Technology News from Around the World, Instantly on Oracnoos!

Java and Distributed Systems: Implementing Raft Consensus Algorithm - Related to a, implementing, body, acknowledgement, java

Java and Distributed Systems: Implementing Raft Consensus Algorithm

Java and Distributed Systems: Implementing Raft Consensus Algorithm

Distributed systems are at the heart of modern applications, enabling scalability, fault tolerance, and high availability. One of the key challenges in distributed systems is achieving consensus among nodes, especially in the presence of failures. The Raft consensus algorithm is a popular solution for this problem, known for its simplicity and understandability compared to alternatives like Paxos. In this article, we’ll explore how to implement the Raft consensus algorithm in Java to build robust distributed systems.

1. What is the Raft Consensus Algorithm?

Raft is a consensus algorithm designed to be easy to understand and implement. It ensures that a cluster of distributed nodes agrees on a shared state, even in the presence of failures. Raft achieves this by electing a leader who manages the replication of log entries across the cluster. Key concepts in Raft include:

Leader Election : Nodes elect a leader to coordinate updates.

: Nodes elect a leader to coordinate updates. Log Replication : The leader replicates log entries to follower nodes.

: The leader replicates log entries to follower nodes. Safety: Ensures consistency and correctness even during failures.

Raft is widely used in distributed systems for:

Fault Tolerance : Ensures system availability even if some nodes fail.

: Ensures system availability even if some nodes fail. Consistency : Guarantees that all nodes agree on the same state.

: Guarantees that all nodes agree on the same state. Simplicity: Easier to implement and debug compared to Paxos.

Popular systems like etcd and Consul use Raft for consensus.

To implement Raft in Java, we’ll break the process into key components:

Node Roles: Define the roles of Leader, Follower, and Candidate. Leader Election: Implement the election process. Log Replication: Handle log replication from the leader to followers. Communication: Use RPC (Remote Procedure Calls) for node communication.

Each node in the Raft cluster can be in one of three states:

Follower : Passively responds to leader requests.

: Passively responds to leader requests. Candidate : Requests votes to become the leader.

: Requests votes to become the leader. Leader: Handles client requests and manages log replication.

public enum NodeState { FOLLOWER, CANDIDATE, LEADER }.

Leader election is triggered when a follower doesn’t hear from the leader within a timeout period. The node transitions to a Candidate and requests votes from other nodes.

public class RaftNode { private NodeState state = NodeState.FOLLOWER; private int currentTerm = 0; private int votedFor = -1; // ID of the node voted for in the current term public void startElection() { state = NodeState.CANDIDATE; currentTerm++; votedFor = selfId; // Vote for itself requestVotesFromOtherNodes(); } private void requestVotesFromOtherNodes() { // Send RequestVote RPCs to all other nodes for (RaftNode node : clusterNodes) { if (node != this) { boolean voteGranted = node.requestVote(currentTerm, selfId); if (voteGranted) { // Count votes and transition to Leader if majority is achieved } } } }.

Once a leader is elected, it replicates log entries to followers. Followers acknowledge the entries, and the leader commits them once a majority of nodes have replicated the log.

public class RaftNode { private List log = new ArrayList<>(); public void appendEntries(int term, int leaderId, List entries) { if (term >= currentTerm) { state = NodeState.FOLLOWER; [website]; // Send acknowledgment to the leader } } public void replicateLog() { if (state == [website] { for (RaftNode node : clusterNodes) { if (node != this) { node.appendEntries(currentTerm, selfId, log); } } } } }.

Nodes communicate using RPCs (Remote Procedure Calls). In Java, this can be implemented using libraries like gRPC or Apache Thrift.

Define the RPC service in a .proto file:

service RaftService { rpc RequestVote(RequestVoteRequest) returns (RequestVoteResponse); rpc AppendEntries(AppendEntriesRequest) returns (AppendEntriesResponse); }.

public class RaftServiceImpl extends RaftServiceGrpc.RaftServiceImplBase { @Override public void requestVote(RequestVoteRequest request, StreamObserver responseObserver) { boolean voteGranted = raftNode.requestVote(request.getTerm(), request.getCandidateId()); [website]; responseObserver.onCompleted(); } @Override public void appendEntries(AppendEntriesRequest request, StreamObserver responseObserver) { raftNode.appendEntries(request.getTerm(), request.getLeaderId(), request.getEntriesList()); [website]; responseObserver.onCompleted(); } }.

