Technology News from Around the World, Instantly on Oracnoos!

Hunters International ransomware claims attack on Tata Technologies - Related to technologies, toronto, ransomware, fixes, authorities

Google fixes Android zero-day exploited by Serbian authorities

Google fixes Android zero-day exploited by Serbian authorities

Google has released patches for 43 vulnerabilities in Android's March 2025 security revision, including two zero-days exploited in targeted attacks.

Serbian authorities have used one of the zero-days, a high-severity information disclosure security vulnerability (CVE-2024-50302) in the Linux kernel's driver for Human Interface Devices, to unlock confiscated devices.

The flaw was reportedly exploited as part of an Android zero-day exploit chain developed by Israeli digital forensics enterprise Cellebrite to unlock confiscated devices.

The exploit chain—which also includes a USB Video Class zero-day (CVE-2024-53104) patched last month and an ALSA USB-sound driver zero-day)—was found by Amnesty International's Security Lab in mid-2024 while analyzing the logs found on a device unlocked by Serbian authorities.

Google told BleepingComputer last week that they shared fixes for these flaws with OEM partners in January.

"We were aware of these vulnerabilities and exploitation risk prior to these reports and promptly developed fixes for Android. Fixes were shared with OEM partners in a partner advisory on January 18," a Google spokesperson told BleepingComputer.

The second zero-day fixed this month (CVE-2024-43093) is an Android Framework privilege escalation vulnerability that allows local attackers to access sensitive directories due to incorrect unicode normalization by exploiting a file path filter bypass without additional execution privileges or user interaction.

This month's Android security updates also address 11 vulnerabilities that can let attackers gain remote code execution on vulnerable devices.

Google has issued two sets of security patches, the 2025-03-01 and 2025-03-01 security patch levels. The latter comes with all fixes from the first batch and patches for closed-source third-party and kernel subcomponents, which may not apply to all Android devices.

Google Pixel devices receive the updates immediately, while other vendors will often take longer to test and fine-tune the security patches for their hardware configurations.

Manufacturers can also prioritize the earlier patch set for quicker updates, which does not necessarily indicate increased exploitation risk.

In November, the enterprise patched another Android zero-day (CVE-2024-43047), which was first tagged as exploited by Google Project Zero in October 2024 and used by the Serbian government in NoviSpy spyware attacks targeting the Android devices of activists, journalists, and protestors.

A new botnet malware named 'Eleven11bot' has infected over 86,000 IoT devices, primarily security cameras and network video recorders (NVRs), to condu......

Scammers are impersonating the BianLian ransomware gang in fake ransom notes sent to US companies via snail mail through the United States Postal Serv......

New research has uncovered further links between the Black Basta and Cactus ransomware gangs, with members of both groups utilizing the same social en......

Hunters International ransomware claims attack on Tata Technologies

Hunters International ransomware claims attack on Tata Technologies

The Hunters International ransomware gang has claimed responsibility for a January cyberattack attack on Tata Technologies, stating they stole [website] of data from the business.

Tata Technologies provides engineering and digital solutions for manufacturing industries worldwide. Founded in 1989 and based in Pune, it operates in 27 countries with over 12,500 employees, specializing in automotive, aerospace, and industrial sectors with product development and digital transformation services.

The Indian tech giant reported in January 2025 that it had suffered a security breach by ransomware actors, which disrupted parts of its IT systems. The organization noted that the incident's impact on its operations was minimal, while client delivery services were not affected at all.

Tata noted it was already restoring impacted IT systems and promised to share more updates as soon as its internal investigations, aided by experts in the field, produced results.

With no further updates have been shared by the firm for over a month, Hunters International added an entry of Tata Technologies on its extortion page on the dark web, claiming responsibility for the attack.

Tata Technologies listed on Hunters International extortion page.

The threat actors claim to have stolen [website] of data from Tata Technologies, consisting of 730,000 files. The ransomware gang threatens to release the stolen files in exactly one week if a ransom demand is not met.

However, Hunters International did not post any samples of the stolen files or elaborate on what kind of documents they hold.

BleepingComputer has contacted Tata Technologies about the threat actor's allegations, but a comment wasn't immediately available.

Hunters International is a ransomware group that had had high-profile attacks since late 2023, when it emerged as a potential rebrand of Hive. The gang's attacks include breaches of [website] Navy contractor Austal USA and Japanese optics giant Hoya.

