Samsung might finally end battery size woes with Galaxy S26 series - Related to end, series, win, a, you
Intel needed a win — its new laptop CPU delivers just that

Table of Contents Table of Contents By the numbers Insane efficiency Intel needed a win.
It feels cliche at this point, but it’s true. Intel can’t catch a break. The new Arrow Lake-H chips feel like a tide shift for Team Blue, though, leveraging the highly efficient architectures the business debuted with Lunar Lake to deliver performance and battery life worthy of the best laptops on the market.
We’ve already seen what Intel’s Lunar Lake processors are capable of — read our Asus Zenbook S 14 review for more on that — but. These new Arrow Lake-H offerings are a bit different. Under the hood, Intel is still using its Lion Cove and Skymont core architectures, which Arrow Lake-H shares with Lunar Lake. However, these chips get a larger core count, higher power budget, and. Beefier integrated graphics based on Intel’s Battlemage architecture.
The power budget is really crucial here. The base power is 45W, but Intel allows the chip to boost up to 115W for short periods of time. The core split is interesting, too. You get 16 total cores, but they’re split between six performance cores, eight efficient cores, and two low-power efficient cores. If you remember, the efficient cores are actually the main performance driver in this architecture. So the extra two low-power ones are simply there for a little extra multi-core grunt.
I’ve brought in a few comparisons from AMD here. First is an identical laptop packing the Ryzen AI 9 365 — which Intel compares the Core Ultra 9 285H to — and. Second is an Asus Zenbook S 16 with a beefier Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. These are 10-core and 12-core CPUs, respectively, but they use simultaneous multi-threading. The Core Ultra 9 285H doesn’t, so while Intel has a core advantage, AMD actually has a thread advantage.
MSI Prestige 16 (Core Ultra 9 285H) MSI Prestige 16 (Ryzen 9 AI 365) Asus Zenbook S 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370) Cinebench R24 (single/multi) 128 / 918 111 / 819 110 / 871 Geekbench 6 (single/multi) 2,776 / 15,773 2,832 / 14,059 N/A PCMark 10 7,508 7,352 7,229 PugetBench for Photoshop 7,717 7,656 7,248 PugetBench for Premiere Pro 3,520 3,107 2,971 3DMark Time Spy 4,018 3,565 3,207 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 3,494 3,088 3,219.
Intel’s approach clearly works, as you can see in both Cinebench and. Geekbench. These apps typically favor a thread advantage, but Intel is still coming out on top. That’s probably due to a solid lead in single-core speed, which you can see in Cinebench.
PCMark 10 is a bit different. With all three laptops more or less falling in the same range. That’s not too surprising. These are high-end CPUs in some of the best laptops money can buy, so of course they can handle basic office and. Productivity tasks with ease.
The difference makers are Photoshop and Premiere. Intel is providing a slight edge in Photoshop, but there’s a massive boost in Premiere. The Battlemage GPU is certainly helping there, along with QuickSync. Gaming sees a huge boost, as well — frankly, AMD isn’t even close with its integrated graphics, at least until we see the Ryzen AI MAX chips later this year.
Intel is no stranger to performance, and. Frankly, it’s not impressive that Intel can outclass the competition (especially considering the larger power budget). What is impressive is that Intel is able to deliver this level of performance while keeping its battery life in check.
It was very strange queuing up a video to loop on the Core Ultra 9 285H when I left work, only to find it still looping the next morning. And with around half the battery to spare. That’s the kind of efficiency Intel is offering here and without any of the typical tricks in Windows that kick in when the battery gets low enough.
In local video playback, I got nearly 21 hours of battery life out of the MSI Prestige 16 — 20 hours and. 46 minutes, to be exact. For context, the Acer Swift 14 AI with the Ryzen AI 9 365 managed 18 hours and 36 minutes, the MacBook Air M3 lasted 19 hours and 29 minutes. And the HP Omnibook X with the Snapdragon X Elite stayed on for 22 hours and 4 minutes. The Snapdragon chip comes out on top, but Intel is damn close considering this is a 16-core flagship chip.
