“Our future is predominantly American”, says CEO of Nvidia-backed London startup PolyAI - Related to against, london, admits, is, “our
NCLT Admits Plea To Initiate Insolvency Proceedings Against AVIOM

In a statement, the RBI presented that it undertook the step "owing to governance concerns and defaults in meeting various payment obligations"
The central bank, on January 27, superseded the board of AVIOM under Section 45-IE(1) of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934.
About three weeks after the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) filed a plea to initiate corporate insolvency resolution proceedings (CIRP) against Delhi NCR-based NBFC AVIOM India Housing Finance, the National Corporate Law Tribunal (NCLT) has admitted the plea.
A bench comprising judicial member Mahendra Khandelwal and technical member Dr Sanjeev Ranjan passed the order admitting the bankruptcy proceedings today.
“The Hon’ble NCLT vide order dated 20 February 2025, has admitted the application for commencement of corporate insolvency resolution process of AVIOM India Housing Finance Private Limited and has appointed Mr. Ram Kumar as the Administrator as per Rule 5 (a) (iii) of FSP Insolvency Rules,” AVIOM introduced on its website.
The central bank, on January 27, superseded the board of AVIOM under Section 45-IE(1) of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, which gives the RBI the power to supersede the board of directors of an NBFC for a period of five years.
In a statement, the RBI expressed that it undertook the step “owing to governance concerns and defaults in meeting various payment obligations”.
Superseding the board of AVIOM, the RBI appointed ex-chief general manager, Punjab National Bank as its administrator on January 27. Subsequently, it moved an insolvency plea at the New Delhi Bench of the NCLT on January 30 under the financial service providers (FSP) Insolvency Rules, 2019, which led to an interim moratorium that restricts legal proceedings, asset transfers, and recovery actions against the enterprise.
The issue stems from a fraud within the firm, about which it informed the BSE on November 22, 2024.
In a letter to its lenders back in November, the NBFC expressed that the National Housing Bank (NHB) had appointed an independent third-party forensic auditor to audit its affairs following a “regular on-site supervisory inspection that resulted in observations, including that the statement of accounts of mutual fund(s) appear to be managed”.
On December 6, the NBFC noted that it was in the process of determining the exact extent of the fraud and its impact on its financial statements.
The exact fraud amount is yet to be publicly showcased. Due to the fraud, the organization began facing liquidity issues and was expecting a delay in the payment of interest. The fraud disclosure led to rating agencies ICRA, CRISIL and India Ratings and Research downgrading the NBFC from BBB+ to D.
Founded in 2016, AVIOM provides housing loans to women from predominantly semi-urban and rural regions who do not have any formal income documentation. Its lenders and partners include HDFC Bank, IDFC Bank, Kotak Mahindra Bank, and Northern Arc. Its international lenders include US International Development Finance Corporation, BlueOrchid, Triple Jump, among others.
Prior to this funding round, the startup raised INR 4 Cr in its pre-Series A round.
The company plans to use the capital to expand in Tier I & II citi......
Barcelona-based VC 4Founders Capital has launched its third fund, 4Founders Capital III, having secured €44M, primarily from existing investors.
Nokia is putting the first cellular network on the moon.
Later this month, Intuitive Machines, the private organization behind the first commercial lander ......
“Our future is predominantly American”, says CEO of Nvidia-backed London startup PolyAI

The CEO and co-founder of Nvidia-backed AI-powered voice assistant startup PolyAI says the London startup’s future is “predominantly American” but it will retain its UK office.
Nikola Mrkšić, the co-founder of PolyAI, was speaking on the [website] podcast, where he discussed the history of the startup, the rise of generative AI, and its impact on the workforce, DeepSeek, among other topics. The CEO expressed questions about the location of a startup's HQ, in a post-Covid world, were superfluous.
PolyAI was founded in 2017 by Mrkšić, (formerly of Apple’s Siri), Tsung-Hslen Wen (formerly of Google) , and Pei-Hao Su (formerly of Meta) who met at the University of Cambridge. The startup develops AI-powered automated voices for enterprise clients.
Last year, it closed a $50m (£[website] funding round led by Hedosophia and NVentures, the VC arm of Nvidia, valuing it close to $500m. The startup, which employs over 200 people, has offices in London (its biggest office), New York, San Francisco, and also an office in Belgrade, Serbia, where Mrkšić hails from.
Over recent years, there has been much chatter about the merits and downsides of London as an HQ for startups. Mrkšić expressed the reason the startup’s future was largely in the US was because over 70 per cent of its revenues now came from the US market.
Changes are on the horizon for Android devices later this year. Amazon has showcased that starting August 20, it will discontinue its app store for An......
Table of Contents Table of Contents How to play Connections Hints for today’s Connections Today’s Connections answers NYT Connection FAQs.