To ensure correctness, test your Raft implementation with scenarios like:

Leader Failure : Simulate a leader crash and verify a new leader is elected.

: Simulate a leader crash and verify a new leader is elected. Network Partitions : Test behavior during network splits.

: Test behavior during network splits. Log Consistency: Verify logs are replicated correctly across nodes.

Distributed Databases : Ensure consistency across database replicas.

: Ensure consistency across database replicas. Configuration Management : Synchronize configuration changes across clusters.

: Synchronize configuration changes across clusters. Service Discovery: Maintain a consistent view of available services.

If you don’t want to implement Raft from scratch, consider using existing libraries:

Copycat : A Java implementation of Raft.

: A Java implementation of Raft. Atomix: A distributed coordination framework that includes Raft.

Implementing the Raft consensus algorithm in Java is a powerful way to build fault-tolerant and consistent distributed systems. By breaking down the problem into leader election, log replication, and communication, you can create a robust Raft-based system. Whether you’re building a distributed database, a configuration manager, or a service discovery tool, Raft provides a reliable foundation for achieving consensus in distributed environments.

With this guide, you’re ready to dive into distributed systems and harness the power of Raft in your Java applications! 🚀.

If you’re heading to KubeCon Europe in London this April, chances are you’re not paying to sample the food. You’re going for the sessions and specific......

The energy sector is evolving rapidly, with decentralized energy systems and renewable energy data taking center stage. One of the most exciting de......

Minha experiência com programação mudou completamente no dia em que eu descobri e aprendi a usar o Docker. Conseguir subir e gerenciar serviços na min......

Read Response Body in JAX-RS Client from a POST Request

Read Response Body in JAX-RS Client from a POST Request

JAX-RS (Jakarta API for RESTful Web Services) is a widely used framework for building RESTful web services in Java. It provides a client API that allows us to interact with RESTful services. When making a POST request using the JAX-RS client, we often need to read the response body returned by the server. This article will guide you through the process of reading the response body from a POST request using the JAX-RS client.

To use JAX-RS client elements, add the following dependencies to your [website] . We will use Jersey, the reference implementation of JAX-RS.

[website] jersey-client [website] [website] jersey-media-json-binding [website].

2. Creating a Simple REST API (for Testing).

Before we create the client, let’s define a simple JAX-RS server to test our POST request. Assume we are sending a POST request to /api/clients with user details in JSON format.

@Path("/clients") public class UserResource { @POST @Consumes(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON) @Produces(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON) public Response createUser(User user) { [website]; // Simulate ID assignment return [website]; } }.

public class User { private int id; private String name; private String email; public User() { } public User(String name, String email) { [website] = name; [website] = email; } public int getId() { return id; } public void setId(int id) { [website] = id; } public String getName() { return name; } public void setName(String name) { [website] = name; } public String getEmail() { return email; } public void setEmail(String email) { [website] = email; } }.

This API accepts a POST request with a User object in JSON format, assigns it an ID, and returns the updated user as a response.

Now, let’s create a JAX-RS client to send a POST request and read the response body.

public class JaxrsClientExample { public static void main(String[] args) { // Create JAX-RS Client Client client = ClientBuilder.newClient(); // Define the target URL WebTarget target = [website]"[website]:8080/api/consumers"); // Create the user request payload User user = new User("John Fish", "[website]"); // Send POST request Response response = target.request(MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON) .post([website], MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)); // Read response body as String String jsonResponse = response.readEntity([website]; [website]"Response as String: " + jsonResponse); // Read response body as a User object User createdUser = response.readEntity([website]; [website]"Response as User Object: " + [website] + ", " + createdUser.getName()); [website]; } }.

To begin, we need to create an instance of the JAX-RS client, which acts as the foundation for making HTTP requests. This is achieved using Client client = ClientBuilder.newClient(); , which initializes a new JAX-RS client instance. Once the client is ready, we define the target API endpoint using WebTarget target = [website]"[website]:8080/api/consumers"); . This establishes the base URL for our requests, allowing us to interact with the specified RESTful service.

