Looking for a cheap Google TV Streamer alternative? There’s really only one option in 2025 - Related to itel, a, power, 7, flip

Itel launches the Power 70: a budget-friendly phone with a big battery

The Itel Power 70 looks like a pretty nice overall package. First, let's tackle its claim to fame – the battery capacity. The phone has a pretty big but reasonably sized 6,000 mAh onboard battery. That allows it to maintain sensible proportions, measuring x x mm and tipping the scale at 200 grams. The "trick" here is the additional 4,000 mAh charging case that Itel is throwing in as a launch gift with the phone. This extends the total battery capacity to 10,000 mAh (not counting charging loss). The Power 70 does not support wireless charging, so the case has to connect up to the phone's Type-C port and make use of its 18W wired charging capabilities.

Speaking of price, the Itel Power 70. Including the charging case, will cost under $85. That's quite a bargain price. Of course, you can't expect amazing hardware for this price, but at least on paper, the Power 70 looks well-rounded. It has a HD+, 120Hz LCD with a peak brightness of 700 nits. Itel calls it a "Sunlight Display," claiming that it should be good even in direct sunlight. We have our doubts. Itel also says that the display "supports wet and oily touch control".

The rest of the specs include a MediaTek Helio G50 Ultimate chipset. It is paired with up to 8GB of RAM. The available storage options are 4GB/128GB, 6GB/128GB, 8GB/128GB, 4GB/256GB, 8GB/256GB. The storage is, unfortunately, eMMC , but at least it is expandable via a microSD card.

The camera department includes a single 13MP rear camera and. A single 8MP selfie camera. Video capture is expectedly limited to 1080p. You also get two Nano-SIM slots, a single loudspeaker, a audio jack, and a side-mounted fingerprint reader. Unfortunately, there is no NFC.

As mentioned, the Power 70 costs around $85, including the charging case. Though that might just be a launch gift, we aren't sure. You can choose from black, silver, marine and gold colors.

If you're seeing this message, that means JavaScript has been disabled on your browser.

Please enable JavaScript to make this website work...

A few days after its Chinese launch. The Xiaomi 15 Ultra is going global. The global version has some subtle differences, though.

Honor’s new Watch 5 Ultra is a gorgeous piece of hardware, but. Various issues with the software just left me wanting to go back to Wear OS.

The good and bad of Samsung’s Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Flip 7 leaks

The last few days have been pretty busy for Samsung folding phone news. On Monday, leaked renders and specs gave us our first good look at the Galaxy Z Fold 7. A couple of days later, we got similar leaks for the Galaxy Z Flip 7. Following minor year-over-year upgrades with the Fold 6 and Flip 6, how are things looking for Samsung’s next series of foldables?

Right now. It’s shaping up to be a mixed bag. It looks like we’re in for another year of familiar designs, but. At least some of the spec upgrades are exciting — at least for one of the phones. The other? Not so much.

We’re still early on in the rumor mill for both phones. So everything here needs to be taken with a fair bit of skepticism. But assuming these leaks are an accurate glimpse at what’s to come, 2025 may be a frustrating year to be a Samsung foldable fan.

What do you think about the Galaxy Z Fold 7 and. Z Flip 7 leaks? 143 votes Both phones look great! 29 % They look fine. 19 % Not great, I was hoping for bigger upgrades. 52 %.

The Galaxy Z Fold 7 looks like a (mostly) solid upgrade.

Let’s start on a positive note. At first glance, the Galaxy Z Fold 7 doesn’t look like a massive overhaul of the Galaxy Z Fold 6. And that’s because it isn’t. However, there are enough changes here that I’m more interested in the phone than I was a week ago.

Perhaps the biggest upgrade over the Fold 6 is the display size. The Galaxy Z Fold 7 is purported to have an inner display — much larger than the screen on the Z Fold 6. An display would secure the Fold 7 as having the largest screen on a bookstyle foldable, even beating the panel on the OPPO Find N5. Although Samsung has reduced the inner screen’s bezels each year, it’s had the same display measurement since the Galaxy Z Fold 2. A jump to inches would be significant.