SEBI To Tighten Disclosures For New-Age Tech IPOs

The current IPO framework includes KPIs like revenue from operations, profit or loss after tax, return on equity, earnings per share, among others.
Companies will have to provide financial metrics and ratios along with operational parameters such as long-term sustainability of the business and drivers of financial performance, among others.
The markets regulator is mulling increasing the disclosure timeline for all past transactions and fund raise for startups to 3 years from 18 months currently.
Amid the increasing number of new-age tech IPOs in the country, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) is reportedly inching closer to tightening the disclosure requirements for IPO-bound companies.
, the markets regulator is mulling increasing the disclosure timeline for all past transactions and fund raise for startups to 3 years from 18 months currently.
Citing insights, the research noted that the companies will have to provide financial metrics and ratios along with operational parameters such as long-term sustainability of the business and drivers of financial performance, among others.
Other inclusions will include disclosures of all key financial or operational information related to any private placement or rights issue and comparisons of key performance indicators (KPIs) of the entity filing for the IPO with at least three of its competitors for a period of three years.
“It has been nearly three years since the KPI disclosure regime was first introduced to address concerns related to IPOs of new-age companies and startups. Now, there is enough data to analyse the industry response and strengthen the regulatory framework for KPI disclosures,” a source was quoted as saying.
It must be noted that this isn’t the first findings to state that SEBI is looking to tighten KPI disclosures for IPO-bound companies. In November, CNBC-TV18 reported that SEBI is looking to strengthen KPI disclosures for startups, specifically those who do not have a proven track record in terms of profitability.
The current IPO framework includes KPIs like revenue from operations, profit or loss after tax, return on equity, earnings per share, among others.
In August last year, SEBI had directed Industry Standards Forum (ISF), which includes representatives from industry bodies such as ASSOCHAM, FICCI, and CII, to determine the relevant KPIs for such new-age tech IPOs.
It is pertinent to note that amid the surge in IPOs, the markets regulator tightened the regulatory framework governing IPOs for small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in December last year.
Back then, it introduced profitability requirements as well as put a cap on shares to be sold through the offer for sale (OFS) route, among other key parameters.
The study comes at a time when multiple new-age tech companies are en route to an IPO. While startups like Fractal, Zepto, Lenskart, OfBusiness, Zetwerk, among others, are inching closer to filing their IPO papers, others like WeWork, IndiQube, Ather Energy, BlueStone are either awaiting or have received the regulatory approval for their IPOs.
The California Institute of the Arts (CalArts) has launched the [website] (Digital Research Entertainment Arts Media Storytelling) Initiative suppo......
Kynda, a Hamburg-based biotech producing sustainable proteins, has raised €3M in Seed funding.
The round was led by Enjoy Ventures (through their Inv......
Market Impact Analysis
Market Growth Trend
2018 | 2019 | 2020 | 2021 | 2022 | 2023 | 2024 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
12.0% | 14.4% | 15.2% | 16.8% | 17.8% | 18.3% | 18.5% |
Quarterly Growth Rate
Q1 2024 | Q2 2024 | Q3 2024 | Q4 2024 |
---|---|---|---|
16.8% | 17.5% | 18.2% | 18.5% |
Market Segments and Growth Drivers
Segment | Market Share | Growth Rate |
---|---|---|
Digital Transformation | 31% | 22.5% |
IoT Solutions | 24% | 19.8% |
Blockchain | 13% | 24.9% |
AR/VR Applications | 18% | 29.5% |
Other Innovations | 14% | 15.7% |
Technology Maturity Curve
Different technologies within the ecosystem are at varying stages of maturity:
Competitive Landscape Analysis
Company | Market Share |
---|---|
Amazon Web Services | 16.3% |
Microsoft Azure | 14.7% |
Google Cloud | 9.8% |
IBM Digital | 8.5% |
Salesforce | 7.9% |
Future Outlook and Predictions
The Nclt Admits Plea landscape is evolving rapidly, driven by technological advancements, changing threat vectors, and shifting business requirements. Based on current trends and expert analyses, we can anticipate several significant developments across different time horizons:
Year-by-Year Technology Evolution
Based on current trajectory and expert analyses, we can project the following development timeline:
Technology Maturity Curve
Different technologies within the ecosystem are at varying stages of maturity, influencing adoption timelines and investment priorities:
Innovation Trigger
- Generative AI for specialized domains
- Blockchain for supply chain verification
Peak of Inflated Expectations
- Digital twins for business processes
- Quantum-resistant cryptography
Trough of Disillusionment
- Consumer AR/VR applications
- General-purpose blockchain
Slope of Enlightenment
- AI-driven analytics
- Edge computing
Plateau of Productivity
- Cloud infrastructure
- Mobile applications
Technology Evolution Timeline
- Technology adoption accelerating across industries
- digital transformation initiatives becoming mainstream
- Significant transformation of business processes through advanced technologies
- new digital business models emerging
- Fundamental shifts in how technology integrates with business and society
- emergence of new technology paradigms
Expert Perspectives
Leading experts in the digital innovation sector provide diverse perspectives on how the landscape will evolve over the coming years:
"Technology transformation will continue to accelerate, creating both challenges and opportunities."
