Technology News from Around the World, Instantly on Oracnoos!

Microsoft Malware Keys: Latest Updates and Analysis

New Microsoft script updates Windows media with bootkit malware fixes

New Microsoft script updates Windows media with bootkit malware fixes

Microsoft has released a PowerShell script to help Windows consumers and admins modification bootable media so it utilizes the new "Windows UEFI CA 2023" certificate before the mitigations of the BlackLotus UEFI bootkit are enforced later this year.

BlackLotus is a UEFI bootkit that can bypass Secure Boot and gain control over the operating system's boot process. Once in control, BlackLotus can disable Windows security aspects, such as BitLocker, Hypervisor-Protected Code Integrity (HVCI), and Microsoft Defender Antivirus, allowing it to deploy malware at the highest privilege level while remaining undetected.

In March 2023 and then July 2024, Microsoft released security updates for a Secure Boot bypass tracked as CVE-2023-24932 that revokes vulnerable boot managers used by BlackLotus.

However, this fix is disabled by default, as incorrectly applying the upgrade or conflicts on devices could cause the operating system to no longer load. Instead, rolling out the fix in stages allows Windows admins to test it before it is enforced sometime before 2026.

When enabled, the security revision will add the "Windows UEFI CA 2023" certificate to the UEFI "Secure Boot Signature Database." Admins can then install newer boot managers that are signed with this certificate.

This process also includes updating the Secure Boot Forbidden Signature Database (DBX) to add the "Windows Production CA 2011" certificate. This certificate is used to sign older, vulnerable boot managers, and once revoked, will cause those boot managers to become untrusted and not load.

However, if you apply the mitigations and run into an issue booting your devices, you must first modification your bootable media to use the Windows UEFI CA 2023 certificate to troubleshoot the Windows install.

"If you encounter an issue with the device after applying the mitigations and the device becomes unbootable, you might be unable to start or recover your device from existing media," Microsoft explains in a support bulletin about the staged rollout of fixes for CVE-2023-24932.

"Recovery or install media will need to be updated so that it will work with a device that has the mitigations applied."

Yesterday, Microsoft released a PowerShell script that helps you revision bootable media so it uses the Windows UEFI CA 2023 certificate.

Script to apply CVE-2023-24932 mitigations to bootable Windows media.

"The PowerShell script described in this article can be used to revision Windows bootable media so that the media can be used on systems that trust the Windows UEFI CA 2023 certificate," explains a new support bulletin about the script.

The PowerShell script can be downloaded from Microsoft and can be used to revision bootable media files for ISO CD/DVD image files, a USB flash drive, a local drive path, or a network drive path.

To utilize the utility, you must first download and install the Windows ADK, which is necessary for this script to work correctly.

When run, the script will revision the media files to use the Windows UEFI CA 2023 certificate and install the boot managers signed by this certificate.

It is strongly advised that Windows admins test this process before the enforcement stage of the security updates is reached. Microsoft says this will happen by the end of 2026 and will give a six-month notice before it begins.

British-based engineering firm IMI plc has disclosed a security breach after unknown attackers hacked into the firm's systems.

Curious about the buzz around AI in cybersecurity? Wonder if it's just a shiny new toy in the tech world or a serious game changer? Let's unpack this ......

The FCC has proposed a $4,492,500 fine against VoIP service provider Telnyx for allegedly allowing clients to make robocalls posing as fictitious FC......

Microsoft Identifies 3,000 Leaked ASP.NET Keys Enabling Code Injection Attacks

Microsoft Identifies 3,000 Leaked ASP.NET Keys Enabling Code Injection Attacks

Microsoft is warning of an insecure practice wherein software developers are incorporating publicly disclosed [website] machine keys from publicly accessible resources, thereby putting their applications in attackers' pathway.

The tech giant's threat intelligence team noted it observed limited activity in December 2024 that involved an unknown threat actor using a publicly available, static [website] machine key to inject malicious code and deliver the Godzilla post-exploitation framework.

It also noted that it has identified over 3,000 publicly disclosed keys that could be used for these types of attacks, which it's calling ViewState code injection attacks.

"Whereas many previously known ViewState code injection attacks used compromised or stolen keys that are often sold on dark web forums, these publicly disclosed keys could pose a higher risk because they are available in multiple code repositories and could have been pushed into development code without modification," Microsoft showcased.

ViewState is a method used in the [website] framework to preserve page and control values between postbacks. This can also include application data that is specific to a page.

"By default, view state data is stored in the page in a hidden field and is encoded using base64 encoding," Microsoft notes in its documentation. "In addition, a hash of the view state data is created from the data by using a machine authentication code (MAC) key. The hash value is added to the encoded view state data and the resulting string is stored in the page."