When sending a POST request, we use post([website], MediaType.APPLICATION_JSON)) , which takes a User object and converts it into a JSON payload. This ensures that the data is formatted correctly before being transmitted to the server.

After making the request, reading the response body is crucial for handling the server’s response. The simplest way to retrieve the response is as a raw JSON string using response.readEntity([website] . This is useful when we want to process or log the raw response manually.

However, in many cases, we want to work directly with a Java object. Using response.readEntity([website] , we can automatically convert the JSON response into a User object, leveraging Jackson’s JSON binding capabilities. This simplifies data handling by allowing us to interact with the response as a strongly typed Java object instead of parsing JSON manually.

Finally, to ensure efficient resource management, we close the client using [website]; , which releases any underlying resources and prevents potential memory leaks.

It is essential to check the HTTP status before reading the response body.

if (response.getStatus() == 200) { User createdUser = response.readEntity([website]; [website]"User Created: " + createdUser.getName()); } else { [website]"Error: " + response.getStatus() + " - " + response.readEntity([website]; }.

Start the JAX-RS server (full source code for the JAX-RS server is available from the download section), run the JAX-RS client, and you should see an output similar to the following.

Response as String: {"email":"[website]","id":1001,"name":"John Fish"} Response as User Object: 1001, John Fish.

This article demonstrated how to use the JAX-RS client API to send a POST request and read the response body in different formats. We covered setting up dependencies, creating a simple REST API, implementing the client, and handling errors. This approach allows seamless integration with RESTful services while leveraging the power of JAX-RS.

This article explored how to read the response body using a JAX-RS client.

Google Cloud organise Build with Gemini, une journée immersive dédiée aux développeurs, pour explorer les dernières avancées en matière d’IA et de Clo......

Do you think the method children() below is thread-safe?

Java import [website]; import [website]; import [website]; p......

Editor's Note: The following is an infographic written for and 's 2025 Trend analysis, Developer Experience: The Coalescence of Develo......

Kafka Message Acknowledgement Options

Kafka Message Acknowledgement Options

Apache Kafka is a distributed messaging system widely used for building real-time data pipelines and streaming applications. To ensure reliable message delivery, Kafka provides various message acknowledgment options for both producers and consumers. These options help balance performance, durability, and fault tolerance based on application needs. Producers can control how messages are acknowledged by brokers, while consumers manage message processing guarantees. Understanding these acknowledgment mechanisms is crucial for designing efficient Kafka-based systems. Let us delve into understanding Kafka message acknowledgment options and explore how they impact reliability, message ordering, and system resilience through practical Java examples.

Scalability: Kafka supports horizontal scaling by adding more brokers to the cluster.

Fault Tolerance: Data replication ensures message durability even if a broker fails.

High Throughput: Kafka processes millions of messages per second with low latency.

Durability: Messages are stored persistently, ensuring reliability.

Flexibility: Kafka integrates seamlessly with big data and cloud-based platforms.

Kafka producers can configure acknowledgments using the acks parameter. This setting determines when a producer considers a message as successfully sent.

acks=0 : The producer does not wait for acknowledgment from the broker. The message is sent asynchronously without waiting for confirmation, making it the fastest option but with a higher risk of data loss if the broker fails.

: The producer does not wait for acknowledgment from the broker. The message is sent asynchronously without waiting for confirmation, making it the fastest option but with a higher risk of data loss if the broker fails. acks=1 : The producer waits for acknowledgment from the leader only. If the leader broker receives the message and confirms it, the producer considers it successful. However, if the leader fails before replicating the data, the message might be lost.

: The producer waits for acknowledgment from the leader only. If the leader broker receives the message and confirms it, the producer considers it successful. However, if the leader fails before replicating the data, the message might be lost. acks=all (or -1 ): The producer waits for acknowledgment from all in-sync replicas (ISR). This ensures the highest level of durability, as messages are not considered sent until all replicas have confirmed receipt. This option provides strong consistency but may introduce latency.

[website] Choosing the Right Acknowledgment Strategy.