I expected decent battery life given that Intel is using the same core architectures as its Lunar Lake offerings, but with more cores and. A higher budget, I didn’t expect this Arrow Lake-H chip to be as close as it is to Intel’s Lunar Lake offerings. Not only is Intel’s performance fantastic here — its battery life holds up equally as well.
Something struck me when testing Intel’s new Arrow Lake-H chip. It just worked. Intel has really struggled to catch a break, and although its Lunar Lake laptop chips were a small highlight. They weren’t enough to reverse the narrative established by the desktop Arrow Lake range. Arrow Lake-H makes a lot of sense, though, and it proves Intel was onto something when it decided to focus on efficiency. Now, finally, we can see how Intel is able to scale its design to deliver great performance and battery life in a single package.
It’s a great change of pace for Intel, who up to this point struggled to provide a clean ramp between performance and. Efficiency in laptops, rather splitting the ranges in half with two completely different approaches to architecture. Arrow Lake-H feels like everything coming together, and for a firm that’s been promising that everything will come together soon for years, that’s a big win.
Leadership isn’t about doing everything, but. Making sure the right things get done, with or without you in the room, says Beerud Sheth.
. eu database, European tech companies raised € billion throughout January 2025. In comparison to the same period in previous y...
While EA's Madden football games often top sales charts every year, those sales haven't reflected quality. The critical consensus on the series has be...
Samsung might finally end battery size woes with Galaxy S26 series

Samsung smartphones might soon fix the worst chink in their armor. , the enterprise is mulling plans to fit next-gen silicon carbide batteries inside its upcoming Galaxy S26 series flagship smartphones. And it seems the Chaebol’s mobile division won’t be pulling any punches.
As per the study citing industry insiders. Samsung could offer a battery as large as 6,000-7,000 mAh in capacity with the upcoming Galaxy S26 series. For comparison, Samsung’s current top-tier offering, the Galaxy S25 Ultra, comes equipped with a 5,000mAh battery. The competition, however, is already offering batteries of up to 7,000mAh capacity at nearly half the sticker price of Samsung’s flagships.
The Korean electronics giant is reportedly keen on deriving benefits of the silicon carbide battery tech, which promises higher energy density. Allowing brands to fit high-capacity batteries in smaller packages. Take for example the Red Magic 10 Pro, a phone that is nearly as big as the Galaxy S25 Ultra, but offers a 7,000 mAh battery with 100W fast charging chops.
Samsung. However, is concerned about the hit on battery longevity. To fix that conundrum, the corporation is reportedly planning to experiment with different material choices, and adjusting the percentage concentration of silicon in the battery anode to achieve a denser. Longer-lasting battery.
Please enable Javascript to view this content.
Another advantage of silicon carbide batteries is that they don’t hamper the charging pace figures. For example, brands like OnePlus and Honor have already managed to fit massive batteries in their latest flagships while simultaneously offering charging rates north of 80W in wired mode.
To put that into perspective, Samsung’s current-gen phones only go up to 45W in wired mode. And far slower in wireless format. The OnePlus 13, on the other hand, allows 50W wireless charging, while Samsung’s best phones can only muster a peak top-up rate of 15W.
Now. The latest analysis emerging from Samsung’s home market isn’t a certainty that the Galaxy S26 series will finally put an end to arguably the weakest aspect of Samsung smartphones. The shift might take another year, or two, even. But it is definitely reassuring to see that Samsung is paying attention to practical innovations and. Might not remain a laggard for longer than it can afford to.
The business’s mobile division certainly appears to be chalking the right course lately. As per Counterpoint Research data, the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra marked the first time since 2018 that a Samsung Galaxy device has entered the top ten list of the world’s highest-selling smartphones each year.
Sennheiser’s latest open-back, wired headphones put a greater emphasis on comfort and. Premium style, while keeping a relatively budget-friendly price ...