In using a hash value, the idea is to ensure that the view state data has not been corrupted or tampered with by malicious actors. That stated, if these keys are stolen or made accessible to unauthorized third-parties, it opens the door to a scenario where the threat actor can leverage the keys to send a malicious ViewState request and execute arbitrary code.

"When the request is processed by [website] Runtime on the targeted server, the ViewState is decrypted and validated successfully because the right keys are used," Redmond noted. "The malicious code is then loaded into the worker process memory and executed, providing the threat actor remote code execution capabilities on the target IIS web server."

Microsoft has provided a list of hash values for the publicly disclosed machine keys, urging end-individuals to check them against the machine keys used in their environments. It has also warned that in the event of a successful exploitation of publicly disclosed keys, merely rotating the keys will not be sufficient as the threat actors may have already established persistence on the host.

To mitigate the risk posed by such attacks, it's advised to not copy keys from publicly available insights and to regularly rotate keys. As a further step to deter threat actors, Microsoft stated it removed key artifacts from "limited instances" where they were included in its documentation.

The development comes as cloud security corporation Aqua revealed details of an OPA Gatekeeper bypass that could be exploited to conduct unauthorized actions in Kubernetes environments, including deploying unauthorized container images.

"In the k8sallowedrepos policy, a security risk arises from how the Rego logic is written in the ConstraintTemplate file," researchers Yakir Kadkoda and Assaf Morag expressed in an analysis shared with The Hacker News.

"This risk is further amplified when clients define values in the Constraint YAML file that do not align with how the Rego logic processes them. This mismatch can result in policy bypasses, making the restrictions ineffective."

Threat actors have been observed exploiting in recent times disclosed security flaws in SimpleHelp's Remote Monitoring and Management (RMM) software as a pre......

India's central bank, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), expressed it's introducing an exclusive.

New mobile apps from the Chinese artificial intelligence (AI) business DeepSeek have remained among the top three “free” downloads for Apple and Google......

Microsoft says attackers use exposed ASP.NET keys to deploy malware

Microsoft says attackers use exposed ASP.NET keys to deploy malware

Microsoft warns that attackers are deploying malware in ViewState code injection attacks using static ASP. NET machine keys found online.

As Microsoft Threat Intelligence experts in the recent past discovered, some developers use [website] validationKey and decryptionKey keys (designed to protect ViewState from tampering and information disclosure) found on code documentation and repository platforms in their own software.

ViewState enables [website] Web Forms to control state and preserve user inputs across page reloads. However, if attackers get the machine key designed to protect it from tampering and information disclosure, they can use it in code injection attacks to craft malicious payloads by attaching crafted message authentication code (MAC).

However, threat actors also use machine keys from publicly available findings in code injection attacks to create malicious ViewStates (used by [website] Web Forms to control state and preserve pages) by attaching crafted message authentication code (MAC).

When loading the ViewStates sent via POST requests, the [website] Runtime on the targeted server decrypts and validates the attackers' maliciously crafted ViewState data because it uses the right keys, loads it into the worker process memory, and executes it.

This grants them remote code execution (RCE) on the targeted IIS web servers, allowing them to deploy additional malicious payloads.

In one instance, observed in December 2024, an unattributed attacker used a publicly known machine key to deliver the Godzilla post-exploitation framework, which capabilities malicious command execution and shellcode injection capabilities, to a targeted Internet Information Services (IIS) web server.

ViewState code injection attack chain (Microsoft).

"Microsoft has since identified over 3,000 publicly disclosed keys that could be used for these types of attacks, which are called ViewState code injection attacks," the firm mentioned on Thursday.

"Whereas many previously known ViewState code injection attacks used compromised or stolen keys that are often sold on dark web forums, these publicly disclosed keys could pose a higher risk because they are available in multiple code repositories and could have been pushed into development code without modification."

To block such attacks, Microsoft recommends developers securely generate machine keys, not use default keys or keys found online, encrypt machineKey and connectionStrings elements to block access to plaintext secrets, upgrade apps to use [website] [website] to enable Antimalware Scan Interface (AMSI) capabilities, and harden Windows Servers by using attack surface reduction rules such as Block Webshell creation for Servers.

Microsoft also shared detailed steps for removing or replacing [website] keys in the [website] configuration file using either PowerShell or the IIS manager console and removed key samples from its public documentation to further discourage this insecure practice.

"If successful exploitation of publicly disclosed keys has occurred, rotating machine keys will not sufficiently address possible backdoors or persistence methods established by a threat actor or other post-exploitation activity, and additional investigation may be warranted," Redmond warned.