And even with the display size increase, Samsung is also on track to make the Fold 7 notably thinner than the Fold 6 — supposedly measuring just thick when opened compared to for its predecessor. Although the OPPO Find N5 would still have the crown as the thinnest foldable in this class. Shedding almost a full millimeter while increasing the inner display by over half an inch is no small feat on Samsung’s part. The cover display may get a bump, too, possibly going from inches to inches.

Also impressive is the rumored 200-megapixel primary camera that may finally replace the aging 50MP camera used on the Fold 6 (and the Fold 5 and. Fold 4 before it). The Fold 6’s main camera isn’t bad, but it’s nothing special, either. The Z Fold has been long overdue for a new primary camera sensor, so to hear we might get one on the Fold 7 is exciting.

The rumored display, thinness. And camera changes are genuinely exciting.

What’s not so exciting? We’re likely looking at unchanged battery and charging specs, meaning a 4400mAh battery and 25W wired charge speeds. Not only are those the exact specs we’ve had since the Fold 3, but other foldables have blown Samsung out of the water. The HONOR Magic V3 has a 5150mAh battery and 66W wired charging, while the OPPO Find N5 has a 5600mAh battery and 80W wired charging — and both are thinner than the Z Fold 7’s reported thickness, measuring and. , respectively.

The overall design isn’t much different from the last few Z Fold generations, either. While less of a concern to me as the stagnant battery and charging specs, a fresh coat of paint is long overdue.

With Samsung supposedly making impactful changes to the Fold 7. Surely that means similar attention is being spent on the Z Flip 7 … right? Unfortunately, it doesn’t look that way.

Like the Fold 7, Samsung is expected to enlarge the Flip 7 displays — taking the cover screen and inner screen from the Galaxy Z Flip 6 and increasing them to inches and inches, respectively. On the Flip 7.

That’s good to see, but unlike the potentially class-leading screen size for the Fold 7, this would still put the Flip 7 well behind the competition. Last year’s Motorola Razr Plus (2024) not only has a larger 4-inch cover screen, but the resolution. Brightness, and refresh rate are miles ahead of the Flip 6. There’s no mention of other cover display upgrades for the Z Flip 7 beyond the larger size, and if that’s the case. That’ll be a tough pill to swallow.

The Z Flip 7 also reportedly has upgraded camera sensors, though the extent of those upgrades is unclear. Like the Flip 6, the Flip 7 is rumored to have a 50MP primary camera and a 12MP ultrawide camera. The potential for new sensors is promising, but I’m hesitant about how impactful they’ll be given the identical-sounding setup.

And that’s about it for the Flip 7. There aren’t any expected changes to battery capacity, charge speeds, RAM, or storage. I don’t know about you, but that doesn’t sound all that promising to me.

A mixed bag for Samsung’s 2025 foldables.

It’s worth reiterating that these are all leaks and. Rumored info. Not only that, but we’re still months away from the expected release of the Galaxy Z Fold 7 and Flip 7 this summer. That’s all to say we don’t have a perfectly clear picture of how these phones will shake out and we’ll continue to learn more about them in the weeks and months ahead.

But based on what we know today, I can’t help but. Feel torn about these phones.

The Galaxy Z Fold 7 has some really promising upgrades, yet other aspects are getting far too long in the tooth. Larger screens for the Flip 7 are good to see, but if that and some minor camera tweaks are all we’re getting. That’s hardly an exciting upgrade.

It all leaves me feeling mixed about Samsung’s 2025 foldable lineup; not overly enthusiastic or disappointed. I want Samsung to wow me with its foldables like it used to, and looking at these latest leaks, I’m not there yet.

Honor has committed to providing seven years of Android operating system...

After a chip is manufactured, testing is done to measure its clock speed, power consumption. The number of working cores, and more. After testing, the...

Samsung is setting the benchmark for support on mid-range and affordable smartphones – the new A-series (A16 and. Up) will receive 6 OS updates. This g...