January 2025's top 10 European tech deals you need to know about

. eu database, European tech companies raised € billion throughout January 2025. In comparison to the same period in previous years, January 2025 experienced a notable decline of about 60 per cent compared to 2024, but an increase of roughly 40 per cent compared to 2023.
Harry Haeck, Partner at Smartfin, commented on the January numbers within the European tech investment landscape in our January Pulse. A compact version of the monthly research:
The new year began with a major shift in AI as China’s DeepSeek released its open-source R1 model, challenging well-funded AI giants. This marks a fundamental shift in AI economics, allowing European startups to develop competitive AI solutions at a fraction of previous costs. By reducing reliance on massive data centres and expensive model training, it lowers barriers to entry and presents a rare opportunity for Europe to regain ground in AI development. Provided startups and investors act swiftly. With modest rate cuts and stablising inflation on the horizon, optimism around venture capital activity is growing. At Smartfin, we remain optimistic and well-capitalised, ready to support Europe’s next wave of innovation. 2025 is off to a volatile yet promising start - adaptability will be key.
For his more detailed review and more in-depth analyses of the European tech ecosystem, including industry and country performance, exit activities, and more, check out our January analysis.
And here is the list of 10 biggest European tech deals in January which collected together around 51 per cent of the total amount collected this month.
The Oppo Find X8 Mini is expected to launch in March alongside the Find X8 and the Find X8 Pro, but we haven’t had much information on its specs. Desi...
Founded in 2019 by Saloni Anand and Altaf Saiyed, Traya specialises in personalised hair care solutions, addressing individual customer hair issues th...
Market Impact Analysis
Market Growth Trend
2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12.0% | 14.4% | 15.2% | 16.8% | 17.8% | 18.3% | 18.5% |
Quarterly Growth Rate
Q1 2024 | Q2 2024 | Q3 2024 | Q4 2024 |
---|---|---|---|
16.8% | 17.5% | 18.2% | 18.5% |
Market Segments and Growth Drivers
Segment | Market Share | Growth Rate |
---|---|---|
Digital Transformation | 31% | 22.5% |
IoT Solutions | 24% | 19.8% |
Blockchain | 13% | 24.9% |
AR/VR Applications | 18% | 29.5% |
Other Innovations | 14% | 15.7% |
Technology Maturity Curve
Different technologies within the ecosystem are at varying stages of maturity:
Competitive Landscape Analysis
Company | Market Share |
---|---|
Amazon Web Services | 16.3% |
Microsoft Azure | 14.7% |
Google Cloud | 9.8% |
IBM Digital | 8.5% |
Salesforce | 7.9% |
Future Outlook and Predictions
The Intel Needed Laptop landscape is evolving rapidly, driven by technological advancements, changing threat vectors, and shifting business requirements. Based on current trends and expert analyses, we can anticipate several significant developments across different time horizons:
Year-by-Year Technology Evolution
Based on current trajectory and expert analyses, we can project the following development timeline:
Technology Maturity Curve
Different technologies within the ecosystem are at varying stages of maturity, influencing adoption timelines and investment priorities:
Innovation Trigger
- Generative AI for specialized domains
- Blockchain for supply chain verification
Peak of Inflated Expectations
- Digital twins for business processes
- Quantum-resistant cryptography
Trough of Disillusionment
- Consumer AR/VR applications
- General-purpose blockchain
Slope of Enlightenment
- AI-driven analytics
- Edge computing
Plateau of Productivity
- Cloud infrastructure
- Mobile applications
Technology Evolution Timeline
- Technology adoption accelerating across industries
- digital transformation initiatives becoming mainstream
- Significant transformation of business processes through advanced technologies
- new digital business models emerging
- Fundamental shifts in how technology integrates with business and society
- emergence of new technology paradigms
Expert Perspectives
Leading experts in the digital innovation sector provide diverse perspectives on how the landscape will evolve over the coming years:
"Technology transformation will continue to accelerate, creating both challenges and opportunities."
— Industry Expert
"Organizations must balance innovation with practical implementation to achieve meaningful results."
— Technology Analyst
"The most successful adopters will focus on business outcomes rather than technology for its own sake."