The threat group also became notorious for showing no ethical barriers, even engaging in individual extortion targeting Fred Hutch cancer patients.

Although many of their implies were validated, there have been cases of dispute, like the one from the [website] Marshals Service in August 2024, which denied that its systems were breached by Hunters contrary to the threat actor's allegations.

Mit Erscheinen von iOS 18 hatte Apple im September zahlreiche, auch schwere Sicherheitslücken gestopft. Das dazugehörige Supportdokument mit weiteren ......

Microsoft hat Windows 365 Disaster Recovery Plus vorgestellt. Zum jetzigen Zeitpunkt liegt das Disaster-Recovery-Tool als lizenzpflichtiges Add-on für......

​The Polish Space Agency (POLSA) has been offline since it disconnected its systems from the Internet over the weekend to contain a breach of its IT i......

Toronto Zoo shares update on last year's ransomware attack

Toronto Zoo shares update on last year's ransomware attack

The Toronto Zoo, the largest zoo in Canada, has provided more information about the data stolen during a ransomware attack in January 2024.

In a final notification regarding the cyberattack, the Toronto Zoo stated the resulting data breach impacts varying combinations of personal and financial information belonging to employees, former employees, volunteers, and donors.

The exposed information includes transaction data such as impacted individuals' names, street address information, phone numbers, and e-mail addresses. It also contains the last four digits of credit card numbers and associated expiration dates for guests and members who made credit card transactions between January 2022 and April 2023.

"The data includes information about all guests and members who engaged the following types of transactions between 2000 to April 2023: general admission and membership purchases," it expressed.

The zoo disclosed the incident on January 8, saying the attack did not impact the animals' well-being or day-to-day operations.

Toronto Zoo has reported the data breach to the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario (the IPC) and advises those affected to monitor financial account statements for suspicious activity.

While Toronto Zoo has not officially linked the incident to a specific threat actor or hacking group, the Akira ransomware operation claimed the breach in January 2024 and has since .

Akira states they've stolen 133GB of files from the zoo's compromised file server, including database backups, ticket information, and other user data.

In early February, the cybercrime gang started seeding a torrent file containing multiple archives containing over 35GB of this data.

TorontoZoo entry on Akira's leak site (BleepingComputer).

"Lots of NDAs and confidential agreements are represented in the data. Some personal files (driver licenses and so on) can be found in the files. And of course, lots of interesting info about animals," the ransomware group says on its leak site.

​Akira emerged two years ago, in March 2023, and has quickly gained notoriety after adding a long string of victims worldwide across various industry verticals.

Based on negotiation chats seen by BleepingComputer, Akira demands ransoms ranging from $200,000 to millions of dollars, depending on the size of the compromised organization.

So far, Akira has claimed multiple high-profile victims, including Stanford University, Nissan Oceania, and Nissan Australia. Since it surfaced, the gang has added over 300 organizations to its dark web leak site.

, Akira ransomware operators have breached over 250 organizations and collected roughly $42 million in ransom payments until April 2024.

A new campaign is targeting companies in Taiwan with malware known as Winos [website] as part of phishing emails masquerading as the country's National Taxa......

We’ve all heard a million times: growing demand for robust cybersecurity in the face of rising cyber threats is undeniable. Globally small and medium-......

Separate fixes to macOS and iOS patch respective flaws in the kernel and WebKit that can allow threat actors to take over devices and are under attack......

Market Impact Analysis

Market Growth Trend

2018201920202021202220232024
8.7%10.5%11.0%12.2%12.9%13.3%13.4%
8.7%10.5%11.0%12.2%12.9%13.3%13.4% 2018201920202021202220232024

Quarterly Growth Rate

Q1 2024 Q2 2024 Q3 2024 Q4 2024
12.5% 12.9% 13.2% 13.4%
12.5% Q1 12.9% Q2 13.2% Q3 13.4% Q4

Market Segments and Growth Drivers

Segment Market Share Growth Rate
Network Security26%10.8%
Cloud Security23%17.6%
Identity Management19%15.3%
Endpoint Security17%13.9%
Other Security Solutions15%12.4%
Network Security26.0%Cloud Security23.0%Identity Management19.0%Endpoint Security17.0%Other Security Solutions15.0%

Technology Maturity Curve

Different technologies within the ecosystem are at varying stages of maturity:

Innovation Trigger Peak of Inflated Expectations Trough of Disillusionment Slope of Enlightenment Plateau of Productivity AI/ML Blockchain VR/AR Cloud Mobile

Competitive Landscape Analysis

Company Market Share
Palo Alto Networks14.2%
Cisco Security12.8%
Crowdstrike9.3%
Fortinet7.6%
Microsoft Security7.1%

Future Outlook and Predictions

The Ransomware Attack Google landscape is evolving rapidly, driven by technological advancements, changing threat vectors, and shifting business requirements. Based on current trends and expert analyses, we can anticipate several significant developments across different time horizons:

Year-by-Year Technology Evolution

Based on current trajectory and expert analyses, we can project the following development timeline:

2024Early adopters begin implementing specialized solutions with measurable results
2025Industry standards emerging to facilitate broader adoption and integration
2026Mainstream adoption begins as technical barriers are addressed
2027Integration with adjacent technologies creates new capabilities
2028Business models transform as capabilities mature
2029Technology becomes embedded in core infrastructure and processes
2030New paradigms emerge as the technology reaches full maturity

Technology Maturity Curve

Different technologies within the ecosystem are at varying stages of maturity, influencing adoption timelines and investment priorities:

Time / Development Stage Adoption / Maturity Innovation Early Adoption Growth Maturity Decline/Legacy Emerging Tech Current Focus Established Tech Mature Solutions (Interactive diagram available in full report)

Innovation Trigger

  • Generative AI for specialized domains
  • Blockchain for supply chain verification

Peak of Inflated Expectations

  • Digital twins for business processes
  • Quantum-resistant cryptography

Trough of Disillusionment

  • Consumer AR/VR applications
  • General-purpose blockchain

Slope of Enlightenment

  • AI-driven analytics
  • Edge computing

Plateau of Productivity

  • Cloud infrastructure
  • Mobile applications

Technology Evolution Timeline

1-2 Years
  • Technology adoption accelerating across industries
  • digital transformation initiatives becoming mainstream
3-5 Years
  • Significant transformation of business processes through advanced technologies
  • new digital business models emerging
5+ Years
  • Fundamental shifts in how technology integrates with business and society
  • emergence of new technology paradigms

Expert Perspectives

Leading experts in the cyber security sector provide diverse perspectives on how the landscape will evolve over the coming years:

"Technology transformation will continue to accelerate, creating both challenges and opportunities."

— Industry Expert

"Organizations must balance innovation with practical implementation to achieve meaningful results."

— Technology Analyst

"The most successful adopters will focus on business outcomes rather than technology for its own sake."

— Research Director

Areas of Expert Consensus

  • Acceleration of Innovation: The pace of technological evolution will continue to increase
  • Practical Integration: Focus will shift from proof-of-concept to operational deployment
  • Human-Technology Partnership: Most effective implementations will optimize human-machine collaboration
  • Regulatory Influence: Regulatory frameworks will increasingly shape technology development

Short-Term Outlook (1-2 Years)

In the immediate future, organizations will focus on implementing and optimizing currently available technologies to address pressing cyber security challenges:

  • Technology adoption accelerating across industries
  • digital transformation initiatives becoming mainstream

These developments will be characterized by incremental improvements to existing frameworks rather than revolutionary changes, with emphasis on practical deployment and measurable outcomes.

Mid-Term Outlook (3-5 Years)

As technologies mature and organizations adapt, more substantial transformations will emerge in how security is approached and implemented:

  • Significant transformation of business processes through advanced technologies
  • new digital business models emerging

This period will see significant changes in security architecture and operational models, with increasing automation and integration between previously siloed security functions. Organizations will shift from reactive to proactive security postures.

Long-Term Outlook (5+ Years)

Looking further ahead, more fundamental shifts will reshape how cybersecurity is conceptualized and implemented across digital ecosystems:

  • Fundamental shifts in how technology integrates with business and society
  • emergence of new technology paradigms

These long-term developments will likely require significant technical breakthroughs, new regulatory frameworks, and evolution in how organizations approach security as a fundamental business function rather than a technical discipline.

Key Risk Factors and Uncertainties

Several critical factors could significantly impact the trajectory of cyber security evolution:

Evolving threat landscape
Skills shortage
Regulatory compliance complexity

Organizations should monitor these factors closely and develop contingency strategies to mitigate potential negative impacts on technology implementation timelines.