Choosing the right acknowledgment level depends on the application requirements:

For high throughput with low latency and tolerance for message loss, use acks=0 .

. For a balance between reliability and performance, use acks=1 .

. For the highest durability and no data loss, use acks=all .

[website] Java Code Example for Kafka Producer.

import [website]*; import [website]; public class KafkaProducerExample { public static void main(String[] args) { String topicName = "test-topic"; Properties props = new Properties(); [website]"bootstrap.servers", "localhost:9092"); [website]"key.serializer", "[website]"); [website]"value.serializer", "[website]"); // Setting acknowledgment level to 'all' [website]"acks", "all"); KafkaProducer producer = new KafkaProducer<>(props); for (int i = 1; i <= 5; i++) { ProducerRecord record = new ProducerRecord<>(topicName, "Key" + i, "Message" + i); [website], (metadata, exception) -> { if (exception == null) { [website]"Sent message to topic: " + [website] + " | Partition: " + metadata.partition() + " | Offset: " + [website]; } else { [website]"Error while producing: " + exception.getMessage()); } }); } [website]; } }.

This Java program demonstrates a simple Kafka producer that sends messages to a Kafka topic named “test-topic.” It first sets up a Properties object with essential Kafka configurations, including the bootstrap server ( localhost:9092 ), key and value serializers ( StringSerializer ), and acknowledgment level ( acks=all ) to ensure message durability. A KafkaProducer instance is created using these properties, and a loop iterates five times to send messages with keys ( Key1 to Key5 ) and values ( Message1 to Message5 ). Each message is wrapped in a ProducerRecord and sent asynchronously using [website] , which includes a callback to log metadata (topic, partition, and offset) on successful delivery or print an error message if the send fails. Finally, the producer is closed to release resources.

Sent message to topic: test-topic | Partition: 0 | Offset: 10 Sent message to topic: test-topic | Partition: 1 | Offset: 8 Sent message to topic: test-topic | Partition: 2 | Offset: 15 Sent message to topic: test-topic | Partition: 0 | Offset: 11 Sent message to topic: test-topic | Partition: 1 | Offset: 9.

[website] Challenges in Producer Acknowledgments.

Latency vs. Reliability: Higher acknowledgment levels increase reliability but add latency.

Message Duplication: Retries may lead to duplicate messages.

Leader Failures: Messages may be lost if the leader crashes before replication.

Kafka consumers use manual or automatic acknowledgments to ensure message processing reliability. Consumers track their read positions using offsets, and acknowledgment determines when the offset is committed.

[website] : The consumer automatically commits offsets at a regular interval. This setting reduces overhead but risks message loss in case of failure, as messages are considered processed even before actual consumption.

: The consumer automatically commits offsets at a regular interval. This setting reduces overhead but risks message loss in case of failure, as messages are considered processed even before actual consumption. [website] : The consumer manually commits offsets after processing messages. This approach ensures reliability by committing offsets only when processing is complete, preventing message loss but requiring additional management.

Keep in mind that when [website] , Kafka offers two methods for committing offsets:

commitSync() : Commits offsets synchronously, ensuring they are written to Kafka before proceeding. This approach guarantees message acknowledgment but may introduce latency.

: Commits offsets synchronously, ensuring they are written to Kafka before proceeding. This approach guarantees message acknowledgment but may introduce latency. commitAsync() : Commits offsets asynchronously, improving performance but risking data loss if the application crashes before completion.

[website] Choosing the Right Acknowledgment Strategy for Consumers.

Choosing the right acknowledgment strategy depends on your application’s needs:

For simple processing where some message loss is acceptable, use [website] .

. For critical applications requiring precise message handling, use [website] with commitSync() .

with . For high-performance scenarios with reduced acknowledgment overhead, use commitAsync() , but handle potential duplicate processing.

[website] Java Code Example for Kafka Consumer.

Consumed message: Message1 | Offset: 10 Consumed message: Message2 | Offset: 8 Consumed message: Message3 | Offset: 15 Consumed message: Message4 | Offset: 11 Consumed message: Message5 | Offset: 9.

Around the world, 127 new devices are connected to the Internet every second. That translates to 329 million new devices hooked up to the Internet of ......

