |
| Identity Management | 19% | 15.3% |
| Endpoint Security | 17% | 13.9% |
| Other Security Solutions | 15% | 12.4% |
Technology Maturity Curve
Different technologies within the ecosystem are at varying stages of maturity:
Competitive Landscape Analysis
| Company | Market Share |
|---|---|
| Palo Alto Networks | 14.2% |
| Cisco Security | 12.8% |
| Crowdstrike | 9.3% |
| Fortinet | 7.6% |
| Microsoft Security | 7.1% |
Future Outlook and Predictions
The Patches Google Android landscape is evolving rapidly, driven by technological advancements, changing threat vectors, and shifting business requirements. Based on current trends and expert analyses, we can anticipate several significant developments across different time horizons:
Year-by-Year Technology Evolution
Based on current trajectory and expert analyses, we can project the following development timeline:
Technology Maturity Curve
Different technologies within the ecosystem are at varying stages of maturity, influencing adoption timelines and investment priorities:
Innovation Trigger
- Generative AI for specialized domains
- Blockchain for supply chain verification
Peak of Inflated Expectations
- Digital twins for business processes
- Quantum-resistant cryptography
Trough of Disillusionment
- Consumer AR/VR applications
- General-purpose blockchain
Slope of Enlightenment
- AI-driven analytics
- Edge computing
Plateau of Productivity
- Cloud infrastructure
- Mobile applications
Technology Evolution Timeline
- Technology adoption accelerating across industries
- digital transformation initiatives becoming mainstream
- Significant transformation of business processes through advanced technologies
- new digital business models emerging
- Fundamental shifts in how technology integrates with business and society
- emergence of new technology paradigms
Expert Perspectives
Leading experts in the cyber security sector provide diverse perspectives on how the landscape will evolve over the coming years:
"Technology transformation will continue to accelerate, creating both challenges and opportunities."
— Industry Expert
"Organizations must balance innovation with practical implementation to achieve meaningful results."
— Technology Analyst
"The most successful adopters will focus on business outcomes rather than technology for its own sake."
— Research Director
Areas of Expert Consensus
- Acceleration of Innovation: The pace of technological evolution will continue to increase
- Practical Integration: Focus will shift from proof-of-concept to operational deployment
- Human-Technology Partnership: Most effective implementations will optimize human-machine collaboration
- Regulatory Influence: Regulatory frameworks will increasingly shape technology development
Short-Term Outlook (1-2 Years)
In the immediate future, organizations will focus on implementing and optimizing currently available technologies to address pressing cyber security challenges:
- Technology adoption accelerating across industries
- digital transformation initiatives becoming mainstream
These developments will be characterized by incremental improvements to existing frameworks rather than revolutionary changes, with emphasis on practical deployment and measurable outcomes.
Mid-Term Outlook (3-5 Years)
As technologies mature and organizations adapt, more substantial transformations will emerge in how security is approached and implemented:
- Significant transformation of business processes through advanced technologies
- new digital business models emerging
This period will see significant changes in security architecture and operational models, with increasing automation and integration between previously siloed security functions. Organizations will shift from reactive to proactive security postures.
Long-Term Outlook (5+ Years)
Looking further ahead, more fundamental shifts will reshape how cybersecurity is conceptualized and implemented across digital ecosystems:
- Fundamental shifts in how technology integrates with business and society
- emergence of new technology paradigms
These long-term developments will likely require significant technical breakthroughs, new regulatory frameworks, and evolution in how organizations approach security as a fundamental business function rather than a technical discipline.
Key Risk Factors and Uncertainties
Several critical factors could significantly impact the trajectory of cyber security evolution:
Organizations should monitor these factors closely and develop contingency strategies to mitigate potential negative impacts on technology implementation timelines.
Alternative Future Scenarios
The evolution of technology can follow different paths depending on various factors including regulatory developments, investment trends, technological breakthroughs, and market adoption. We analyze three potential scenarios:
Optimistic Scenario
Rapid adoption of advanced technologies with significant business impact
Key Drivers: Supportive regulatory environment, significant research breakthroughs, strong market incentives, and rapid user adoption.
Probability: 25-30%
Base Case Scenario
Measured implementation with incremental improvements
Key Drivers: Balanced regulatory approach, steady technological progress, and selective implementation based on clear ROI.
Probability: 50-60%
Conservative Scenario
Technical and organizational barriers limiting effective adoption
Key Drivers: Restrictive regulations, technical limitations, implementation challenges, and risk-averse organizational cultures.
Probability: 15-20%
Scenario Comparison Matrix
| Factor | Optimistic | Base Case | Conservative |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implementation Timeline | Accelerated | Steady | Delayed |
| Market Adoption | Widespread | Selective | Limited |
| Technology Evolution | Rapid | Progressive | Incremental |
| Regulatory Environment | Supportive | Balanced | Restrictive |
| Business Impact | Transformative | Significant | Modest |
Transformational Impact
Technology becoming increasingly embedded in all aspects of business operations. This evolution will necessitate significant changes in organizational structures, talent development, and strategic planning processes.
The convergence of multiple technological trends—including artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and ubiquitous connectivity—will create both unprecedented security challenges and innovative defensive capabilities.
Implementation Challenges
Technical complexity and organizational readiness remain key challenges. Organizations will need to develop comprehensive change management strategies to successfully navigate these transitions.
Regulatory uncertainty, particularly around emerging technologies like AI in security applications, will require flexible security architectures that can adapt to evolving compliance requirements.
Key Innovations to Watch
Artificial intelligence, distributed systems, and automation technologies leading innovation. Organizations should monitor these developments closely to maintain competitive advantages and effective security postures.
Strategic investments in research partnerships, technology pilots, and talent development will position forward-thinking organizations to leverage these innovations early in their development cycle.
Technical Glossary
Key technical terms and definitions to help understand the technologies discussed in this article.
Understanding the following technical concepts is essential for grasping the full implications of the security threats and defensive measures discussed in this article. These definitions provide context for both technical and non-technical readers.
platform intermediate
SOC intermediate
zero-day intermediate
Timeline showing vulnerability discovery to patch developmentmalware beginner
Common malware types and their characteristicsRelated Articles