— Industry Expert
"Organizations must balance innovation with practical implementation to achieve meaningful results."
— Technology Analyst
"The most successful adopters will focus on business outcomes rather than technology for its own sake."
— Research Director
Areas of Expert Consensus
- Acceleration of Innovation: The pace of technological evolution will continue to increase
- Practical Integration: Focus will shift from proof-of-concept to operational deployment
- Human-Technology Partnership: Most effective implementations will optimize human-machine collaboration
- Regulatory Influence: Regulatory frameworks will increasingly shape technology development
Short-Term Outlook (1-2 Years)
In the immediate future, organizations will focus on implementing and optimizing currently available technologies to address pressing digital innovation challenges:
- Technology adoption accelerating across industries
- digital transformation initiatives becoming mainstream
These developments will be characterized by incremental improvements to existing frameworks rather than revolutionary changes, with emphasis on practical deployment and measurable outcomes.
Mid-Term Outlook (3-5 Years)
As technologies mature and organizations adapt, more substantial transformations will emerge in how security is approached and implemented:
- Significant transformation of business processes through advanced technologies
- new digital business models emerging
This period will see significant changes in security architecture and operational models, with increasing automation and integration between previously siloed security functions. Organizations will shift from reactive to proactive security postures.
Long-Term Outlook (5+ Years)
Looking further ahead, more fundamental shifts will reshape how cybersecurity is conceptualized and implemented across digital ecosystems:
- Fundamental shifts in how technology integrates with business and society
- emergence of new technology paradigms
These long-term developments will likely require significant technical breakthroughs, new regulatory frameworks, and evolution in how organizations approach security as a fundamental business function rather than a technical discipline.
Key Risk Factors and Uncertainties
Several critical factors could significantly impact the trajectory of digital innovation evolution:
Organizations should monitor these factors closely and develop contingency strategies to mitigate potential negative impacts on technology implementation timelines.
Alternative Future Scenarios
The evolution of technology can follow different paths depending on various factors including regulatory developments, investment trends, technological breakthroughs, and market adoption. We analyze three potential scenarios:
Optimistic Scenario
Rapid adoption of advanced technologies with significant business impact
Key Drivers: Supportive regulatory environment, significant research breakthroughs, strong market incentives, and rapid user adoption.
Probability: 25-30%
Base Case Scenario
Measured implementation with incremental improvements
Key Drivers: Balanced regulatory approach, steady technological progress, and selective implementation based on clear ROI.
Probability: 50-60%
Conservative Scenario
Technical and organizational barriers limiting effective adoption
Key Drivers: Restrictive regulations, technical limitations, implementation challenges, and risk-averse organizational cultures.
Probability: 15-20%
Scenario Comparison Matrix
Factor | Optimistic | Base Case | Conservative |
---|---|---|---|
Implementation Timeline | Accelerated | Steady | Delayed |
Market Adoption | Widespread | Selective | Limited |
Technology Evolution | Rapid | Progressive | Incremental |
Regulatory Environment | Supportive | Balanced | Restrictive |
Business Impact | Transformative | Significant | Modest |
Transformational Impact
Technology becoming increasingly embedded in all aspects of business operations. This evolution will necessitate significant changes in organizational structures, talent development, and strategic planning processes.
The convergence of multiple technological trends—including artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and ubiquitous connectivity—will create both unprecedented security challenges and innovative defensive capabilities.
Implementation Challenges
Technical complexity and organizational readiness remain key challenges. Organizations will need to develop comprehensive change management strategies to successfully navigate these transitions.
Regulatory uncertainty, particularly around emerging technologies like AI in security applications, will require flexible security architectures that can adapt to evolving compliance requirements.
Key Innovations to Watch
Artificial intelligence, distributed systems, and automation technologies leading innovation. Organizations should monitor these developments closely to maintain competitive advantages and effective security postures.
Strategic investments in research partnerships, technology pilots, and talent development will position forward-thinking organizations to leverage these innovations early in their development cycle.
Technical Glossary
Key technical terms and definitions to help understand the technologies discussed in this article.
Understanding the following technical concepts is essential for grasping the full implications of the security threats and defensive measures discussed in this article. These definitions provide context for both technical and non-technical readers.