Technology News from Around the World, Instantly on Oracnoos!

What you need to know about the T-Mobile Starlink mobile service - Related to chromebook, its, 8gb, service, that

Intel needed a win — its new laptop CPU delivers just that

Intel needed a win — its new laptop CPU delivers just that

Table of Contents Table of Contents By the numbers Insane efficiency Intel needed a win.

It feels cliche at this point, but it’s true. Intel can’t catch a break. The new Arrow Lake-H chips feel like a tide shift for Team Blue, though, leveraging the highly efficient architectures the enterprise debuted with Lunar Lake to deliver performance and battery life worthy of the best laptops on the market.

We’ve already seen what Intel’s Lunar Lake processors are capable of — read our Asus Zenbook S 14 review for more on that — but. These new Arrow Lake-H offerings are a bit different. Under the hood, Intel is still using its Lion Cove and Skymont core architectures, which Arrow Lake-H shares with Lunar Lake. However, these chips get a larger core count, higher power budget, and. Beefier integrated graphics based on Intel’s Battlemage architecture.

The power budget is really essential here. The base power is 45W, but Intel allows the chip to boost up to 115W for short periods of time. The core split is interesting, too. You get 16 total cores, but they’re split between six performance cores, eight efficient cores, and two low-power efficient cores. If you remember, the efficient cores are actually the main performance driver in this architecture. So the extra two low-power ones are simply there for a little extra multi-core grunt.

I’ve brought in a few comparisons from AMD here. First is an identical laptop packing the Ryzen AI 9 365 — which Intel compares the Core Ultra 9 285H to — and. Second is an Asus Zenbook S 16 with a beefier Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. These are 10-core and 12-core CPUs, respectively, but they use simultaneous multi-threading. The Core Ultra 9 285H doesn’t, so while Intel has a core advantage, AMD actually has a thread advantage.

MSI Prestige 16 (Core Ultra 9 285H) MSI Prestige 16 (Ryzen 9 AI 365) Asus Zenbook S 16 (Ryzen AI 9 HX 370) Cinebench R24 (single/multi) 128 / 918 111 / 819 110 / 871 Geekbench 6 (single/multi) 2,776 / 15,773 2,832 / 14,059 N/A PCMark 10 7,508 7,352 7,229 PugetBench for Photoshop 7,717 7,656 7,248 PugetBench for Premiere Pro 3,520 3,107 2,971 3DMark Time Spy 4,018 3,565 3,207 3DMark Steel Nomad Light 3,494 3,088 3,219.

Intel’s approach clearly works, as you can see in both Cinebench and. Geekbench. These apps typically favor a thread advantage, but Intel is still coming out on top. That’s probably due to a solid lead in single-core speed, which you can see in Cinebench.

PCMark 10 is a bit different. With all three laptops more or less falling in the same range. That’s not too surprising. These are high-end CPUs in some of the best laptops money can buy, so of course they can handle basic office and. Productivity tasks with ease.

The difference makers are Photoshop and Premiere. Intel is providing a slight edge in Photoshop, but there’s a massive boost in Premiere. The Battlemage GPU is certainly helping there, along with QuickSync. Gaming sees a huge boost, as well — frankly, AMD isn’t even close with its integrated graphics, at least until we see the Ryzen AI MAX chips later this year.

Intel is no stranger to performance, and. Frankly, it’s not impressive that Intel can outclass the competition (especially considering the larger power budget). What is impressive is that Intel is able to deliver this level of performance while keeping its battery life in check.

It was very strange queuing up a video to loop on the Core Ultra 9 285H when I left work, only to find it still looping the next morning. And with around half the battery to spare. That’s the kind of efficiency Intel is offering here and without any of the typical tricks in Windows that kick in when the battery gets low enough.

In local video playback, I got nearly 21 hours of battery life out of the MSI Prestige 16 — 20 hours and. 46 minutes, to be exact. For context, the Acer Swift 14 AI with the Ryzen AI 9 365 managed 18 hours and 36 minutes, the MacBook Air M3 lasted 19 hours and 29 minutes. And the HP Omnibook X with the Snapdragon X Elite stayed on for 22 hours and 4 minutes. The Snapdragon chip comes out on top, but Intel is damn close considering this is a 16-core flagship chip.