— Research Director
Areas of Expert Consensus
- Acceleration of Innovation: The pace of technological evolution will continue to increase
- Practical Integration: Focus will shift from proof-of-concept to operational deployment
- Human-Technology Partnership: Most effective implementations will optimize human-machine collaboration
- Regulatory Influence: Regulatory frameworks will increasingly shape technology development
Short-Term Outlook (1-2 Years)
In the immediate future, organizations will focus on implementing and optimizing currently available technologies to address pressing digital innovation challenges:
- Technology adoption accelerating across industries
- digital transformation initiatives becoming mainstream
These developments will be characterized by incremental improvements to existing frameworks rather than revolutionary changes, with emphasis on practical deployment and measurable outcomes.
Mid-Term Outlook (3-5 Years)
As technologies mature and organizations adapt, more substantial transformations will emerge in how security is approached and implemented:
- Significant transformation of business processes through advanced technologies
- new digital business models emerging
This period will see significant changes in security architecture and operational models, with increasing automation and integration between previously siloed security functions. Organizations will shift from reactive to proactive security postures.
Long-Term Outlook (5+ Years)
Looking further ahead, more fundamental shifts will reshape how cybersecurity is conceptualized and implemented across digital ecosystems:
- Fundamental shifts in how technology integrates with business and society
- emergence of new technology paradigms
These long-term developments will likely require significant technical breakthroughs, new regulatory frameworks, and evolution in how organizations approach security as a fundamental business function rather than a technical discipline.
Key Risk Factors and Uncertainties
Several critical factors could significantly impact the trajectory of digital innovation evolution:
Organizations should monitor these factors closely and develop contingency strategies to mitigate potential negative impacts on technology implementation timelines.
Alternative Future Scenarios
The evolution of technology can follow different paths depending on various factors including regulatory developments, investment trends, technological breakthroughs, and market adoption. We analyze three potential scenarios:
Optimistic Scenario
Rapid adoption of advanced technologies with significant business impact
Key Drivers: Supportive regulatory environment, significant research breakthroughs, strong market incentives, and rapid user adoption.
Probability: 25-30%
Base Case Scenario
Measured implementation with incremental improvements
Key Drivers: Balanced regulatory approach, steady technological progress, and selective implementation based on clear ROI.
Probability: 50-60%
Conservative Scenario
Technical and organizational barriers limiting effective adoption
Key Drivers: Restrictive regulations, technical limitations, implementation challenges, and risk-averse organizational cultures.
Probability: 15-20%
Scenario Comparison Matrix
Factor | Optimistic | Base Case | Conservative |
---|---|---|---|
Implementation Timeline | Accelerated | Steady | Delayed |
Market Adoption | Widespread | Selective | Limited |
Technology Evolution | Rapid | Progressive | Incremental |
Regulatory Environment | Supportive | Balanced | Restrictive |
Business Impact | Transformative | Significant | Modest |
Transformational Impact
Technology becoming increasingly embedded in all aspects of business operations. This evolution will necessitate significant changes in organizational structures, talent development, and strategic planning processes.
The convergence of multiple technological trends—including artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and ubiquitous connectivity—will create both unprecedented security challenges and innovative defensive capabilities.
Implementation Challenges
Technical complexity and organizational readiness remain key challenges. Organizations will need to develop comprehensive change management strategies to successfully navigate these transitions.
Regulatory uncertainty, particularly around emerging technologies like AI in security applications, will require flexible security architectures that can adapt to evolving compliance requirements.
Key Innovations to Watch
Artificial intelligence, distributed systems, and automation technologies leading innovation. Organizations should monitor these developments closely to maintain competitive advantages and effective security postures.
Strategic investments in research partnerships, technology pilots, and talent development will position forward-thinking organizations to leverage these innovations early in their development cycle.
Technical Glossary
Key technical terms and definitions to help understand the technologies discussed in this article.
Understanding the following technical concepts is essential for grasping the full implications of the security threats and defensive measures discussed in this article. These definitions provide context for both technical and non-technical readers.