One would question, why should I worry about what is happening behind the scenes as long as my model is able to deliver high-precision results for me?......

Redis is a high-performance NoSQL database that is usually used as an in-memory caching solution. However, it is very useful as the primary datastore ......

Market Impact Analysis

Market Growth Trend

2018201920202021202220232024
7.5%9.0%9.4%10.5%11.0%11.4%11.5%
7.5%9.0%9.4%10.5%11.0%11.4%11.5% 2018201920202021202220232024

Quarterly Growth Rate

Q1 2024 Q2 2024 Q3 2024 Q4 2024
10.8% 11.1% 11.3% 11.5%
10.8% Q1 11.1% Q2 11.3% Q3 11.5% Q4

Market Segments and Growth Drivers

Segment Market Share Growth Rate
Enterprise Software38%10.8%
Cloud Services31%17.5%
Developer Tools14%9.3%
Security Software12%13.2%
Other Software5%7.5%
Enterprise Software38.0%Cloud Services31.0%Developer Tools14.0%Security Software12.0%Other Software5.0%

Technology Maturity Curve

Different technologies within the ecosystem are at varying stages of maturity:

Innovation Trigger Peak of Inflated Expectations Trough of Disillusionment Slope of Enlightenment Plateau of Productivity AI/ML Blockchain VR/AR Cloud Mobile

Competitive Landscape Analysis

Company Market Share
Microsoft22.6%
Oracle14.8%
SAP12.5%
Salesforce9.7%
Adobe8.3%

Future Outlook and Predictions

The Ai: Latest Updates and Analysis landscape is evolving rapidly, driven by technological advancements, changing threat vectors, and shifting business requirements. Based on current trends and expert analyses, we can anticipate several significant developments across different time horizons:

Year-by-Year Technology Evolution

Based on current trajectory and expert analyses, we can project the following development timeline:

2024Early adopters begin implementing specialized solutions with measurable results
2025Industry standards emerging to facilitate broader adoption and integration
2026Mainstream adoption begins as technical barriers are addressed
2027Integration with adjacent technologies creates new capabilities
2028Business models transform as capabilities mature
2029Technology becomes embedded in core infrastructure and processes
2030New paradigms emerge as the technology reaches full maturity

Technology Maturity Curve

Different technologies within the ecosystem are at varying stages of maturity, influencing adoption timelines and investment priorities:

Time / Development Stage Adoption / Maturity Innovation Early Adoption Growth Maturity Decline/Legacy Emerging Tech Current Focus Established Tech Mature Solutions (Interactive diagram available in full report)

Innovation Trigger

  • Generative AI for specialized domains
  • Blockchain for supply chain verification

Peak of Inflated Expectations

  • Digital twins for business processes
  • Quantum-resistant cryptography

Trough of Disillusionment

  • Consumer AR/VR applications
  • General-purpose blockchain

Slope of Enlightenment

  • AI-driven analytics
  • Edge computing

Plateau of Productivity

  • Cloud infrastructure
  • Mobile applications

Technology Evolution Timeline

1-2 Years
  • Technology adoption accelerating across industries
  • digital transformation initiatives becoming mainstream
3-5 Years
  • Significant transformation of business processes through advanced technologies
  • new digital business models emerging
5+ Years
  • Fundamental shifts in how technology integrates with business and society
  • emergence of new technology paradigms

Expert Perspectives

Leading experts in the software dev sector provide diverse perspectives on how the landscape will evolve over the coming years:

"Technology transformation will continue to accelerate, creating both challenges and opportunities."

— Industry Expert

"Organizations must balance innovation with practical implementation to achieve meaningful results."

— Technology Analyst

"The most successful adopters will focus on business outcomes rather than technology for its own sake."

— Research Director

Areas of Expert Consensus

  • Acceleration of Innovation: The pace of technological evolution will continue to increase
  • Practical Integration: Focus will shift from proof-of-concept to operational deployment
  • Human-Technology Partnership: Most effective implementations will optimize human-machine collaboration
  • Regulatory Influence: Regulatory frameworks will increasingly shape technology development

Short-Term Outlook (1-2 Years)

In the immediate future, organizations will focus on implementing and optimizing currently available technologies to address pressing software dev challenges:

  • Technology adoption accelerating across industries
  • digital transformation initiatives becoming mainstream

These developments will be characterized by incremental improvements to existing frameworks rather than revolutionary changes, with emphasis on practical deployment and measurable outcomes.