I expected decent battery life given that Intel is using the same core architectures as its Lunar Lake offerings, but with more cores and. A higher budget, I didn’t expect this Arrow Lake-H chip to be as close as it is to Intel’s Lunar Lake offerings. Not only is Intel’s performance fantastic here — its battery life holds up equally as well.

Something struck me when testing Intel’s new Arrow Lake-H chip. It just worked. Intel has really struggled to catch a break, and although its Lunar Lake laptop chips were a small highlight. They weren’t enough to reverse the narrative established by the desktop Arrow Lake range. Arrow Lake-H makes a lot of sense, though, and it proves Intel was onto something when it decided to focus on efficiency. Now, finally, we can see how Intel is able to scale its design to deliver great performance and battery life in a single package.

It’s a great change of pace for Intel, who up to this point struggled to provide a clean ramp between performance and. Efficiency in laptops, rather splitting the ranges in half with two completely different approaches to architecture. Arrow Lake-H feels like everything coming together, and for a firm that’s been promising that everything will come together soon for years, that’s a big win.

Like the first part. Chernobylite 2 is a story of people who try to accomplish an impossible mission and survive in the sinister Chornobyl Zone. Chern...

Youtube has been trying to push consumers toward Premium for a while now, dangling all kinds of benefits ranging from ad-free viewing to extra elements li...

Beim gestrigen Erdbeben in Taiwan mit einer Stärke von 6,4 gab es zum Glück keine Toten. Aber großflächigen Schaden. TSMCs Anlagen sollen sich wie erw...

Whoa! Get this Asus Chromebook with 8GB RAM for just $109

Whoa! Get this Asus Chromebook with 8GB RAM for just $109

Laptops and other electronics are about to get a lot more expensive in the US. If you’re in the market for a super-cheap laptop, you can’t do much superior than this Asus Chromebook, which is going for $109 on eBay. It’s a refurbished model, but with 8GB of RAM and a two-year warranty, it’s still an incredibly affordable way to get a decent laptop.

The Asus CX15 is a laptop, and. Yeah, it’s pretty basic even by Chromebook standards. The Intel Celeron N4500 is a dual-core CPU from 2021, with DDR4 memory support and UHD integrated graphics. 8GB of memory is low for a modern Windows laptop, but. It’s more than enough for ChromeOS as long as you don’t go ham on the browser tabs. This model has just 64GB of storage (not counting the OS), so expect to rely on cloud storage for day-to-day data storage needs.

The CX15 does offer USB-C charging. A nice feature at this price level. And surprisingly, there are both USB-C and USB-A ports on both sides, plus headphone port and microSD card slot. But it doesn’t have a touchscreen, the body and trackpad are plastic, you get the idea.

With Google’s commitment to ten years of ChromeOS updates. It should be running the latest build of the operating system until 2031 at the very least. And the eBay seller includes a two-year warranty from Allstate, so even if the laptop you get isn’t in perfect cosmetic condition. You’ll get a little extra peace of mind for at least two years.

No one’s going to call this thing a speed demon. But if all you need is a reliable way to access the web with a big screen, it’ll do the job. Grab one at this super price while stock is still available!

Get a refurbished Asus Chromebook with 8GB RAM for just $109.

Zotac has come up with a new way to fight graphics card scalping by starting a.

All season long. The Philadelphia Eagles were hounded by the doubters. One running back can’t win a Super Bowl, they mentioned. Jalen Hurts doesn’t pass en...

Mit Phasmophobia gelang dem Indie-Studio Kinetic Games ein Überraschungserfolg. Mittlerweile wurde das Geisterjäger-Spiel über alle Plattformen hinweg...

What you need to know about the T-Mobile Starlink mobile service

What you need to know about the T-Mobile Starlink mobile service

T-Mobile yesterday announced more details of its new service powered by Starlink and said Verizon and AT&T customers can use the satellite offering, too. The standard price will be $15 a month as an add-on for T-Mobile customers, and $20 a month for people who don't have T-Mobile as their primary carrier.

While we've written numerous articles about the Starlink/T-Mobile collaboration over the past two and a half years. The service's beta test and a Super Bowl commercial are raising awareness that it exists. In this article we'll answer some questions you might have about T-Mobile Starlink (yes, T-Mobile Starlink is the official name of the service).

Over the past 13 months. SpaceX's Starlink division has launched about 450 Direct to Cell satellites that can provide service to mobile phones in areas where there are no cell towers. Starlink is partnering with cellular carriers in multiple countries, and T-Mobile is its primary commercial partner in the US.