"In particular, web-facing servers should be fully investigated and strongly considered for re-formatting and re-installation in an offline medium in cases where publicly disclosed keys have been identified, as these servers are most at risk of possible exploitation."

Microsoft is warning of an insecure practice wherein software developers are incorporating publicly disclosed [website] machine keys from publicly acces......

The foundations for social engineering attacks – manipulating humans – might not have changed much over the years. It's the vectors – how these techni......

Microsoft Edge 133 is now rolling out globally, and it ships with several improvements, including a new scareware blocker feature. In addition, Micros......

Market Impact Analysis

Market Growth Trend

2018201920202021202220232024
8.7%10.5%11.0%12.2%12.9%13.3%13.4%
8.7%10.5%11.0%12.2%12.9%13.3%13.4% 2018201920202021202220232024

Quarterly Growth Rate

Q1 2024 Q2 2024 Q3 2024 Q4 2024
12.5% 12.9% 13.2% 13.4%
12.5% Q1 12.9% Q2 13.2% Q3 13.4% Q4

Market Segments and Growth Drivers

Segment Market Share Growth Rate
Network Security26%10.8%
Cloud Security23%17.6%
Identity Management19%15.3%
Endpoint Security17%13.9%
Other Security Solutions15%12.4%
Network Security26.0%Cloud Security23.0%Identity Management19.0%Endpoint Security17.0%Other Security Solutions15.0%

Technology Maturity Curve

Different technologies within the ecosystem are at varying stages of maturity:

Innovation Trigger Peak of Inflated Expectations Trough of Disillusionment Slope of Enlightenment Plateau of Productivity AI/ML Blockchain VR/AR Cloud Mobile

Competitive Landscape Analysis

Company Market Share
Palo Alto Networks14.2%
Cisco Security12.8%
Crowdstrike9.3%
Fortinet7.6%
Microsoft Security7.1%

Future Outlook and Predictions

The Microsoft Malware Keys landscape is evolving rapidly, driven by technological advancements, changing threat vectors, and shifting business requirements. Based on current trends and expert analyses, we can anticipate several significant developments across different time horizons:

Year-by-Year Technology Evolution

Based on current trajectory and expert analyses, we can project the following development timeline:

2024Early adopters begin implementing specialized solutions with measurable results
2025Industry standards emerging to facilitate broader adoption and integration
2026Mainstream adoption begins as technical barriers are addressed
2027Integration with adjacent technologies creates new capabilities
2028Business models transform as capabilities mature
2029Technology becomes embedded in core infrastructure and processes
2030New paradigms emerge as the technology reaches full maturity

Technology Maturity Curve

Different technologies within the ecosystem are at varying stages of maturity, influencing adoption timelines and investment priorities:

Time / Development Stage Adoption / Maturity Innovation Early Adoption Growth Maturity Decline/Legacy Emerging Tech Current Focus Established Tech Mature Solutions (Interactive diagram available in full report)

Innovation Trigger

  • Generative AI for specialized domains
  • Blockchain for supply chain verification

Peak of Inflated Expectations

  • Digital twins for business processes
  • Quantum-resistant cryptography

Trough of Disillusionment

  • Consumer AR/VR applications
  • General-purpose blockchain

Slope of Enlightenment

  • AI-driven analytics
  • Edge computing

Plateau of Productivity

  • Cloud infrastructure
  • Mobile applications

Technology Evolution Timeline

1-2 Years
  • Technology adoption accelerating across industries
  • digital transformation initiatives becoming mainstream
3-5 Years
  • Significant transformation of business processes through advanced technologies
  • new digital business models emerging
5+ Years
  • Fundamental shifts in how technology integrates with business and society
  • emergence of new technology paradigms

Expert Perspectives

Leading experts in the cyber security sector provide diverse perspectives on how the landscape will evolve over the coming years:

"Technology transformation will continue to accelerate, creating both challenges and opportunities."

— Industry Expert

"Organizations must balance innovation with practical implementation to achieve meaningful results."

— Technology Analyst

"The most successful adopters will focus on business outcomes rather than technology for its own sake."

— Research Director

Areas of Expert Consensus

  • Acceleration of Innovation: The pace of technological evolution will continue to increase
  • Practical Integration: Focus will shift from proof-of-concept to operational deployment
  • Human-Technology Partnership: Most effective implementations will optimize human-machine collaboration
  • Regulatory Influence: Regulatory frameworks will increasingly shape technology development

Short-Term Outlook (1-2 Years)

In the immediate future, organizations will focus on implementing and optimizing currently available technologies to address pressing cyber security challenges:

  • Technology adoption accelerating across industries
  • digital transformation initiatives becoming mainstream

These developments will be characterized by incremental improvements to existing frameworks rather than revolutionary changes, with emphasis on practical deployment and measurable outcomes.