Mid-Term Outlook (3-5 Years)

As technologies mature and organizations adapt, more substantial transformations will emerge in how security is approached and implemented:

  • Significant transformation of business processes through advanced technologies
  • new digital business models emerging

This period will see significant changes in security architecture and operational models, with increasing automation and integration between previously siloed security functions. Organizations will shift from reactive to proactive security postures.

Long-Term Outlook (5+ Years)

Looking further ahead, more fundamental shifts will reshape how cybersecurity is conceptualized and implemented across digital ecosystems:

  • Fundamental shifts in how technology integrates with business and society
  • emergence of new technology paradigms

These long-term developments will likely require significant technical breakthroughs, new regulatory frameworks, and evolution in how organizations approach security as a fundamental business function rather than a technical discipline.

Key Risk Factors and Uncertainties

Several critical factors could significantly impact the trajectory of software dev evolution:

Technical debt accumulation
Security integration challenges
Maintaining code quality

Organizations should monitor these factors closely and develop contingency strategies to mitigate potential negative impacts on technology implementation timelines.

Alternative Future Scenarios

The evolution of technology can follow different paths depending on various factors including regulatory developments, investment trends, technological breakthroughs, and market adoption. We analyze three potential scenarios:

Optimistic Scenario

Rapid adoption of advanced technologies with significant business impact

Key Drivers: Supportive regulatory environment, significant research breakthroughs, strong market incentives, and rapid user adoption.

Probability: 25-30%

Base Case Scenario

Measured implementation with incremental improvements

Key Drivers: Balanced regulatory approach, steady technological progress, and selective implementation based on clear ROI.

Probability: 50-60%

Conservative Scenario

Technical and organizational barriers limiting effective adoption

Key Drivers: Restrictive regulations, technical limitations, implementation challenges, and risk-averse organizational cultures.

Probability: 15-20%

Scenario Comparison Matrix

FactorOptimisticBase CaseConservative
Implementation TimelineAcceleratedSteadyDelayed
Market AdoptionWidespreadSelectiveLimited
Technology EvolutionRapidProgressiveIncremental
Regulatory EnvironmentSupportiveBalancedRestrictive
Business ImpactTransformativeSignificantModest

Transformational Impact

Technology becoming increasingly embedded in all aspects of business operations. This evolution will necessitate significant changes in organizational structures, talent development, and strategic planning processes.

The convergence of multiple technological trends—including artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and ubiquitous connectivity—will create both unprecedented security challenges and innovative defensive capabilities.

Implementation Challenges

Technical complexity and organizational readiness remain key challenges. Organizations will need to develop comprehensive change management strategies to successfully navigate these transitions.

Regulatory uncertainty, particularly around emerging technologies like AI in security applications, will require flexible security architectures that can adapt to evolving compliance requirements.

Key Innovations to Watch

Artificial intelligence, distributed systems, and automation technologies leading innovation. Organizations should monitor these developments closely to maintain competitive advantages and effective security postures.

Strategic investments in research partnerships, technology pilots, and talent development will position forward-thinking organizations to leverage these innovations early in their development cycle.

Technical Glossary

Key technical terms and definitions to help understand the technologies discussed in this article.

Understanding the following technical concepts is essential for grasping the full implications of the technologies discussed in this article. These definitions provide context for both technical and non-technical readers.

Filter by difficulty:

API beginner

algorithm APIs serve as the connective tissue in modern software architectures, enabling different applications and services to communicate and share data according to defined protocols and data formats.
API diagram Visual explanation of API concept
Example: Cloud service providers like AWS, Google Cloud, and Azure offer extensive APIs that allow organizations to programmatically provision and manage infrastructure and services.

algorithm intermediate

interface

scalability intermediate

platform

platform intermediate

encryption Platforms provide standardized environments that reduce development complexity and enable ecosystem growth through shared functionality and integration capabilities.

framework intermediate

API