T-Mobile says the goal is to provide telecom service in dead zones. The 500,000 square miles of the US that aren't reached by any terrestrial cell tower. When a user crosses into a dead zone, their phone is supposed to automatically connect to Starlink satellites. T-Mobile Starlink only supports texting for now, but T-Mobile says voice calls and data service will be available eventually.

T-Mobile Starlink is obviously available to T-Mobile customers, but. The carrier said that Verizon and AT&T customers can also use it on their existing phones without switching entirely to T-Mobile. Verizon and AT&T customers will need an unlocked phone with eSIM technology, which lets users activate a cellular plan without a physical SIM card.

Like the first part, Chernobylite 2 is a story of people who try to accomplish an impossible mission and. Survive in the sinister Chornobyl Zone. Chern...

Zotac has come up with a new way to fight graphics card scalping by starting a.

Market Impact Analysis

Market Growth Trend

2018201920202021202220232024
4.9%5.9%6.2%6.9%7.3%7.5%7.6%
4.9%5.9%6.2%6.9%7.3%7.5%7.6% 2018201920202021202220232024

Quarterly Growth Rate

Q1 2024 Q2 2024 Q3 2024 Q4 2024
6.9% 7.2% 7.4% 7.6%
6.9% Q1 7.2% Q2 7.4% Q3 7.6% Q4

Market Segments and Growth Drivers

Segment Market Share Growth Rate
Semiconductors35%9.3%
Consumer Electronics29%6.2%
Enterprise Hardware22%5.8%
Networking Equipment9%7.9%
Other Hardware5%5.3%
Semiconductors35.0%Consumer Electronics29.0%Enterprise Hardware22.0%Networking Equipment9.0%Other Hardware5.0%

Technology Maturity Curve

Different technologies within the ecosystem are at varying stages of maturity:

Innovation Trigger Peak of Inflated Expectations Trough of Disillusionment Slope of Enlightenment Plateau of Productivity AI/ML Blockchain VR/AR Cloud Mobile

Competitive Landscape Analysis

Company Market Share
Apple18.7%
Samsung16.4%
Intel12.9%
NVIDIA9.8%
AMD7.3%

Future Outlook and Predictions

The Just Mobile Intel landscape is evolving rapidly, driven by technological advancements, changing threat vectors, and shifting business requirements. Based on current trends and expert analyses, we can anticipate several significant developments across different time horizons:

Year-by-Year Technology Evolution

Based on current trajectory and expert analyses, we can project the following development timeline:

2024Early adopters begin implementing specialized solutions with measurable results
2025Industry standards emerging to facilitate broader adoption and integration
2026Mainstream adoption begins as technical barriers are addressed
2027Integration with adjacent technologies creates new capabilities
2028Business models transform as capabilities mature
2029Technology becomes embedded in core infrastructure and processes
2030New paradigms emerge as the technology reaches full maturity

Technology Maturity Curve

Different technologies within the ecosystem are at varying stages of maturity, influencing adoption timelines and investment priorities:

Time / Development Stage Adoption / Maturity Innovation Early Adoption Growth Maturity Decline/Legacy Emerging Tech Current Focus Established Tech Mature Solutions (Interactive diagram available in full report)

Innovation Trigger

  • Generative AI for specialized domains
  • Blockchain for supply chain verification

Peak of Inflated Expectations

  • Digital twins for business processes
  • Quantum-resistant cryptography

Trough of Disillusionment

  • Consumer AR/VR applications
  • General-purpose blockchain

Slope of Enlightenment

  • AI-driven analytics
  • Edge computing

Plateau of Productivity

  • Cloud infrastructure
  • Mobile applications

Technology Evolution Timeline

1-2 Years
  • Technology adoption accelerating across industries
  • digital transformation initiatives becoming mainstream
3-5 Years
  • Significant transformation of business processes through advanced technologies
  • new digital business models emerging
5+ Years
  • Fundamental shifts in how technology integrates with business and society
  • emergence of new technology paradigms

Expert Perspectives

Leading experts in the hardware tech sector provide diverse perspectives on how the landscape will evolve over the coming years:

"Technology transformation will continue to accelerate, creating both challenges and opportunities."

— Industry Expert

"Organizations must balance innovation with practical implementation to achieve meaningful results."

— Technology Analyst

"The most successful adopters will focus on business outcomes rather than technology for its own sake."