Mid-Term Outlook (3-5 Years)

As technologies mature and organizations adapt, more substantial transformations will emerge in how security is approached and implemented:

  • Significant transformation of business processes through advanced technologies
  • new digital business models emerging

This period will see significant changes in security architecture and operational models, with increasing automation and integration between previously siloed security functions. Organizations will shift from reactive to proactive security postures.

Long-Term Outlook (5+ Years)

Looking further ahead, more fundamental shifts will reshape how cybersecurity is conceptualized and implemented across digital ecosystems:

  • Fundamental shifts in how technology integrates with business and society
  • emergence of new technology paradigms

These long-term developments will likely require significant technical breakthroughs, new regulatory frameworks, and evolution in how organizations approach security as a fundamental business function rather than a technical discipline.

Key Risk Factors and Uncertainties

Several critical factors could significantly impact the trajectory of cyber security evolution:

Evolving threat landscape
Skills shortage
Regulatory compliance complexity

Organizations should monitor these factors closely and develop contingency strategies to mitigate potential negative impacts on technology implementation timelines.

Alternative Future Scenarios

The evolution of technology can follow different paths depending on various factors including regulatory developments, investment trends, technological breakthroughs, and market adoption. We analyze three potential scenarios:

Optimistic Scenario

Rapid adoption of advanced technologies with significant business impact

Key Drivers: Supportive regulatory environment, significant research breakthroughs, strong market incentives, and rapid user adoption.

Probability: 25-30%

Base Case Scenario

Measured implementation with incremental improvements

Key Drivers: Balanced regulatory approach, steady technological progress, and selective implementation based on clear ROI.

Probability: 50-60%

Conservative Scenario

Technical and organizational barriers limiting effective adoption

Key Drivers: Restrictive regulations, technical limitations, implementation challenges, and risk-averse organizational cultures.

Probability: 15-20%

Scenario Comparison Matrix

FactorOptimisticBase CaseConservative
Implementation TimelineAcceleratedSteadyDelayed
Market AdoptionWidespreadSelectiveLimited
Technology EvolutionRapidProgressiveIncremental
Regulatory EnvironmentSupportiveBalancedRestrictive
Business ImpactTransformativeSignificantModest

Transformational Impact

Technology becoming increasingly embedded in all aspects of business operations. This evolution will necessitate significant changes in organizational structures, talent development, and strategic planning processes.

The convergence of multiple technological trends—including artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and ubiquitous connectivity—will create both unprecedented security challenges and innovative defensive capabilities.

Implementation Challenges

Technical complexity and organizational readiness remain key challenges. Organizations will need to develop comprehensive change management strategies to successfully navigate these transitions.

Regulatory uncertainty, particularly around emerging technologies like AI in security applications, will require flexible security architectures that can adapt to evolving compliance requirements.

Key Innovations to Watch

Artificial intelligence, distributed systems, and automation technologies leading innovation. Organizations should monitor these developments closely to maintain competitive advantages and effective security postures.

Strategic investments in research partnerships, technology pilots, and talent development will position forward-thinking organizations to leverage these innovations early in their development cycle.

Technical Glossary

Key technical terms and definitions to help understand the technologies discussed in this article.

Understanding the following technical concepts is essential for grasping the full implications of the security threats and defensive measures discussed in this article. These definitions provide context for both technical and non-technical readers.

Filter by difficulty:

ransomware beginner

algorithm Ransomware typically encrypts victim data using strong cryptographic algorithms, making recovery impossible without the decryption key. Advanced variants now also exfiltrate data before encryption, enabling double-extortion tactics.
Example: The REvil ransomware group leveraged a supply chain attack against Kaseya VSA to deploy ransomware to thousands of organizations simultaneously, demanding a $70 million ransom payment.

threat intelligence intermediate

interface

SOC intermediate

platform

malware beginner

encryption Malware can take many forms including viruses, worms, trojans, ransomware, spyware, adware, and rootkits. Modern malware often employs sophisticated evasion techniques to avoid detection by security solutions.
Types of malwareCommon malware types and their characteristics
Example: The Emotet trojan began as banking malware but evolved into a delivery mechanism for other malware types, demonstrating how sophisticated malware can adapt and change functionality over time.

interface intermediate

API Well-designed interfaces abstract underlying complexity while providing clearly defined methods for interaction between different system components.

platform intermediate

cloud computing Platforms provide standardized environments that reduce development complexity and enable ecosystem growth through shared functionality and integration capabilities.

EDR intermediate

middleware Unlike traditional antivirus, EDR solutions monitor and record system activities and events across endpoints, applying behavioral analysis and threat intelligence to detect sophisticated attacks.