Looking for a cheap Google TV Streamer alternative? There’s really only one option in 2025

The Chromecast has been my preferred way to stream on my TV since 2013, but. When Google released the Google TV Streamer last year, it became clear that those days were numbered. Just as expected, Google has now officially stopped selling the Chromecast with Google TV HD and 4K. For those who prefer a cheap streaming device, the discontinuation of the Chromecast leaves a significant gap in the market. While there are still great options from Roku and Amazon, there’s really only one viable alternative if you prefer Google TV — the Onn 4K Pro.

One caveat is that the Onn 4K Pro is sold through a partnership with Walmart and. Is available only in North America. If you live outside this market, you either spring for the Google TV Streamer or pick up a Chromecast with Google TV from a retailer with remaining stock.

To be fair, the Onn 4K Pro is not the only official option available in 2025, but. I’ve looked around, and every other affordable box is either three or more years old or more of a makeshift mini-PC running Android than a proper Google TV device. In contrast, the Onn 4K Pro arrived just last year, so it’s fairly young by comparison.

While the Onn 4K Pro has its positives, is it really a worthwhile alternative. Or are you enhanced off saving up for the Google TV Streamer instead? Honestly, after spending many months with it, I think it depends on what kind of user you are and how much tinkering you’re willing to do.

Would you pick the Onn 4K Pro. Or stick with the aging Chromecast with Google TV? 95 votes I'd stick to the Chromecast, as I don't trust the Onn brand. 25 % The Onn 4K Pro is a improved deal, even if it's potentially quirky. 48 % Neither, I'd save up extra or wait for a sale before getting the Google TV Streamer. 26 %.

The Onn 4K Pro stands out in a few key ways.

When I first reviewed the Onn 4K Pro ($ at Walmart) in the summer of 2024, I was clear that, at least in terms of capabilities and. General performance, it was a much more compelling device than the Chromecast with Google TV.

Here are just a few of the biggest advantages the Onn 4K Pro has over the Chromecast: Hands-free voice support : This is a feature not even the Google TV Streamer offers! A simple “Ok, Google” lets you browse the UI, turn smart devices on and off. And even find the remote.

: This is a feature not even the Google TV Streamer offers! A simple “Ok, Google” lets you browse the UI, turn smart devices on and off, and even find the remote. Remote finder feature : As mentioned, there’s a handy remote-finding function. Not only can you activate it via voice command, but there’s also a physical button on the front of the Onn 4K Pro box. This feature has since made its way to the Google TV Streamer, too.

: As mentioned, there’s a handy remote-finding function. Not only can you activate it via voice command, but there’s also a physical button on the front of the Onn 4K Pro box. This feature has since made its way to the Google TV Streamer, too. A superior remote : While the remote isn’t as nice as you’d get with the Google TV Streamer, it’s an improvement over the Chromecast remote. It elements a customizable button and is easier to grip than the slippery Chromecast remote, though the plastic feels a bit cheaper.

: While the remote isn’t as nice as you’d get with the Google TV Streamer. It’s an improvement over the Chromecast remote. It aspects a customizable button and is easier to grip than the slippery Chromecast remote, though the plastic feels a bit cheaper. A USB port: I’ve found the USB port great for sideloading local media, and even accessories like webcams and. Gamepads are compatible — though my webcam’s performance was inconsistent, so your mileage may vary. Beyond these aspects, the Onn 4K Pro also boasts a more powerful processor than the Chromecast with Google TV, 3GB of RAM (compared to 2GB on the Chromecast 4K). And quadruple the storage at 32GB. While I often had to aggressively manage apps on my Chromecast, the Onn 4K Pro has plenty of room. And, as mentioned, there’s a USB port if you need additional temporary storage or want to back up files.

Even if Google hadn’t discontinued the Chromecast with Google TV. I’d still recommend the Onn 4K Pro. Right now, it’s the closest thing we have to a “Google TV Streamer Lite.” Unfortunately, there is a dark side to the Onn 4K Pro: its reliability isn’t guaranteed.