— Research Director

Areas of Expert Consensus

  • Acceleration of Innovation: The pace of technological evolution will continue to increase
  • Practical Integration: Focus will shift from proof-of-concept to operational deployment
  • Human-Technology Partnership: Most effective implementations will optimize human-machine collaboration
  • Regulatory Influence: Regulatory frameworks will increasingly shape technology development

Short-Term Outlook (1-2 Years)

In the immediate future, organizations will focus on implementing and optimizing currently available technologies to address pressing hardware tech challenges:

  • Technology adoption accelerating across industries
  • digital transformation initiatives becoming mainstream

These developments will be characterized by incremental improvements to existing frameworks rather than revolutionary changes, with emphasis on practical deployment and measurable outcomes.

Mid-Term Outlook (3-5 Years)

As technologies mature and organizations adapt, more substantial transformations will emerge in how security is approached and implemented:

  • Significant transformation of business processes through advanced technologies
  • new digital business models emerging

This period will see significant changes in security architecture and operational models, with increasing automation and integration between previously siloed security functions. Organizations will shift from reactive to proactive security postures.

Long-Term Outlook (5+ Years)

Looking further ahead, more fundamental shifts will reshape how cybersecurity is conceptualized and implemented across digital ecosystems:

  • Fundamental shifts in how technology integrates with business and society
  • emergence of new technology paradigms

These long-term developments will likely require significant technical breakthroughs, new regulatory frameworks, and evolution in how organizations approach security as a fundamental business function rather than a technical discipline.

Key Risk Factors and Uncertainties

Several critical factors could significantly impact the trajectory of hardware tech evolution:

Supply chain disruptions
Material availability constraints
Manufacturing complexity

Organizations should monitor these factors closely and develop contingency strategies to mitigate potential negative impacts on technology implementation timelines.

Alternative Future Scenarios

The evolution of technology can follow different paths depending on various factors including regulatory developments, investment trends, technological breakthroughs, and market adoption. We analyze three potential scenarios:

Optimistic Scenario

Rapid adoption of advanced technologies with significant business impact

Key Drivers: Supportive regulatory environment, significant research breakthroughs, strong market incentives, and rapid user adoption.

Probability: 25-30%

Base Case Scenario

Measured implementation with incremental improvements

Key Drivers: Balanced regulatory approach, steady technological progress, and selective implementation based on clear ROI.

Probability: 50-60%

Conservative Scenario

Technical and organizational barriers limiting effective adoption

Key Drivers: Restrictive regulations, technical limitations, implementation challenges, and risk-averse organizational cultures.

Probability: 15-20%

Scenario Comparison Matrix

FactorOptimisticBase CaseConservative
Implementation TimelineAcceleratedSteadyDelayed
Market AdoptionWidespreadSelectiveLimited
Technology EvolutionRapidProgressiveIncremental
Regulatory EnvironmentSupportiveBalancedRestrictive
Business ImpactTransformativeSignificantModest

Transformational Impact

Technology becoming increasingly embedded in all aspects of business operations. This evolution will necessitate significant changes in organizational structures, talent development, and strategic planning processes.

The convergence of multiple technological trends—including artificial intelligence, quantum computing, and ubiquitous connectivity—will create both unprecedented security challenges and innovative defensive capabilities.

Implementation Challenges

Technical complexity and organizational readiness remain key challenges. Organizations will need to develop comprehensive change management strategies to successfully navigate these transitions.

Regulatory uncertainty, particularly around emerging technologies like AI in security applications, will require flexible security architectures that can adapt to evolving compliance requirements.

Key Innovations to Watch

Artificial intelligence, distributed systems, and automation technologies leading innovation. Organizations should monitor these developments closely to maintain competitive advantages and effective security postures.

Strategic investments in research partnerships, technology pilots, and talent development will position forward-thinking organizations to leverage these innovations early in their development cycle.

Technical Glossary

Key technical terms and definitions to help understand the technologies discussed in this article.

Understanding the following technical concepts is essential for grasping the full implications of the security threats and defensive measures discussed in this article. These definitions provide context for both technical and non-technical readers.

Filter by difficulty:

CPU intermediate

algorithm

ASIC intermediate

interface

RAM intermediate

platform

platform intermediate

encryption Platforms provide standardized environments that reduce development complexity and enable ecosystem growth through shared functionality and integration capabilities.

GPU intermediate

API