Alternative Future Scenarios

The evolution of technology can follow different paths depending on various factors including regulatory developments, investment trends, technological breakthroughs, and market adoption. We analyze three potential scenarios:

Optimistic Scenario

Rapid adoption of advanced technologies with significant business impact

Key Drivers: Supportive regulatory environment, significant research breakthroughs, strong market incentives, and rapid user adoption.

Probability: 25-30%

Base Case Scenario

Measured implementation with incremental improvements

Key Drivers: Balanced regulatory approach, steady technological progress, and selective implementation based on clear ROI.

Probability: 50-60%

Conservative Scenario

Technical and organizational barriers limiting effective adoption

Key Drivers: Restrictive regulations, technical limitations, implementation challenges, and risk-averse organizational cultures.

Probability: 15-20%

Scenario Comparison Matrix

FactorOptimisticBase CaseConservative
Implementation TimelineAcceleratedSteadyDelayed
Market AdoptionWidespreadSelectiveLimited
Technology EvolutionRapidProgressiveIncremental
Regulatory EnvironmentSupportiveBalancedRestrictive
Business ImpactTransformativeSignificantModest

Transformational Impact

Technology becoming increasingly embedded in all aspects of business operations. This evolution will necessitate significant changes in organizational structures, talent development, and strategic planning processes.

The convergence of multiple technological trends—including artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and ubiquitous connectivity—will create both unprecedented security challenges and innovative defensive capabilities.

Implementation Challenges

Technical complexity and organizational readiness remain key challenges. Organizations will need to develop comprehensive change management strategies to successfully navigate these transitions.

Regulatory uncertainty, particularly around emerging technologies like AI in security applications, will require flexible security architectures that can adapt to evolving compliance requirements.

Key Innovations to Watch

Artificial intelligence, distributed systems, and automation technologies leading innovation. Organizations should monitor these developments closely to maintain competitive advantages and effective security postures.

Strategic investments in research partnerships, technology pilots, and talent development will position forward-thinking organizations to leverage these innovations early in their development cycle.

Technical Glossary

Key technical terms and definitions to help understand the technologies discussed in this article.

Understanding the following technical concepts is essential for grasping the full implications of the security threats and defensive measures discussed in this article. These definitions provide context for both technical and non-technical readers.

Filter by difficulty:

ransomware beginner

algorithm Ransomware typically encrypts victim data using strong cryptographic algorithms, making recovery impossible without the decryption key. Advanced variants now also exfiltrate data before encryption, enabling double-extortion tactics.
Example: The REvil ransomware group leveraged a supply chain attack against Kaseya VSA to deploy ransomware to thousands of organizations simultaneously, demanding a $70 million ransom payment.

phishing beginner

interface Modern phishing attacks are increasingly sophisticated, often leveraging AI to create convincing spear-phishing campaigns that target specific individuals with personalized content that appears legitimate.
Phishing attack flowAnatomy of a typical phishing attack
Example: Business Email Compromise (BEC) attacks are sophisticated phishing campaigns where attackers impersonate executives to trick employees into transferring funds or sensitive information.

platform intermediate

platform Platforms provide standardized environments that reduce development complexity and enable ecosystem growth through shared functionality and integration capabilities.

DDoS intermediate

encryption

malware beginner

API Malware can take many forms including viruses, worms, trojans, ransomware, spyware, adware, and rootkits. Modern malware often employs sophisticated evasion techniques to avoid detection by security solutions.
Types of malwareCommon malware types and their characteristics
Example: The Emotet trojan began as banking malware but evolved into a delivery mechanism for other malware types, demonstrating how sophisticated malware can adapt and change functionality over time.

SOC intermediate

cloud computing

zero-day intermediate

middleware These vulnerabilities are particularly dangerous because defenders have no time to develop and deploy patches before exploitation occurs. They are highly valued in both offensive security markets and criminal underground.
Zero-day vulnerability timelineTimeline showing vulnerability discovery to patch development
Example: The SUNBURST attack exploited a zero-day vulnerability in SolarWinds Orion software, remaining undetected for months while compromising numerous government agencies and private organizations.

interface intermediate

scalability Well-designed interfaces abstract underlying complexity while providing clearly defined methods for interaction between different system components.