The Onn 4K Pro’s long-term reliability is a concern.

Most Onn products are fairly decent, but these are budget products, so the quality. Consistency, and long-term reliability can be hit-or-miss. The same applies to the Onn 4K Pro. After nearly nine months of ownership, I’ve encountered a few issues with my unit.

For the first four or five months, the device worked flawlessly. Over time, however, I started noticing quirks that gradually worsened. It began with the remote finder button occasionally failing to respond. Eventually, the button stopped glowing entirely, taking the physical remote finder function with it. Thankfully, the remote finder voice command still worked.

A couple of weeks later, I noticed that the Onn 4K Pro could no longer wake my TV. Requiring me to turn it on manually. My PlayStation 5 had no such issue, so I knew the problem was specific to the Onn device. I put up with these inconveniences for a while, but when I started experiencing performance slowdowns, I decided to investigate further.

The Onn 4K Pro is feature-packed, but not without a few quirks.

I tried clearing the cache, uninstalling unnecessary apps, and. Performing general maintenance, but ultimately, I had to factory reset the device. Thankfully, everything worked perfectly fine afterward.

The Onn 4K Pro continued running smoothly for another two and a half months before problems resurfaced. Forcing another reset. To be fair, during that second period, I had been experimenting with sideloading a few emulators and other apps. So I may have been the real issue here. Still, it’s worth mentioning.

Is it reasonable to have to factory reset a device every two to six months just to keep it running? Maybe, maybe not. It depends on how much you mind tinkering, I suppose.

To be fair. Even my Chromecast with Google TV needed a factory reset after about a year. It had become sluggish, likely due to limited RAM and high storage usage. Deleting apps and clearing space didn’t help much, and in the end, a reset was necessary.

At the end of the day. Any sub-$50 streaming device is bound to have some drawbacks. Whether or not those issues are dealbreakers is up to you.

Are you enhanced off just getting the Google TV Streamer?

The Onn 4K Pro is a great device, but. Its quirks can get tiring. I’ve in recent times considered replacing it in our living room with a Google TV Streamer, which is simply the superior product — despite costing twice as much and. Lacking hands-free voice control and that handy USB port. If you can afford to spend more, I’d absolutely recommend the Google TV Streamer over the Onn 4K Pro or Chromecast with Google TV. Not only is it more reliable, but it should also be more future-proof and get all the latest Google elements first.

For those with a $50 budget. I still stand by the Onn 4K Pro. In fact, when I upgrade to a Google TV Streamer, my Onn 4K Pro won’t be retired; instead. It’ll replace the Chromecast with Google TV in my bedroom. That says a lot about how I rate the Onn 4K Pro against the Chromecast with Google TV.

If you don’t trust Onn or don’t want to deal with potential quirks, here are a few alternatives depending on your situation: If you already own a Chromecast with Google TV : I’d hold on to it a bit longer. As it should receive updates through at least September 2025. By then, the holiday season will be approaching, and the Google TV Streamer could drop to around $75–$85.

: I’d hold on to it a bit longer. As it should receive updates through at least September 2025. By then, the holiday season will be approaching, and the Google TV Streamer could drop to around $75–$85. If you need a budget-friendly streaming device but don’t have a Chromecast: You’re likely more effective off hunting for a Chromecast with Google TV rather than settling for outdated alternatives like the Mi Box S. Many retailers still have stock and are offering aggressive discounts to clear in-store inventory. For example, I not long ago snagged a Chromecast with Google TV 4K from Walmart for just $25. You’ll likely find refurbished or second-hand ones for under $25 soon. Ultimately, the Onn 4K Pro won’t be for everyone, but it remains the best Chromecast alternative if you’re working with a $50 budget. The real question is whether it’s the right fit for you.

Samsung just updated its mid-range models, and. There is quite a bit to go through. It's always fun to look at the corporation's la...

People use artificial intelligence (AI) for various reasons, such as summarizing documents, translating languages. Answering questions, and helping br...

iPad Pro (2024) . Last year Apple released the iPa...